Article contents
After the Washington Consensus; The Limits to Democratization and Development in Latin America
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2022
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0023879100019920/resource/name/firstPage-S0023879100019920a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Essays
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2006 by the University of Texas Press
Footnotes
The author would like to thank William Smith for his helpful comments.
References
1. For example, see the debate on neoliberalism between Evelyne Huber and Fred Solt, “Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism,” and David Walton, “Neoliberalism in Latin America: Good, Bad, or Incomplete,” in Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 150–164 and 165–183 (2004).
2. See for example, Sylvia Maxfield, “Alternatives to Cope with Financial Instability.” In, Ana Margheritis, ed., Latin American Democracies in the New Global Economy. Miami: University of Miami, North-South Center Press, 2003.
3. For example, Carlos Vilas makes a powerful statement to that effect in “Inequality and the Dismantling of Citizenship in Latin America.” NACLA Report on the Americas May/June 1997.
4. Guillermo O'Donnell, Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.
5. Judith Teichman, The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.
6. Peter Evans, Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
- 4
- Cited by