Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:34:22.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment—Power Is as Power Does

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

John M. Conley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 2006 , pp. 467 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. Conservative Conflict and the Reproduction of Capitalism: The Role of Informal Justice. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 9:245–67.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2002. The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English Speaking Murder Suspect. In Language in the Legal Process, ed. Cotterill, Janet. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan, and Trinch, Shonna L. 2002. Narrating in Protective Order Interviews: A Source of Interactional Trouble. Language in Society 31(3):383–41.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles L., and Martini-Briggs, Clara. 2003. Stories in theTime of Cholera: Racial Profiling During a Medical Nightmare. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bucholz, Mary. 1994. Review of Reproducing Rape: Domination Through Talk in the Courtroom, by Matoesian, Gregory M. American Anthropologist 96:1004–05.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Clare. Deconstructing Contract Doctrine. Yale Law Journal 94:997–1114.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela. 1991. Dispute Resolution Without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument. American Sociological Review 56:818–35.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David, and Dingwall, Robert. 1989. Selective Facilitation: Some Preliminary Observations on a Strategy Used by Divorce Mediators. Law & Society Review 23:613–41.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2003. Ideologies of Language: Some Reflections on Language and U.S. Law. American Anthropologist 105(4):764–74.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F. 1998. Pronouncing & Persevering: Gender and the Discourses of Disputing in an African Islamic court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1989. When Talk Isn't Cheap: Language and Political Economy. American Ethnologist 16:248–67.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 2005. What Is Wanted from Ethnographic Fieldwork Today? Anthropology News 46(6):9–12.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing Rape: Domination Through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Setting. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1986. Everyday Understanding of the Law in Working-Class America. American Ethnologist 13:253–70.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. Forthcoming. Law School Language: Learning to “Think” Like a Lawyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. 1998. Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy E. 1994. Review of Reproducing Rape: Domination Through Talk in the Courtroom, by Matoesian, Gregory M. Journal of Legal Education 44:462–66.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travers, Max. 2006. Understanding Talk in Legal Settings: What Law and Society Studies Can Learn from a Conversation Analyst. Law and Social Inquiry 31(2):445–63.Google Scholar
Trinch, Shonna L. 2003. Latinas’ Narratives of Domestic Abuse: Discrepant Versions of Violence. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar