Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:37:38.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origins of Security Cooperation in the Southern Cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

João Resende-Santos*
Affiliation:
Bentley College, University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Argentine-Brazilian relations have undergone a remarkable transformation over the last two decades, from enduring rivalry to cooperation. Dating back to the late 1970s, security cooperation has been a byproduct of two different sets of factors, strategic and military organizational, that propelled the two countries independently but simultaneously toward peaceful settlement. The 1979–80 settlement of disputes over hydroelectric power and nuclear technology not only ended centuries of militarized competition but established the first institutional structures of what is today one of the world's most durable security regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, Maria, Helena, Moreira 1985. State and Opposition in Military Brazil Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Aravena, Félix, ed. 1999. Argentina, Brasil y Chile: integración y seguridad Santiago: Nueva Sociedad/FLACSO.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1964. Memoria de las relaciones entre Brasil y Argentina durante el año 1964.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1968. Memorandum No. 184, under-Secretary to Amre. September 4.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1974a. Memorandum, unnumbered, Argentine Consulate in Brazil. April 5.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1974b. Amre Memorandum. May 4.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1974c. Ambassador José María Alvarez de Toledo. Speech. Document No. 2104. November 20.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1976. Gen.-Pres. Jorge Videla. Letter dated December 3.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1978a. Planes, programas, y estratégias para 1978. Document prepared by the Departamiento de América Latina.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1978b. Memorandum, unnumbered. June 15.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1979. Aumento en las reservas de uranio de Brasil. Memorandum from Ambassador Oscar Camillion [Camilión]. December 28.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1980a. Acuerdo de cooperación entre el Gobierno de la República Argentina y el Gobierno de la República Federativa del Brasíl para el desarrollo y la aplicación de los usos pacíficos de la energía nuclear. May 17.Google Scholar
Argentina. Archivo Histórico del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto, Caja Brasil (AMRE). 1980b. Memorandum de entendimiento relativa a consultas sobre asuntos de interes común. May 17.Google Scholar
Baffa, Ayrton. 1989. Nos porões do SNI: o retrato do monstro de cabeça oca Rio de Janeiro: Editora Objetiva.Google Scholar
Bandeira, Moníz. 1993. Estado nacional e política internacional na América Latina: o continente nas relações Argentina-Brasíl, 1930–1992 Brasília: UNB.Google Scholar
Burr, Robert N. 1965. By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, 1830–1905 Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, Jeffrey. 2000. On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42, 1 (Spring): 2342.Google Scholar
Child, Jack. 1985. Geopolitics and Conflict in South America: Quarrels Among Neighbors New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Contreiras, Hélio. 1998. Militares confissões: histõrias secretas do Brasil Rio de Janeiro: Mauad.Google Scholar
Costa Vaz, Alcides. 1999. La política exterior brasileña. in Aravena 1999 89124.Google Scholar
D'Araujo, Maria, and Celso, Castro, eds. 1997. Ernesto Geisel Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.Google Scholar
Diamint, Rut. 1999. Integración y seguridad: la dialética de los argentinos. in Aravena 1999 4573.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F., ed. 1998. The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., ed. 1998. International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
O Estado de São Paulo . 1979. Diálogo pode ser reaberto com Guerreiro e Pastor. March 8: 4.Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel. E. 1962. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo . 1979. Assinado o acordo tripartite. October 20: 6.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. 1981. O Brasíl pós-milagre Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Garrett, James L. 1985. The Beagle Channel Dispute: Confrontation and Negotiation in the Southern Cone. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27, 3 (Fall): 81109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisel, Ernesto. 1974. Discursos. Vol. I. Brasília: Assesoria de Impresa e Relações Públicas.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Paul, F. Diehl 1993. Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns. International Studies Quarterly 37, 2 (June): 147–72.Google Scholar
Góes, Walder 1978. O Brasíl do General Geisel: estudo do processo de tomada de decisão no regime militar-burocrãtico Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Góes, Walder 1984. O novo regime militar no Brasil. Dados 27: 361–76.Google Scholar
Góes, Walder, and Aspásia, Camargo. 1984. O drama da sucessão e a crise do regime Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Gorman, Stephen. 1979. Security, Influence and Nuclear Weapons: the Case of Argentina and Brazil. Parameters 9: 5265.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Ramiro. 1992. Lembranças de um empregado do Itamaraty São Paulo: Siciliano.Google Scholar
Guglialmelli, Juan, General. 1972. Argentina frente al “operativo misiones” del Brasil. Estratégia 19 (November-December: 716.Google Scholar
Guglialmelli, Juan, General. 1975. Argentina, Brasil, y la bomba atómica. Estratégia 30: 115.Google Scholar
Guglialmelli, Juan, General. 1976a. Argentina, Brasil, y la bomba atómica Buenos Aires: Tierra Nueva.Google Scholar
Guglialmelli, Juan, General. 1976b. Argentina: plan nuclear y presiones externas. Estratégia 42: 119.Google Scholar
Hirst, Mónica. 1996a. Democracia, seguridad e integración: América Latina en un mundo en transición Buenos Aires: Norma.Google Scholar
Hirst, Mónica. 1996b. The Foreign Policy of Brazil: from the Democratic Transition to Its Consolidation. in Muñoz and Tulchin 1996 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Practice of Civil-Military Relations Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1998. Security in Latin America. International Affairs 74, 3 (July): 529–47.Google Scholar
Jordán, Alberto. 1993. El Processo, 1976–1983 Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Jornal da República (São Paulo). 1979. Sorrisos, alívio. Enfim, há um acordo. October 20: 3.Google Scholar
Jornal do Brasil . 1979a. Silveira teme que proposta argentina invalide acordo. February 1: 18.Google Scholar
Jornal do Brasil . 1979b. Camillion retorna a Brasília com a resposta sobre Itaipu. March 5: 15.Google Scholar
Jornal do Brasil . 1979c. Guerreiro confia em acordo que agrade os três países em Itaipu. April 1: 36.Google Scholar
Jornal do Brasil . 1979d. Acordo Itaipu-Corpus vai ser assinado até o fim deste mês. October 7: 35.Google Scholar
Kelly, Phillip, and Jack, Child, eds. 1988. Geopolitics of the Southern Cone and Antarctica Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kucinski, Bernardo. 1982. Abertura: a história de uma crise São Paulo: Brasíl Debates.Google Scholar
Lagoa, Ana. 1983. SNI: como nasceu, como funciona Rio de Janeiro: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Lanus, Juan. 1984. De Hapúltepec al Beagle: política exterior argentina, 1945–1980 Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1973. The Future of an Authoritarian Situation or the Institutionalization of an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Brazil. In Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future, ed. Alfred, Stepan. New Haven: Yale University Press. 233–56.Google Scholar
Maciel, George, Ambassador. 1994. O regime militar e o Itamaraty. In 1964: 30 anos depois, ed. Eduardo, Raposo. Rio de Janeiro: Agir. 167–72.Google Scholar
Malheiros, Tánia. 1993. Brasíl, a bomba oculta: o programa nuclear brasileiro Rio de Janeiro: Gryphus.Google Scholar
Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, David R., ed. 1999. Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Martins, Luciano. 1986. The “Liberalization” of Authoritarian Rule in Brazil. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America, ed. Guillermo, O'Donnell, Philippe, C. Schmitter, and Laurence, Whitehead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 7794.Google Scholar
Mathias, Suzeley. 1995. Distensão no Brasíl: o projeto militar, 1973–1979 São Paulo: Papirus.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Heraldo, and Joseph, Tulchin, eds. 1984. Latin American Nations in World Politics Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Phillip 1996. 2d edition. Latin American Nations in World Politics Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Eliézer. 1994. De Geisel a Collor: forças armadas, transição e democracia São Paulo: Papirus.Google Scholar
Pedone, Luis. 1989. State Autonomy, Political Power, and Public Policy: a Study of Brazilian Development. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Perina, Rúben M., and Roberto, Russell, eds. 1988. Argentina en el mundo, 1973–1987 Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 1985. The Fall of Military Rule in Argentina: 1976–1983. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27, 2 (Summer): 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David. 2000. Will Soldiers Follow? Economic Integration and Regional Security in the Southern Cone. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42, 1 (Spring): 4369.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42: 427–60.Google Scholar
Rehder, Paulo. 1990. Sucessão em tempo de ditadura: como o Figueiredo foi imposto ao pais e aos militares Rio de Janeiro: Europa.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1989. Military Rule in Latin America Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Rosa, J. Elíseo. 1983. Economics, Politics, and Hydroelectric Power: the Paraná River Basin. Latin American Research Review 18, 3: 77107.Google Scholar
Sagre, María. 1990. La cuestión Itaipú-Corpus: el punto de inflexión en las relaciones argentino-brasileñas Buenos Aires: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Sanguenetti, Júlio. 1972. Geopolítica de la cuenca del plata. Estratégia 19 (November-December: 7178.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ronald. 1976. Brazil: Foreign Policy of a Future World Power Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Selcher, Wayne. 1978. Brazil's Multilateral Relations: Between First and Third Worlds Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Selcher, Wayne 1981. Brazil in the International System: The Rise of a Middle Power Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Hélio, and Maria, C. Ribas 1983. Os presidentes: Ernesto Geisel Rio de Janeiro: Comunicão Tres.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas. 1988. The Politics of Military Rule in Brazil, 1964–85 New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soares, Glaúcio, Maria, C. D'Araujo, and Celso, Castro, eds. 1995. A volta aos quarteís: a memória militar sobre a abertura Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.Google Scholar
Soares Lima, Maria. 1986. The Political Economy of Brazilian Foreign Policy: Nuclear Energy, Trade, and Itaipú. Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Soares Lima, Maria, and Gerson, Moura. 1983. A trajetória do pragmatismo: uma análise da política externa brasileira. Dados 25: 349–64.Google Scholar
Solingen, Ethel. 1994. The Political Economy of Nuclear Restraint. International Security 19, 2 (Fall): 126–69.Google Scholar
Solingen, Ethel. 1996. Industrial Policy, Technology, and International Bargaining: Designing Nuclear Industries in Argentina and Brazil Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1973. The New Professionalism of Internal Warfare and Military Role Expansion. In Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future, ed. Stepan, New Haven: Yale University Press. 4768.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1983. O que estão pensando os militares. Novos Estudos 2: 27.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stumpf, André, and Merval, Pereira Filho. 1979. A segunda guerra: sucessão de Geisel São Paulo: Brasilense.Google Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph. 1984. Authoritarian Regimes and Foreign Policy: the Case of Argentina in Muñoz and Tulchin 1984. 186–99.Google Scholar
Ustra, C. 1987. Rompendo o silêncio: OBAN, DOI/CODI 29 Sep 70–23 Jan 74 Brasília: Editerra.Google Scholar
Vásquez, John. 1993. The War Puzzle Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viamonte, José Maria. 1974. Desarrollo e grandeza: Brasil como poténcia emergente. Estratégia 30 (September-October: 1627.Google Scholar
World Bank. 199596. World Bank Tables. Annual world economic data. Series. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar