Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T06:17:10.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elections and Economic Turbulence in Brazil: Candidates, Voters, and Investors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

The relation between elections and the economy in Latin America might be understood by considering the agency of candidates and the issue of policy preference congruence between investors and voters. The preference congruence model proposed in this article highlights political risk in emerging markets. Certain risk features increase the role of candidate campaign rhetoric and investor preferences in elections. When politicians propose policies that can appease voters and investors, elections may have a limited effect on economic indicators, such as inflation. But when voter and investor priorities differ significantly, deterioration of economic indicators is more likely. Moreover, voter and investor congruence is more likely before stabilization, when an inverted Philips curve exists, as opposed to following stabilization, when a more traditional Philips curve emerges.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcântara, Eurípedes 2002. O que elese temem em Lula: o nervosismo do mercado tem diversos motives, mas a indefiniçào sobre o que o Pt realmente é o fator mais decisivo neste momento. Veja, May 22: 45.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Nouriel, Roubini, Gerald, D. Cohen 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Hugo, Borsani. 2004. Presidents and Cabinets: the Political Determinants of Fiscal Behavior in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 39, 1: 127.Google Scholar
Barbosa Filho, Nelson H. 2001. International Liquidity and Growth in Brazil. Working Paper. New York: Center for Economic Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Chaffee, Wilber Albert. 1998. Desenvolvimento: Politics and Economy in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisa. Presidential election data sets. <http://www.datafolha.folha.uol.com.br>..>Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957 (republished 1997) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Economist 2002. Who's Afraid of Lula?May 18: 36.Google Scholar
Fair, R. 1978. The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President. Review of Economics and Statistics 60, 2: 173.Google Scholar
Grinbaum, Ricardo. 2002. O Pt em Wall Street. Istoé Dinheiro, July 24: 78.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, and Patrik, Marier. 2004. Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries. American Journal of Political Science 48, 3: 187.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Opinião Pública e Estatística (IBOPE).. 2002. Pesquisa de opinião Publica sobre assuntos políticos administrativos Opp 570. Brazil, November-December. <http://www.ibope.com.br>..>Google Scholar
Institute of Applied Economic Research (Ipea). Economic data: daily series, historical series, and macroeconomic indicators. <http://www.ipeadata.gov.br>..>Google Scholar
MacRae, D.C. 1977. A Political Model of the Business Cycle. Journal of Political Economy 85, 2: 163.Google Scholar
Mahon, James E. Jr. 1996. Mobile Capital and Latin American Development. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P. 1995. Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, and Timothy, Scully.. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 198.Google Scholar
Martínez, Juan, and Javier, Santiso. 2003. Financial Markets and Politics: the Confidence Game in Latin American Emerging Economies. International Political Science Review 24, 3: 195.Google Scholar
Meneguello, Rachel. 1996. Electoral Behavior in Brazil: the 1994 Presidential Elections. International Social Science Journal 146: 627–41.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–90.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Guido, Tabellini. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42, 2 (Summer): 160.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1993. The Political Economy of Elections in Latin America. American Political Science Review 87, 2: 1407.Google Scholar
Rohter, Larry. 2005. Brazil's Opposition Shelters President from Scandal, for Now. New York times, August 14.Google Scholar
Rua, Mariadas, Graças, 1997. Comportamento eleitoral em Brasília: a eleiçáo presidencial de 1994. In Brasília: construção do cotidiano, ed. Brasilmar, Nunes. Brasília: Paralelo.Google Scholar
Schwartsman, Alexandre. 2002. No Free Lunch: Lula in the Sky with Diamonds. Bba Economic Research on Brazil May 13.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001a. Economic Reforms and Public Opinion in Fujimori's Peru. In Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies, ed. Stokes, . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 188.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001b. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veja, 2001. Até onde vai o risco do contágio. December 26.Google Scholar
Vox Populi. Presidential election data sets. <http://www.voxpopuli.com.br>..>Google Scholar