Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:17:41.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clearing the Underbrush for Real-Life Contracting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Section Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braucher, Jean. 1990. Contract Versus Contractarianism: The Regulatory Role of Contract Law. Washington and Lee Law Review 47:697739.Google Scholar
Braucher, Jean. 1995. The Afterlife of Contract. Northwestern Law Review 90:4988.Google Scholar
Budnitz, Mark E. 1992. The Revision of U.C.C. Articles Three and Four: A Process Which Excluded Consumer Protection Requires Federal Action. Mercer Law Review 43:827–51.Google Scholar
Calamari, John D., and Perillo, Joseph M. 1967. A Plea for a Uniform Parol Evidence Rule and Principles of Contract Interpretation. Indiana Law Journal 42:333–54.Google Scholar
Casner, James A., ed. 1952. American Law of Property. Vol. 1. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Chafee, Zechariah. 1930. The Internal Affairs of Associations Not for Profit. 43 Harvard Law Review 43:9931029.Google Scholar
Cooper, Corinne. 1993. The Madonnas Play Tug of War with the Whores or Who Is Saving the UCC Loyola. of Los Angeles Law Review 26:563–77.Google Scholar
Corbin, Arthur L. 1944. The Parol Evidence Rule. Yale Law Journal 53:603–63.Google Scholar
Danzig, Richard. 1974. The Capability Problem in Contract Law. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. 1992. The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession Michigan Law Review 91:3440.Google Scholar
Feinman, Jay. Promissory Estoppel and Judicial Method. Harvard Law Review 97:678700.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha. 1988. Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decision Making. Harvard Law Review 101:727–74.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95160.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Cahill, Mia. 1994. “Most Cases Settle”: Judicial Promotion and Regulation of Settlements. Stanford Law Review 46:1339–91.Google Scholar
Gilmore, . 1974. The Death of Contract. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, Charles, and Scott, Robert. 1977. Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach. Columbia Law Review 77:554–94.Google Scholar
Goetz, Charles, and Scott, Robert. 1979. Measuring Sellers' Damages: The Lost-Profits Puzzle. Stanford Law Review 31:323–73.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1985. Macaulay, Macneil, and the Discovery of Solidarity and Power in Contract Law. Wisconsin Law Review 1985:565–79.Google Scholar
Grillo, Trina. 1991. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. 100 Yale Law Journal 100:15451610.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, Gail. Symposium, The Redrafting of UCC Articles 2 and 9: Model Codes or Model Dinosaurs Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 28:191217.Google Scholar
Holden, Mary Wisniewski. 1997. As Courts Overflow, Mediation Flourishes. Chicago Lawyer, March.Google Scholar
Janger, Edward J. 1997. Predicting When the Uniform Law Process Will Fail: Article 9, Capture, and the Race to the Bottom. Iowa Law Review 83:569632.Google Scholar
Janoff, Sandra. 1991. The Influence of Legal Education on Moral Reasoning. Minnesota Law Review 76:193236.Google Scholar
Keeton, Robert E. 1971. Insurance Law: Basic Text. St. Paul, Minn.: West.Google Scholar
Keeton, Page W., Dan Dobbs, B., Keeton, Robert E., Owen, David G. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on Torts. 5th ed. St. Paul, Minn:West.Google Scholar
Kessler, Frederich. 1943. Contracts of Adhesion-Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract. Columbia Law Review 43:629–42.Google Scholar
King, Donald B. 1992. Major Problems With Article 2A: Unfairness, “Cutting Off” Consumer Defenses, Unfiled Interests, and Uneven Adoption. Mercer Law Review 43:869–85.Google Scholar
Kuzuhara, Kizuki. 1996. Contracting Between a Japanese Enterprise and an American Enterprise: The Differences in the Importance of Written Documents as the Final Agreement in the United States and Japan. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 3:5791.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur. 1969. Unconscionability and the Crowd-Consumers and the Common Law Tradition. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 31:349–58.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur. 1979. Thomist Unconscionability. Canadin Business Law Journal 4:424–28.Google Scholar
Linzer, Peter. 1981. On the Amorality of Contract Remedies-Efficiency, Equity, and the Second Restatement. Columbia Law Review 81:111–39.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1939a. Across Sales on Horseback. Harvard Law Review 52:725–46.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1939b. Book Review of O. Prausnitz, The Standardization of Commercial Contracts in English and Continental Law . Harvard Law Review 52:700705.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian. 1974. The Many Futures of Contracts. Southern California Law Review 47:691–98.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian. 1977. Contracts: Exchange Transactions and Relations. 2d ed. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian. 1984. Bureaucracy and Contracts of Adhesion. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22:528.Google Scholar
Mann, Ronald. 1996. Explaining the Pattern of Secured Credit. Harvard Law Review 110:625–83.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin, and Behraveth, Nariman. 1986. Economics USA, 3145. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1991. Symposium: Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or “The Law of ADR. Florida State University Law Review 19:146.Google Scholar
Meyerson, M. 1993. The Reunification of Contract Law: The Objective Theory of Consumer Form Contracts. University of Miami Law Review 47:1263–333.Google Scholar
Miller, Fred H. 1994. Symposium: The Revision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Consumer Issues and the Revision of U.CC. Article 2. William and Mary Law Review 35:1565–91.Google Scholar
Mooney, Ralph James. 1995. The New Conceptualism in Contract Law. Oregon Law Review 74:11311207.Google Scholar
Patterson, Edwin W. 1919. The Delivery of a Life-Insurance Policy. Harvard Law Review 33:198222.Google Scholar
Palay, Thomas. 1986. Relational Contracting, Transaction Cost Economics and the Governance of HMOs. Temple Law Quarterly 59:927950.Google Scholar
Perlman, Harvey S. 1982. Interference with Contract and Other Economic Expectancies: A Clash of Tort and Contract Doctrine. University of Chicago Law Review 49:61129.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1992. Economic Analysis of the Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ribstein, Larry E. 1993. Choosing Law by Contract. Journal of Corporate Law 18:245300.Google Scholar
Rosmarin, Yvonne W. 1994. Symposium: The Revision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, Consumers-R-Us: A Reality in the U.C.C. Article 2 Revision Process. William and Mary Law Review 35:15931633.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan. 1990. The Myth that Promisees Prefer Supracompensatory Remedies: An Analysis. Yale Law Journal 100:369407.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Scott, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Private Legislatures. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:595654.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Wilde, Louis L. 1979. Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127:630–82.Google Scholar
Schwartz, David S. 1997. Enforcing Small Print to Protect Big Business: Employee and Consumer Rights Claims in an Age of Compelled Arbitration. Wisconsin Law Review 1997:33132.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 1994. The Politics of Article 9. Virginia Law Review 80:17831851.Google Scholar
Speidel, Richard. 1996. Securities Arbitration: a Decade After Mcmahon: Contract Theory And Securities Arbitration: Whither Consent Brooklyn Law Review 62:1335–80.Google Scholar
Twain, Mark. [1884]1981. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Reprint. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
U.S. Law Week. 1997. Elimination of Mandatory Arbitration Claims Proposed by NASD. 66 (19 August): 2105–6.Google Scholar
Von Mehren, Arthur Taylor, and Russell Gordley, James. 1977. The civil Law System. An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Warren, Elizabeth. 1987. Bankruptcy Policy. University of Chicago Law Review 54:775814.Google Scholar
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1996. Contractarians, Community, and the Tort of Interference with Contract. Minnesota Law Review 80:1103–82.Google Scholar
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997a. Contracts for Grown-ups. Journal of Legal Education 47:139–48.Google Scholar
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997b. The Realist and Secured Credit: Grant Gilmore, Common Law Courts, and the Article 9 Reform Process. Cornell Law Review 82:1511–31.Google Scholar
Woodward, William J. Jr. 1997c. “Sale” of Law and Forum and the Widening Gulf Between “Consumer” and “Nonconsumer” Contracts in the UCC. Washington University Law Quarterly 75:243–87.Google Scholar