Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T05:29:50.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yucatec Maya Organizations in San Francisco, California: Ethnic Identity Formation across Migrant Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Shannan L. Mattiace  and
Patricia Fortuny Loret de Mola
Shannan L. Mattiace
Affiliation:
Allegheny College
Patricia Fortuny Loret de Mola
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Study and Research in Social Anthropology (CIESAS)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using results of field research among Yucatec Maya in San Francisco, we compare two types of migrant associations: hometown associations (HTAs) and social service agencies, specifically in terms of the use and expression of ethnic identity. We argue that HTA leaders rely on a regional identity based largely on a sense of shared culture, which reproduces the dominant and widespread view of ethnic identity in Yucatán, namely that the Maya are not an indigenous people per se. In contrast, leaders of the social service agencies explicitly utilize indigenous identity in their programming and services. We maintain that the latter are reconceptualizing Maya identity, adopting a US multicultural framework that emphasizes ethnic difference as a basis for making claims for resources and rights.

Resumen

Resumen

Este documento se deriva del trabajo etnográfico realizado entre gente maya yucateca en San Francisco, California. El objetivo central es examinar la transformación de la identidad étnica a través de las generaciones de migrantes. Con este propósito describimos las estrategias de operación de dos tipos de organizaciones de migrantes, las llamadas casas del migrante o hometown associations, que en Yucatán se conocen como federaciones y que incluyen diversos clubes, y dos agencias de servicios sociales. El argumento central sostiene que los líderes de las federaciones exhiben una identidad regional, fundada en un sentido de cultura compartida que tiende a reproducir un punto de vista generalizado sobre la identidad en Yucatán, que afirma que los mayas yucatecos no son indígenas. Los campesinos yucatecos no se han organizado hasta el momento en torno a una identidad indígena y tampoco se auto asignan las categorías de indios, mayas o indígenas. En contraste, los líderes de las organizaciones no gubernamentales, Asociación Mayab e Instituto Familiar de la Raza, utilizan en forma explícita la identidad indígena, tanto en sus programas de atención como en los servicios que ofrecen. Aquí sustentamos que los últimos han reconceptualizado la identidad maya, adoptando un marco que es propio del multiculturalismo norteamericano, en el que se enfatiza la diferencia racial como la base para reclamar recursos y derechos.

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , 2015 , pp. 201 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Tomas Nonnenmacher, Mirian Solís, and Gabriela Vargas for their helpful comments and careful reading of this article. Special thanks also to Quetzil Castañeda for his meticulous reading and to the anonymous LARR reviewers whose constructive suggestions greatly improved the final product. We also thank the many individuals whom we interviewed in San Francisco, both named and unnamed. María Ausencia Estrella provided warm hospitality and conversation in San Francisco. We are especially indebted to Ángel Granados for his generosity and abundant enthusiasm. We thank the A. W. Mellon Foundation for its financial support of our fieldwork.

References

Adler, Rachel H. 2008 Yucatecans in Dallas, Texas: Breaching the Border, Bridging the Distance. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bacab Chulim, Jesús 2012 “Constatan obras del ‘3×1‘: Mejorarán la casa ejidal y harán casetas policiacas.” El Diario de Yucatán, May 4. http://yucatan.com.mx/yucatan/constatan-obras-del-3-por-l.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina 2012 “Collective Remittances and Migrant-State Collaboration in Mexico and El Salvador.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (4): 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Quetzil E. 1996 In the Museum of Maya Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Quetzil E. 2000 “Approaching Ruins: A Photo-Ethnographic Essay on the Busy Intersections of Chichén Itzá. Visual Anthropology Review 16 (2): 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Quetzil E. 2004 “‘We Are Not Indigenous’: An Introduction to the Maya Identity of Yucatán.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology 9 (1): 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Quetzil E. n.d. “Maya or Mayans? Comment on Correct Terminology and Spellings.” The Open School of Ethnography and Anthropology, http://www.osea-cite.org/program/maya_or_mayans.php.Google Scholar
Castillo Cocom, Juan 2005 “It Was Simply Their Word: Yucatec Maya PRInces in YucaPAN and the Politics of Respect.” Critique of Anthropology 25 (2): 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo Cocom, Juan 2007 “Maya Scenarios: Indian Stories In and Out of Contexts.” Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, no. 96:13–35.Google Scholar
Chan Caamal, Joaquín 2013 “Crecen las remesas.” Diario de Yucatán, August 7.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Fitzgerald, David, and Lewin-Fischer, Pedro, eds. 2007 Mayan Journeys: The New Migration from Yucatán to the United States. Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla.Google Scholar
Crow, Joanna 2010 “Introduction: Intellectuals, Indigenous Ethnicity and the State in Latin America.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies (LACES) 5 (2): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Garza, Rodolfo O., and Hazán, Miryam 2003 “Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Mexican Organizations in the U.S. as Agents of Incorporation and Dissociation.” Working paper #6023, Tomás Rivera Policy Institute, University of Southern California. http://www.trpi.org.Google Scholar
DeSipio, Louis 2011 “Immigrant Incorporation in an Era of Weak Civic Institutions: Immigrant Civic and Political Participation in the United States.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (9): 1189–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Bada, Xochitl 2008 “Migrant Organization and Hometown Impacts in Rural Mexico.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2-3): 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbert, Wolfgang 2004 Becoming Maya: Ethnicity and Social Inequality in Yucatán since 1500. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Goldring, Luin 2003 “Gender, Status, and the State in Transnational Spaces: The Gendering of Political Participation in Mexican Home Town Associations.” In Gender and US Immigration: Contemporary Trends, edited by Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette, 341–358. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hervik, Peter 2003 Mayan People within and beyond Boundaries: Social Categories and Lived Identity in Yucatán. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática) 2005 Perfil sociodemográfico de la población hablante de maya: XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000. Mexico City: INEGI.Google Scholar
INI (Instituto Nacional Indigenista), Sistema de Información Geográfica 2002 Indicadores socioeconómicos de los pueblos indígenas de México 2002. Elaborado por el Sistema de Información Geográfica, Verónica Gámez Montes, José Alberto Salas Serrato. Mexico City: INI, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, Consejo Nacional de Población.Google Scholar
Kearney, Michael 1994 “Desde el indigenismo a los derechos humanos: Etnicidad y política más allá de la mixteca.” Nueva Antropología 14 (46): 49–67.Google Scholar
Mattiace, Shannan 2009 “Ethnic Mobilization among the Maya of Yucatán.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 4 (2): 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagengast, Carole, and Kearney, Michael 1990 “Mixtec Ethnicity: Social Identity, Political Consciousness, and Political Activism. Latin American Research Review 25 (2): 61–91.Google Scholar
Pérez Rendón, Alberto 2007 “Reflections on Mayab Bejlae.” Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, no. 96:83–85.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, Escobar, Cristina, and Arana, Renelinda 2008 “Bridging the Gap: Transnational and Ethnic Organizations in the Political Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (6): 1056–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Rumbaut, Rubén 2006 Immigrant America: A Portrait. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restall, Matthew 2004 “Maya Ethnogenesis.” Journal of Latin American Anthropology 9 (1): 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solís Lizama, Mirian, and Patricia Fortuny Loret de, Mola 2010 “Otomíes hidalguenses y mayas yucatecos: Nuevas caras de la migración indígena y viejas formas de organización.” Migraciones Internacionales 5 (4): 101–138.Google Scholar
Stephen, Lynn 2007 Transborder Lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California, and Oregon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, Steven J. 2003 Children of the New Age: A History of Spiritual Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Velasco Ortiz, Laura 2005 Mixtec Transnational Identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Vila Freyer, Ana 2007 “Las políticas de atención a migrantes en los estados de México: Acción, reacción y gestión.” In ¿Invisibles? Migrantes internacionales en la escena política, edited by Bayona, Cecilia Imaz, 77–105. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Yrizar Barbosa, Guillermo, and Alarcón, Rafael 2010 “Emigration Policy and State Governments in Mexico.” Migraciones Internacionales 5 (4): 165–198.Google Scholar