Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:19:30.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of the “Temporary Mexican”: American Agriculture, the US Congress, and the 1920 Hearings on the Temporary Admission of Illiterate Mexican Laborers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Alexandra Filindra
Alexandra Filindra*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Drawing on the literature on the social construction of public policy, this article pinpoints the emergence of the trope of the “temporary Mexican,” that is, the migrant farm laborer, to the 1920 congressional hearings on the “admission of illiterate Mexican laborers.” I argue that this construction was the brainchild of southwestern agriculture and its congressional supporters who sought to conceive of the Mexican laborer in terms consistent with the eugenic, liberal, and socially conservative sensibilities of the time. What resulted from this strategic creative process was the temporary Mexican, a new breed of peon who had free will and was biologically destined to return to Mexico. This temporariness, which was what made this social construction most palatable in the 1920s, has stayed with Mexicans (and Latinos generally) to the modern day, turning them into an in-between group whose membership is always suspect.

Resumen

Resumen

En base a la literatura sobre el tema de la construcción social de la política pública, este artículo señala la aparición de la imagen del “mexicano temporal” —es decir, el trabajador agrícola migrante— en las audiencias del Congreso referentes a la “Admisión de trabajadores mexicanos analfabetos” de 1920. Mi argumento es que esta construcción fue la gran invención de la agricultura del suroeste y de sus partidarios en el Congreso, que buscaban concebir al trabajador mexicano en términos compatibles con las sensibilidades eugenésicas, liberales y socialmente conservadoras de la época. Lo que resultó de este proceso creativo y estratégico fue “el mexicano temporal”, una nueva clase de peón que tenía libre albedrío y que estaba biológicamente destinado a regresar a México. Esta temporalidad, que fue lo que hizo esta construcción social más aceptable en la década de 1920, ha permanecido con los mexicanos (y latinos en general) en los Estados Unidos hasta la actualidad, convirtiéndolos en un grupo “entre medio”, cuya pertenencia estadounidense está siempre bajo sospecha.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , 2014 , pp. 85 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

I would like to thank Steven Corey, Carolyn Craig, Melinda Kovacs, Dionyssios Mintzopoulos, and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Aguila, Jaime R. 2007 “Mexican/U.S. Immigration Policy prior to the Great Depression.” Diplomatic History 31 (2): 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict (1983) 1991 Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barrera, Mario 1979 Race and Class in the Southwest: A Theory of Racial Inequality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Benton-Cohen, Katherine 2011 “Other Immigrants: Mexicans and the Dillingham Commission of 1907-1911.” Journal of American Ethnic History 30 (2): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Rupert 2000 “Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems, and Future Challenges.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (6): 745–778.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Andorra 2012 Immigration of Temporary Lower-Skilled Workers: Current Policy and Related Issues. CRS Report for Congress R42434, March 20. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Chavez, Leo R. 1994 “The Power of the Imagined Community: The Settlement of Undocumented Mexicans and Central Americans in the United States.” American Anthropologist 96 (1): 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Ann 2010 “Justice Brennan's Footnote Gave Us Anchor Babies.” Townhall.com, August 4. http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2010/08/04/justice_brennans_footnote_gave_us_anchor_babies.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray 1988 Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra, Blanding, David, and Coll, Cynthia García 2011 “The Power of Context: State-Level Policies and Politics and the Educational Performance of the Children of Immigrants in the United States.” Harvard Educational Review 81 (3): 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra, and Junn, Jane 2012 “Aliens and People of Color: The Multidimensional Relationship of Immigration Policy and Racial Classification in the United States.” In The Oxford Handbook on the Politics of International Migration, edited by Rosenblum, Marc R. and Tichenor, Daniel J., 429–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galveston Daily News 1920 “How Wetbacks Are Secured on Border: Witness Tells of Ways Labor is Obtained from Mexico by Texas Landlords.” February 15, 1920.Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Agriculture. 2012 “Report on Agriculture Labor, as Required by House Bill 87.” January 2012. http://www.agr.georgia.gov/AgLaborReport.pdf.Google Scholar
Goethe, C. M. 1929 “The Influx of Mexican Amerinds.” Eugenics 2 (1): 6–9.Google Scholar
Grant, Madison (1916) 1922 The Passing of the Great Race. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, David G. 1995 Walls and Mirrors: Mexican Americans, Mexican Immigrants, and the Politics of Ethnicity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, Kelly Lytle 2010 Migra! A History of the U.S. Border Patrol. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Holding, Reynolds 2011 “‘Anchor Babies’: No Getting Around the Constitution.” Time, February 1. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2045617,00.html.Google Scholar
Hornick, Ed 2011 “Is the Next Immigration Fight Over ‘Anchor Babies‘?” CNN Politics, April 28. http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/28/anchor.baby/.Google Scholar
Jones, Anita Edgar 1928 “Mexican Colonies in Chicago.” Social Service Review 2 (4): 579–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junn, Jane 2007 “From Coolie to Model Minority: U.S. Immigration Policy and the Construction of Racial Identity.” DuBois Review 4 (2): 355–373.Google Scholar
King, Desmond 2002 Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George 1996 Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1994 The American Supreme Court. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Carey 1949 North from Mexico: The Spanish-Speaking People of the United States. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Nobles, Melissa 2000 Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Rumbaut, Rubén G. 2001 Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reisler, Mark 1976 By the Sweat of Their Brow: Mexican Immigrant Labor in the United States, 1900-1940. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Marc Simon 2011 The Tejano Diaspora: Mexican Americanism and Ethnic Politics in Texas and Wisconsin. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Christina D. 1988 “World War I and the Postwar Depression: A Reinterpretation Based on Alternative Estimates of GNP.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1): 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Miguel, Guadalupe Jr. 2000 “Let All of Them Take Heed”: Mexican Americans and the Campaign for Educational Equality in Texas, 1910-1981. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne Larason, and Ingram, Helen 1997 Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne Larason, and Ingram, Helen 2005 (eds.) Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Clare 2002 “Contested Citizenship: National Identity and the Mexican Immigration Debates of the 1920s.” Journal of American Ethnic History 21 (3): 3–35.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997 Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 2011 “Living in a Promiseland?: Mexican Immigration and American Obligations.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (3): 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Alexandra Minna 2005 Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah 2012 The Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1989 Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul S. 1932 Mexican Labor in the United States, Vol. 2, No. 7, Chicago and the Calumet Region. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J. 2002 Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Congress, House 1920 Temporary Admission of Illiterate Mexican Laborers: Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Second Session, on H.J. Res. 271 ... on Jan. 23, 27, 28, 30, and Feb. 2, 1920. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Congress, Senate 1920 Admission of Mexican Agricultural Laborers: Hearing before the Committee on Immigration, United States Senate, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to S.J. Res. 66. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. K. 2002 “Harry Laughlin's Eugenic Crusade to Control the ‘Socially Inadequate’ in Progressive Era America.” Patterns of Prejudice 36 (1): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, Dvora 2003 Constructing “Race” and “Ethnicity” in America: Category-Making in Public Policy and Administration. London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. 2006 A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar