Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T15:35:35.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scholarly Research on U.S.-Latin American Relations: Where Does the Field Stand?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mariano E. Bertucci
Mariano E. Bertucci*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California mbertucc@usc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article draws on a new dataset to depict the scope, objectives, and methods of research in the field of U.S.-Latin American relations over the past quarter-century. The key findings are that the study of U.S.-Latin American relations focuses largely on foreign policy analysis, is mainly descriptive, relies overwhelmingly on qualitative methods, and is fairly detached from the main research trends in international relations. In light of this assessment, the article emphasizes the need to pay more attention to issues of theory development and explanation in this subfield of international relations.

Type
Research Note
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , Winter 2013 , pp. 119 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav, and Iain Johnston, Alastair, eds. 2007. Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1997. Area Studies and the Discipline: a Useful Controversy? PS: Political Science and Politics 30, 2: 166–69.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, Barth, Aharo, and Rutherford, Kenneth. 2003. Do We Preach What We Practice? a Survey of Methods in Political Science Journals and Curricula. PS: Political Science and Politics 36, 3: 373–78.Google Scholar
Bertucci, Mariano E., Borges-Herrero, Fabián, and Fuentes-Julio, Claudia. Forthcoming. Toward Best Practices in Scholar-Practitioner Relations: Insights from the Field of Inter-American Affairs. International Studies Perspectives.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., Entwisle, Barbara, and Alderson, Arthur S.. 1993. Macrocomparative Research Methods. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 321–51.Google Scholar
Borja Tamayo, Arturo. 2001. The New Federalism in Mexico and Foreign Economic Policy: an Alternative Two-Level Game Analysis of the Metalclad Case. Latin American Politics and Society 43, 4 (Winter): 67–90.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 1992. Beyond Hegemony: U.S.-Latin American Relations in a New World Order? Latin American Research Review 27, 3: 165–76.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2002. Domestic Politics and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 46, 1: 1–9.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Waever, Ole. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cottam, Martha. 1994. Images and Interventions: U.S. Policies in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Crandall, Russell C., 2008. The United States and Latin America After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael. 1993. When the Third World Matters: Latin America and the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 1978. Consensus and Divergence: the State of the Literature on Inter-American Relations in the 1970s. Latin American Research Review 13, 1: 87–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 2007. International Cooperation in Latin America: the Design of Regional Institutions by Slow Accretion. In Acharya and Johnston 2007. 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). 2009. Statistical Yearbook for Latin American and the Caribbean. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1989. Declining Hegemony and Assertive Industrialization: U.S.-Brazil Conflict in the Computer Industry. International Organization 43, 2: 207–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander, and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie. 1998. Zones of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie. 2005. The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin American Experience, 1881–2001. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1989. Hegemonía y empresario políticos, dependencia, democratización y cooperación en las Américas. Estudios Internacionales 22, 86: 183–223.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepgold, Joseph, and Nincic, Miroslav. 2002. Beyond the Ivory Tower: International Relations Theory and the Issue of Policy Relevance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, Barry S., 2006. A Desultory Defense of Democracy: Oas Resolution 1080 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 3 (Fall): 93–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, James D., Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2005. Teaching and Research in International Politics: Surveying Trends in Faculty Opinion and Publishing. Paper prepared for the 46th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, March 1–5. http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu/projects/trip/publications.php Google Scholar
Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E.. 1995. Introduction. In Global Dangers: Changing Dimensions of International Security, ed. Lynn-Jones, and Miller, . Cambridge: MIT Press. 3–14.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2009. The American School of Ipe. Review of International Political Economy 16, 1: 6–33.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Oakes, Amy, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2007. The International Relations Discipline, 1980–2006. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30—September 12. http://irtheoryandpractice.wm.edu/projects/trip/publications.php Google Scholar
Mares, David. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven E., 2001. International Security at Twenty-Five: from One World to Another. International Security 26, 1: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Snyder, Richard. 2007. Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: an Analysis of Leading Journals. Comparative Political Studies 40, 1: 5–31.Google Scholar
Obama, Barak. 2011. Remarks by President Obama on Latin America in Santiago, Chile. March 21. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/21/remarks-president-obama-latin-america-santiago-chile. Accessed July 5, 2012.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Thomas F., 2009. Interventions, Conventional and Unconventional: Current Scholarship on Inter-American Relations. Latin American Research Review 44, 1: 257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, John, ed. 2006. Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pahre, Robert, ed. 2006. Democratic Foreign Policy Making: Problems of Divided Government and International Cooperation. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahre, Robert. 2008. Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century: The Agreeable Customs of 1815–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A., 1991. Preempting Revolutions: the Boundaries of U.S. Influence. International Security 15, 4: 54–86.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A., 2001. Exiting the Whirlpool: U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Latin America and the Caribbean. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert A., and Long, Thomas. 2010. The Cold War and Its Aftermath in the Americas: the Search for a Synthetic Interpretation of U.S. Policy. Latin American Research Review 45, 3: 261–73.Google Scholar
Resende-Santos, João. 2007. Neorealism, States, and the Modern Mass Army. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 1990. Bullying and Bargaining: the United States, Nicaragua, and Conflict Resolution in Central America. International Security 15, 2: 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santa-Cruz, Arturo. 2005. International Election Monitoring, Sovereignty, and the Western Hemisphere Idea: The Emergence of an International Norm. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2004. Mixed Signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 2008. Talons of the Eagle: Latin America, the United States, and the World. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 2012. U.S.-Latin American Relations: Power, Politics, and Cooperation. In Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics, ed. Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah J.. New York: Routledge. 335–47.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan, and Wendt, Alexander. 2009. Why There is International Theory Now. International Theory 1, 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., 2008. Latin American Ir and the Primacy of lo práctico . International Studies Review 10: 735–48.Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., 2009. Latin America: Still Policy Dependent After All These Years? In International Relations Scholarship Around the World, ed. Tickner, and Waever, Ole. New York: Routledge. 32–52.Google Scholar
Time. 2007. A South American Arms Race? December 21. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1697776,00.html Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, and Goodfield, June. 1999. The Fabric of the Heavens: The Development of Astronomy and Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Gregory. 2009. Recent Work on U.S.-Latin American Relations. Latin American Research Review 44, 1: 247–56.Google Scholar