Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:08:28.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Societal Consequences of Market Reform in Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Moisés Arce
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes how market reform policies already in place affect social interests, and the feedback effects of those interests on reform processes. The variety of societal responses includes the creation of new societal organizations, reflecting the variable content and asymmetrical distribution of costs and benefits of the policies implemented. Because of this variety even in Peru, where the disorganizing effects of neoliberal reform appear to be strongest, it would seem that the societal impact of economic reform elsewhere in Latin America would also warrant more careful examination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , Spring 2006 , pp. 27 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcázar, Lorena, and Erik, Wachtenheim. 2001. Determinants of Project Success: Case Study of FONCODES. Working paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Altobelli, Laura. 2002. Participatión comunitaria en la salud: la experiencia peruana en los CLAS. In La salud peruana en el siglo XXI: retos y propuestas de política, ed. Juan, Arroyo. Lima: Consorcio de Investigatión Económica y Social. 303–54.Google Scholar
Altobelli, Laura, and Jorge, Pancorvo. 2000. Shared Health Administration Program and Local Health Administration Associations (CLAS) in Peru. Working paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Anderson, Karen M. 2001. The Politics of Retrenchment in a Social Democratic Welfare State: Reform of Swedish Pensions and Unemployment Insurance. Comparative Political Studies 34, 9 (November): 1063–91.Google Scholar
Apoyo, S. A. 1991. Informe de opinión (March). Lima: Apoyo.Google Scholar
Apoyo, S. A. 1995. Tercera evaluatión de proyectos financiados por FONCODES. Lima: Apoyo.Google Scholar
Apoyo, S. A. 1997. Cuarta evaluatión de proyectos financiados por FONCODES. Lima: Apoyo.Google Scholar
Apoyo, S. A. 1998. Informe de opinión (February). Lima: Apoyo.Google Scholar
Apoyo, S. A. 2000. Informe de opinión (September). Lima: Apoyo.Google Scholar
Arias, Luis. 1995. Un análisis de las modificaciones del impuesto a la renta. Moneda 90 (December): 52–55.Google Scholar
Arroyo, Juan. 2000. Salud: la reforma silenciosa. Lima: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1994. Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters. American Political Science Review 88, 1 (March): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boylan, Delia M. 2001. Democratization and Institutional Change in Mexico: the Logic of Partial Insulation. Comparative Political Studies 34, 1 (February): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büchi, Hernan. 1996. Social Security Reform in Chile. In Bigger Economies, Smaller Governments: Privatization in Latin America, ed. William, Glade and Rossana, Corona. Boulder: Westview Press. 59–88.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell. 1994. Democracy and Authoritarianism in Peru: Political Coalitions and Social Change. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Castillo, Manuel, and Andrés, Quispe. 1996. Reforma estructuraly reconversión empresarial: conflictosy desafios. Lima: DESCO.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Douglas A., Scott, B. Martin, and Kerianne, Piester. 1997. Associative Networks: New Structures of Representation for the Popular Sectors? In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas, A. Chalmers, Carlos, M. Vilas, Katherine, Hite, Scott, B. Martin, Kerianne, Piester, and Monique, Segarra. New York: Oxford University Press. 543–82.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Lima). El cierra puertas de mercados fue generalizado. July 22: A12.Google Scholar
El Comercio (Lima). 1998. Despiden a funcionarios que no quisieron colaborar con campaña electoral. September 14.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine. 1996. A Deficit of Democratic Authenticity: Political Linkage and the Public in Andean Polities. Studies in Comparative International Development 31, 3 (Autumn): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congreso de la República. 2003. Acciones para erradicar la corrupción en el estado peruano: comisión investigadora de los casos de corrupción. CD-ROM. Lima: Congreso de la República.Google Scholar
Cortez, Rafael. 1998. Equidad y calidad de los servicios de salud. Lima: Centra de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacífico.Google Scholar
Coder, Julio. 1994. Política y sociedad en el Perú: cambios y continuidades. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Cruz-Saco, María. 1998. The Pension System Reform in Peru: Economic Rationale Versus Political Will. In Do Options Exist? The Reform of Pension and Health Care Systems in Latin America, ed. Cruz, Saco and Carmelo, Mesa-Lago. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 165–85.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1996. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco. 1994. The Politics of Tax Revolutions in Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. Paper prepared for the 18th International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Atlanta, March.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco. 2002. Desarrollo institucional de SUNAT: factores de éxito y fracaso. Aportes al debate no. 6. Lima: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco. 2003. Riqueza económica y pobreza politica: reflexiones sobre las elites de poder en un país inestable. Lima: Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco, and Rosemary, Thorp. 1998. Reforming the State: a Study of the Peruvian Tax Reform. Oxford Development Studies 26, 2 (June): 133–51.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina. 2001. Gender Equity and Neoliberal Social Policy: Health Sector Reform in Peru. Ph. D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Francke, Pedro. 1997. Foncodes: Llega a los pobres Moneda 103 (June-July): 44–47.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Carol. 1994. Safety Nets, Politics, and the Poor: Transitions to Market Economics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol. 1998. Private Markets for Public Goods: Raising the Stakes in Economic Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Cheikh, Kane. 1998. Opportunistic Government or Sustaining Reform? Electoral Trends and Public-Expenditure Patterns in Peru, 1990–1995. Latin American Research Review 33, 1 (Winter): 67–104.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Moisés, Naím. 1998. The Political Economy of Institutional Reform in Latin America. In Beyond Trade-offs: Market Reforms and Equitable Growth in Latin America, ed. Nancy Birdsall, Graham, and Robert, H. Sabot. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press/Inter-American Development Bank. 321–59.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, Kaufman. 1992. Institutional and Economic Adjustments. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, ed. Haggard, and Kaufman, . Princeton: Princeton University Press. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2000. Political Development Revisited. Comparative Political Studies 33, 6 (August): 880–911.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel S. 1998. Winners Take All: the Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50, 2 (February): 203–34.Google Scholar
Heredia, Blanca, and Ben Ross, Schneider. 2003. The Political Economy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. In Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, ed. Schneider, and Heredia, . Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 1–29.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and John, D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, Miller, Juan, Carlos. 1990. Statement by the Governor of the Bank of Peru. Summary Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the IMF Board of Governors. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Instituto) Peruano de Economía. 1997. Reforma del régimen previsional peruano. Lima: Instituto Peruano de Economía.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. 1999. Approaches to the Study of State Reform in Latin American and Postsocialist Countries. Comparative Politics 31, 3 (April): 357–75.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World̂s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16, 4 (July): 677–715.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1972. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review 32, 4 (July): 298–310.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1999. Privatization South American Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maxfield, Sylvia. 1997. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus A. 2003. When Institutions Matter: A Comparison of the Politics of Administrative, Social Security, and Tax Reforms in Brazil. In Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, ed. Ben Ross, Schneider and Blanca, Heredia. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 211–49.Google Scholar
Naím, Moisés. 1995. Latin America's Journey to the Market: From Macroeconomic Shocks to Institutional Therapy. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan M. 1999. Reforming Health and Education: The World Bank, the IDB, and Complex Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan M., ed. 1990. Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5, 1 (January): 55–69.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Gabriel, Hugo, Eyzaquirre, Rosa, María Palacios, and Pierina, Pollarolo. 1999. La economía política de las reformas institucionales en el Perú: los casos de educación, salud, y pensiones. Working Paper R-348. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Panfichi, Aldo. 1997. The Authoritarian Alternative: “Anti-Politics” in the Popular Sectors of Lima. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas, A. Chalmers, Carlos, M. Vilas, Katherine, Hite, Scott, B. Martin, Kerianne, Piester, and Monique, Segarra. New York: Oxford University Press. 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, Manuel Jr., and Carol, Wise. 1999. The Politics of Second-Generation Reform. Journal of Democracy 10, 3 (July): 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perú Económico. (Lima). 1997a. Las obras de Foncodes. May: 23–24.Google Scholar
Perú Económico. (Lima). 1997b. Vive la cédula viva. May: 4–5.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45, 4 (July): 595–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1993. The Neoliberal Fallacy. In Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Revisited, ed. Larry, Diamond and Marc, F. Plattner. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. 39–53.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1998. The Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 33, 2 (Summer): 3–29.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: the Peruvian Case. World Politcs 48, 1 (October): 82–116.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1998. Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (Foncodes), 1991–1995. American Political Science Review 94, 2 (June): 289–304.Google Scholar
Schamis, Hector. 1999. Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America. World Politics 51, 2 (January): 236–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Helen, Ingram. 1993. Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review 87, 2 (June): 334–47.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1975. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sharp, Elaine B. 1994. The Dynamics of Issue Expansion: Cases from Disability Rights and Fetal Research Controversy. Journal of Politics 56, 4 (November): 919–39.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 1999. Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. World Politics 51, 2 (January): 173–204.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 1998. Funding the Welfare State: Globalization and the Taxation of Business in Advanced Market Economies. Political Studies 46, 4: 671–92.Google Scholar
Taliercio, Robert R. Jr., and Michael, Engelschalk. 2001. Strengthening Peru's Tax Agency. PREMnotes 60 (November): 1–4.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 2000. Taxation in Latin America in the Last Decade. Working Paper 76. Stanford: Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Teichman, Judith. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph S., and Allison, M. Garland. 2000. Social Development in Latin America: The Politics of Reform. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Vega-Centeno, Máximo, and María, Remenyi. 1996. El sistema previsional en el perú: sistema nacional de pensiones vs. sistema privado de pensiones. Economía 19, 37–38: 291–404.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q., ed. 1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Report: The State in a Changing World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1999. Poverty and Social Developments in Peru, 1994–1997. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 1999. Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Posdiberal Challenge in Latin America. World Politics 52, 1 (October): 76–104.Google Scholar
Zermeño, Sergio. 1989. El regreso de líder: crisis, neoliberalismo y desorden. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 51, 4 (October–December): 115–50.Google Scholar