Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T18:39:46.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attention Deficits: Why Politicians Ignore Defense Policy in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

David Pion-Berlin  and
Harold Trinkunas
David Pion-Berlin
Affiliation:
University of California at Riverside
Harold Trinkunas
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Interest in defense issues among Latin American politicians has faded with the advent of widespread democratization in the region and the retreat of the armed forces to their barracks. Defense policy is rarely subject to the same level of public scrutiny and debate as other major policy issues faced by the region, such as health, education, and public safety. This is puzzling because by ignoring defense policy, civilian leaders in the region risk ceding authority to their militaries, allowing them a degree of self-management and undermining the consolidation of democratic civilian control of the armed forces. This article explains civilian politicians' inattention to defense as a function of three factors: a historical path that has produced armed forces with limited capabilities that are more often a threat to their own governments than their neighbors; a relatively benign international threat environment in Latin America that makes neglect of defense policy a low-risk proposition; and the low importance that voters assign to the provision of the national defense as either a public or a private good. Under these circumstances, it is rational for most civilian politicians to ignore defense policy and focus their attention instead on coup avoidance.

Resumen

Resumen

El interés que los políticos latinoamericanos tienen acerca de los temas de defensa ha disminuido con la democratización de la región y el regreso de las fuerzas armadas a sus cuarteles. Las políticas de defensa rara vez causan el nivel de debate público que provocan otras políticas importantes para la región, tales como salud, educación y seguridad ciudadana. Esto es desconcertante ya que al ignorar la política de defensa, el liderazgo civil cede autoridad a los militares, permitiéndoles un grado de auto-gestión que puede socavar la consolidación de la conducción civil sobre las fuerzas armadas. Este artículo explica la falta de atención de políticos civiles a la defensa en función de tres factores: un desarrollo histórico que ha debilitado a las fuerzas armadas dejándolas con capacidades limitadas que, frecuentemente, son una mayor amenaza para sus propios gobiernos que para los de sus vecinos; un ambiente internacional mas bien benigno que disminuye el riesgo de la falta de atención a la defensa en América Latina; y la baja importancia que los electores asignan a la defensa nacional como bien público o privado. Bajo estas circunstancias, ignorar la política de defensa es racional para la mayoría de los políticos civiles, los cuales limitan su atención a evitar golpes de estado.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , October 2007 , pp. 76 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the University of Texas Press

References

Agüero, Felipe 1995 Soldiers, Civilians and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Alcántara Sáez, Manuel 2000 “South American Legislatures: Thinking about Economic Integration and Defense Policy.” CSIS Report (November 16), The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Barletta, Michael, and Trinkunas, Harold 2004 “Regime Type and Regional Security in Latin America: Toward a ”Balance of Identity“ Theory.” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, edited by Paul, T. V., Wirtz, James J., and Fortmann, Michel, 334–359. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayoumi, Tamim, Hewitt, Daniel, and Symansky, Steven 1993 “The Impact of Worldwide Military Spending Cuts on Developing Countries,” IMF Working Papers, November 1. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/doctext.cfm?docno=WPIEA0861993 (accessed April 2, 2007).Google Scholar
Bowman, Kirk 2002 Militarization, Democracy, and Development: The Perils of Praetorianism in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C. 2005 “Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: The Hedgehog and the Fox Revisited.” Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad 19 (1): 111–131.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., and Tollefson, Scott D. 2006 Who Guards the Guardians and How: Democratic Civil-Military Relations. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, Miguel Angel 2003 Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Citizens for Global Solutions 2005 “Bilateral Immunity Agreements” Web page, 1–2. http://oldsite.globalsolutions.org/programs/lawjustice/ice/bias/bias_home.htmlGoogle Scholar
Congressional Budget Office 2001 “Chapter 3. Paying for NATO's Common Costs.” In NATO Budget Sharing After Enlargement, http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=2976&sequence=4Google Scholar
Desch, Michael C. 1999 Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Diamint, Rut 2002 Democracia y seguridad en America Latina. Buenos Aires: Nuevohacer.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge 2005 Boundary Disputes in Latin America. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
Garcia, Prudencio 1995 El drama de la autonomía militar. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Garrett, J. L. 1985 “The Beagle Channel Dispute.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27 (3): 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, Monica, and Nogueira, João Pontes 2002 Ecuador vs. Peru: Peacemaking Amid Rivalry. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy 1997 Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew 1998 “An Emerging Security Community in South America?” In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, 228–264. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew 2005-2006 The Military Balance, London: IISS.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) 1997 “Reducing Unproductive Expenditures is Important for Fiscal Adjustment.” IMF Survey, February 24, 49–51.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2001 “Social Dimensions of the IMF's Policy Dialogue: A Fact Sheet.” March. http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/social.htm (accessed April 2, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie 1998 Zones of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Klare, Michael, and Anderson, David 1996 “A Scourge of Guns: The Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons in Latin America.” Arms Sales Monitoring Project, Federation of American Scientists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
Knight, Malcolm, et al. 1995 “The Peace Dividend: Military Spending Cuts and Economic Growth,” IMF Working Papers, May 1. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/doctext.cfm?docno=WPIEA0531995Google Scholar
Kwasniewski, Aleksander 1997 “Poland in NATO: Opportunities and Challenges.” NATO web edition 45 (5) Sept-Oct. www.nato.int/docu/review/1997/9705–02.htm.Google Scholar
Leogrande, William M. 1998 Our Own Backyard: The United States in Central America, 1977–1992. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lopez-Alves, Fernando 2000 State Formation and Democracy in Latin America, 1810–1900. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian 1999 For la Patria: Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Books.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce 1993 “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 624–638.Google Scholar
Mares, David 2001 Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974 Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott 2002 “Explaining Legislative Politics in Latin America.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, edited by Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito, 413–444. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mott IV, William H. 2002 United States Military Assistance: An Empirical Perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Newsweek 1978 “The Beagle War” November 13, 1978 (Lexis-Nexis online).Google Scholar
Nunn, Frederick M. 1983 Yesterday's Soldiers: European Military Professionalism in South America, 1890–1940. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS) 2003 Special Conference on Security, Mexico City, Mexico, OEA/Ser.K/XXXVIII, 28 October, 2–4.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David 2000 “Will Soldiers Follow? Economic Integration and Regional Security in the Southern Cone.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42 (1): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David 2005 “Political Management of the Military in Latin America” Military Review, 85 (January-February): 19–31.Google Scholar
Red de Seguridad y Defensa de América Latina (RESDAL) 2004 “Parlamento y defensa: Comisiones parlamentarias en América Latina abocadas en la defensa nacional.” Available at http://www.resdal.org.ar/main-parlamento-defensa.html (accessed May 2007).Google Scholar
Rial, Juan 2005 “Las normas jurídicas y las organizaciones de la defensa.” In RESDAL, Atlas Comparativo de la Defensa en América Latina, 28–29. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ser 2000.Google Scholar
Rouquié, Alain 1987 The Military and the State in Latin America. Trans. Paul Sigmund. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rundquist, Barry S., and Carsey, Thomas M. 2002 The Distributive Politics of Military Procurement. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Scheetz, Thomas. 2002 “Military Expenditure and Development in Latin America.” In Arming the South: The Economics of Military Expenditures, Arms Production and Arms Trade in Developing Countries, edited by Brauer, Jurgen and Dunne, J. Paul. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Scheina, Robert L. 2003 Latin America's Wars: The Age of the Caudillo, 1791–1899 (Vol 1). Washington, DC: Brassey's.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) 2005 Yearbook, online at www.SIPRI.ORG/contents/milap/aprod/sipridata.html.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1992 Coercion, Capital, and European States, A.D. 990–1992. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold 1999 “Crafting Civilian Control of the Armed Forces in New Democracies.” PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold 2000 “Crafting Civilian Control in Emerging Democracies: Argentina and Venezuela.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42 (3): 77–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold 2005 Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar