Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T12:21:19.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not: A Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

The author explains the origins of All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law (2010) as a response to a fundamental question posed by legal realism: How can the judicial process be permeated with politics and yet remain an accepted part of a legitimate legal system? The author demonstrates the ongoing importance of this question by examining debates over the place of constitutional law in the law school curriculum and by assessing public perceptions of the Supreme Court's ruling on health care reform. The author then addresses the critical appraisals presented by the symposium contributors. The critiques are taken as road maps for extending the author's arguments in new directions.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks the symposium contributors for their thoughtful responses. He also thanks participants in the author-meets-readers roundtables at the New England Political Science Association and the Law & Society Association annual meetings for their valuable comments.

References

References

Barnes, Robert, and Clement, Scott. 2012. Poll: More Americans Expect Supreme Court's Health‐Care Decision to be Political. Washington Post, April 11. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll‐half‐of‐americans‐expect‐supreme‐courts‐health‐care‐decision‐to‐be‐political/2012/04/10/gIQAOoqW9S_story.html (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Braman, Eileen. 2009. Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Susan R. 2008. The Founding Fathers, Pop Culture, and Constitutional Law: Who's Your Daddy? Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2010. All Judges Are Political—Except When They Are Not: Acceptable Hypocrisies and the Rule of Law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2011. “The Rule of Law is Dead! Long Live the Rule of Law!” In What's Law Got to Do with It? What Judges Do, Why They Do it, and What's at Stake, ed. Geyh, Charles Gardner. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Lief H., and Burke, Thomas F. 2007. Reason in Law, updated 7th ed. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stephen M. 2000. American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism: An Intellectual Voyage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III. 1991. The Development of Modern American Legal Theory and the Judicial Interpretation of the Bill of Rights. In A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics, and Law, 1791 and 1991, ed. Lacey, Michael J. and Haakonssen, Knud. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox News. 2012. Survey, April 9–April 11, 2012. Conducted by Anderson Robbins Research/Shaw & Co. Research. Data provided by iPoll Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/ipoll/ipoll.html#.T_8QqXD8HRA (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2011. The Supreme Court 2010 Term—Foreword: Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 125:177.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2012a. Topline—Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: March 2012. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8285‐T.pdf (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2012b. Topline—Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: April 2012. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8302‐T.pdf (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2012c. Topline—Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: Early Reaction to Supreme Court Decision on the ACA, June 2012. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8329‐T.pdf (accessed July 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1986. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Ezra. 2012. Of Course the Supreme Court is Political. Wonkblog, June 21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra‐klein/wp/2012/06/21/of‐course‐the‐supreme‐court‐is‐political/ (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2012. Not Contrarian Enough: A Response to Michael Stokes Paulsen's Critique of Contemporary Courses on Constitutional Law. Liberty Forum, January 31. http://libertylawsite.org/liberty‐forum/not‐contrarian‐enough‐a‐response‐to‐michael‐stokes‐paulsens‐critique‐of‐contemporary‐courses‐on‐constitutional‐law/ (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam, and Kopicki, Allison. 2012a. Approval Rating for Justices Hits Just 44% in New Poll. New York Times, June 7. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/08/us/politics/44‐percent‐of‐americans‐approve‐of‐supreme‐court‐in‐new‐poll.html?pagewanted=all (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam, and Kopicki, Allison. 2012b. Public's Opinion of Supreme Court Drops after Health Care Law Decision. New York Times, July 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/us/politics/publics‐opinion‐of‐court‐drops‐after‐health‐care‐law‐decision.html?hpw (accessed July 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Lund, Nelson. 2012. The Usefulness of Constitutional Law. Liberty Forum, January 31. http://libertylawsite.org/liberty‐forum/the‐usefulness‐of‐constitutional‐law/ (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
New York Times/CBS News. 2012a. Poll, May 31–June 3, 2012. New York Times, June 7. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/06/08/us/politics/08scotus‐poll‐documents.html?ref=politics (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
New York Times/CBS News. 2012b. Poll, July 11–16, 2012. New York Times, July 18. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/07/19/us/nytcbspoll‐results.html?ref=politics (accessed July 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 2012. The Uselessness of Constitutional Law. Liberty Forum, January 31. http://libertylawsite.org/liberty‐forum/the‐uselessness‐of‐constitutional‐law/ (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2012. Supreme Court Favorability Reaches New Low. Pew Research Center for People & the Press, May 1. http://www.people‐press.org/2012/05/01/supreme‐court‐favorability‐reaches‐new‐low/?src=prc‐headline (accessed July 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward A., Jr. 1973. The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schelegel, John Henry. 1995. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 566 (2012).Google Scholar