Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:24:04.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reform without Losers: The Symbolic Economy of Civil Service Reform in Uruguay, 1995–96

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Francisco Panizza
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between ideas, interests, and institutions in the 1996 reform of the civil service in Uruguay. Beneath the appearance of a process led by technocratic principles, the reform's agenda and content were shaped by legitimating principles, strongly institutionalized interests, and the political legacy of earlier failed reform attempts. Reformers sought a strategy of a reform “without losers,” which, instead of gathering support for adoption and implementation, sought to minimize opposition. This deliberately low-profile strategy left people unaware of the reform's achievements and thereby reinforced a political culture that has made resistance to change both a political virtue and an inescapable condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2004 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuña, Carlos H., and William, C. Smith. 1994. The Political Economy of Structural Adjustment: The Logic of Support and Opposition to Neoliberal Reform. In Latin America's Political Economy in the Age of Neoliberal Reform, ed. Smith, Acuna, and Eduardo, A. Gamarra. New Brunswick: Transaction. 17–65.Google Scholar
Astori, Danilo. 2001. Senator, Encuentro Progresista-Frente Amplio (Ep-Fa). Author interview. Montevideo, February 19.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., and Anne, O. Krueger, eds. 1993. Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Reform. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benavente, María Dolores. 1995. Memoranda to Consejo Superior Empresarial. Five internal memoranda. May 12.Google Scholar
Benavente, María Dolores. 2001. Economic adviser to the National Chamber of Commerce; delegate from the Consejo Superior Empresarial (Cosupe) to the Comisión Sectorial para la Reforma del Estado. Author interview. Montevideo, March 3.Google Scholar
Blake, Charles H. 1998. Economic Reform and Democratization in Argentina and Uruguay: the Tortoise and the Hare Revisited Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40, 3 (Fall): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 1997. Any More Bright Ideas? the Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy. Comparative Politics 29, 1 (January): 229–50.Google Scholar
Bresser, Pereira, Luiz, Carlos. 1999. Reflections of a Reformer: Amending the Constitution in Democratic Brazil. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Buquet, Daniel, Daniel, Chasquetti, and Juan Andres, Moraes. 1998. Fragmentatión politico y gobierno en el Uruguay: jun enfermo imaginario? Montevideo: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1992, Beyond Transitions to Democracy in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 24, 3: 665–84.Google Scholar
Cedrola, Gerardo. 2001. Affiliated with Booz-Allen Consultants. Author interview. Montevideo, March 5.Google Scholar
Cifra, . 1993 Parecen crecer las oportunidades de vivir mejor. Survey on Uruguayans' attitudes toward the state. El País (Montevideo), June 20.Google Scholar
Cobas, Eduardo. 2001. Former Executive Secretary, Comité Ejecutivo para la Reforma del Estado (Cepre). Author interview. Montevideo, February 2.Google Scholar
Factum, . 2000a. Indice Factum 7, 7 (August-September). Poll results. Montevideo: Factum.Google Scholar
Factum, . 2000b. Indice Factum 7, 10 (October). Montevideo: Factum.Google Scholar
Filgueira, Fernando, and Jorge, Papadópulos. 1997. Putting Conservatism to Good Use? Long Crisis and Vetoed Alternatives in Uruguay. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas, Chalmers et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 360–87.Google Scholar
Finch, Henry. 1999 Uruguay. In Case Studies in Latin American Political Economy, ed. Julia, Buxton and Nicola, Phillips. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 82–106.Google Scholar
Foro, Batllista. n.d. El Uruguay entre todos. Programa 2000. Pamphlet. Montevideo: Foro Batllista.Google Scholar
Garcé, Adolfo. 2002. Ideas y competencia politico en Uruguay (1960–1973): revisando elfracaso de la CIDE. Montevideo: Trilce.Google Scholar
Garcé, Adolfo, and Yaffé, J.. 1999. Un cambio a la uruguaya. Postdata (Montevideo), December 17; 85–87.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politicians' Dilemma: Reforming the State in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghio, José María. 1999. The Politics of Administrative Reform in Argentina. Paper prepared for the Conference on the Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing and Transition Countries, Washington, Dc, July 15.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Robert, O. Keohane. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Goldstein, and Keohane, . Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 3–30.Google Scholar
Griggs, S., and David, Howarth. 2001. Making Sense of Ambiguity: Ideas, Interests and Policy Discourse. Paper prepared for the 51st Political Studies Association Conference, Manchester, U.K., April 10–12.Google Scholar
Guardini, Jorge. 2001. Former Senator, Partido Nacional. Author interview. Montevideo, February 20.Google Scholar
Hägerström, Max. 2001. World Bank representative in Uruguay. Author interview. Buenos Aires, March 6.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Robert, Kaufman. 1992. Institutions and Economic Adjustment. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, ed. Haggard, and Kaufman, . Princeton: Princeton University Press. 4–37.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Robert, Kaufman. 1997. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Comparative Politics 29, 3: 263–83.Google Scholar
Hall, John O. 1954. La administratión pública en el Uruguay. Sugerenciaspara una reforma de la organizatión administrativa. Montevideo: Instituto Nacional del Libro.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1992. The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s. In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, ed. Sven, Steinmo, Kathleen, Thelen, and Frank, Longstreth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 90–113.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. Comparative Politics 25, 3: 275–96.Google Scholar
Heredia, Blanca, and Ben Ross, Schneider. 2003. Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Hira, Anil. 1998. Ideas and Economic Policy in Latin America: Regional, National, and Organizational Case Studies. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 1994. Explaining Economic Policy Reversals. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 1984. Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John G. 1993. Creating Yesterday's New World Order: Keynesian New Thinking and the Anglo-American Post-War Settlement. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Judith, Goldstein and Robert, O. Keohane. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 57–80.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, John K. 1995. Much Ado about Ideas: the Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy. World Politics 47, 2 (January): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. External Influence, Conditionality, and the Politics of Adjustment. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, ed. Stephen, Haggard and Robert, Kaufman. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 89–136.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael. 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1999. The Global Revolution: Reforming Government Sector Management. In Reforming the State: Managerial Public Administration in Latin America, ed. Luiz Carlos Bresser, Pereira and Peter, Spink. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 41–74.Google Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge, ed. 2001. Tipos de presidencialismo y coaliciones politicas en America Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Llanos, Mariana. 2001. Understanding Presidential Power in Argentina: a Study of the Policy of Privatisation in the 1990s. Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 1 (February): 67–99.Google Scholar
Martínez, Ernesto. 2001. Inter-American Development Bank representative in Uruguay. Author interview. Montevideo, March 9.Google Scholar
Moraes, Hector. 2001. Organization Secretary, Confederación de Funcionarios del Estado (Cofe). Author interview. Montevideo, February 8.Google Scholar
Mosca, Luis. 2001. Minister of Economy and Finance, Uruguay, 1995–2000. Author interview. Montevideo, March 9.Google Scholar
Narbondo, Pedro, and Conrado, Ramos. 2000. Reforma administrativa y capacidad estatal de conducción. Mimeograph. Montevideo: Institute de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
Nazarenko, Natalia. 2001. Adviser, Oficina Nacional del Servicio Civil (Onsc). Author interview. Montevideo, March 14.Google Scholar
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oszlak, Oscar. 1972. Diagnóstico de la administracion pública uruguaya. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 1990. Uruguay, batllismo y después. Montevideo: Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
Posada, Ivan. 2001. Deputy, Nuevo Espacio. Author interview. Montevideo, February 8.Google Scholar
Presidencia de la República Oriental del Uruguay (Presidencia). 1998. La reforma administrativa del estado. Montevideo: Oficina de Planeamiento y Presupuesto.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rein, M., and Donald, Schon. 1993. Reframing Policy Discourse. In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, ed. Frank, Fischer and John, Forester. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Ana Laura. 2001. Ph.D. candidate researching evaluation regimes in Uruguay's public administration. Author interview. Montevideo, March 2.Google Scholar
Roth, Philip. 2000. The Human Stain: A Novel. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, Julio Maria. 2001. Former President of Uruguay (1995–2000); Leader, Foro Batllista faction, Colorado Party. Author interview. Montevideo, February 19.Google Scholar
Sayagués Laso, Enrique. 1998. Tratado de derecho administrativo uruguayo. 7th ed.. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Katherine. 1991. Ideas and Institutions. Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spink, Peter. 1999. Possibilities and Political Imperatives: Seventy Years of Administrative Reform in Latin America. In Reforming the State: Managerial Public Administration in Latin America, ed. Luiz Carlos Bresser, Pereira and Spink, . Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Townshend, Jules. 2003. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: a New Paradigm from the Essex School? (review article). British fournal of Politics and International Relations 5, 1 (February): 129–42.Google Scholar
Williamson, John, ed. 1994. The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Louis. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zac, Lilian. 1989. The Politics of Silence: Logical Resources and the Argentinean Military Discourse, 1976–1980. Ph.D. diss., University of Essex.Google Scholar