Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:14:06.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse Dilemmas and Courtroom Control: The Talk of Trial Judges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Bryna Bogoch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , Winter 2000 , pp. 227 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1982. Understanding Formality: The Categorization and Production of “Formal” Interaction. British Journal of Sociology 33:86–117.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Drew, Paul. 1979. Order in Court. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna. 1994. Power, Distance, and Solidarity: Models of Professional-Client Interaction in an Israeli Legal Aid Setting. Discourse and Society 5(1):65–88.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridicial Field. Hastings Law Journal 38:805–53. Translated with introduction by Richard Terdiman.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Ford, Marguerite. 1964. Address in American English. In Language in Culture and Society, ed. Hymes, D., pp. 234–43. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bulow-Moiler, Anne Marie. 1991. Trial Evidence: Overt and Covert Communication in Court. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:(1)38–60.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Harvey, Penelope, Rampton, M. B. H., and Richardson, Kay. 1992. Introduction. In Researching language: Issues of Power and Method, ed. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., and Richardson, K., pp. 1–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sarah. 1997. The Domestication of Violence in Mediation. Law and Society Review 31:397–440.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1990. Language and the Law: An Overview of 15 Years of Research. In Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, ed. Giles, Howard and Peter Robinson, W., pp. 537–60. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda, and Bogoch, Bryna. 1980. “Fixed Fight or Free-for-All”? An Empirical Study of Combativeness in the Adversary System of Justice. British Journal of Law and Society 7:36–60.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert, and Greathatch, David. 1994. Divorce Mediation: The Virtues of Formality. In A Reader in Family Law, ed. Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M., pp. 391–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert, and Strong, P. M. 1985. The Interactional Study of Organizations. Urban Life 14:205–31.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1990. Strategies in the Contest between Lawyer and Witness in Cross-Examination. In Language in the Judicial Process, ed. Judith Levi, N. and Ann Walker, G., pp. 39–64. N.Y.: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Sheila. 1996. The Mirror Tells Its Tale: Constructions of Gender in Criminal Law. In Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, ed. Bottom-ley, Anne, pp. 173–89. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David, and Dingwall, Robert. 1999. Professional Neutralism in Family Mediation. In Talk, Work and Institutional order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C., pp. 271–292. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1994. Ideological Exchanges in British Magistrates Courts. In Language and the Law, ed. Gibbons, John, pp. 156–70. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F. 1992. Language, Gender, and Linguistic Ideologies in Coastal Kenyan Muslim Courts. Working Papers on Language, Gender, and Sexism 2(1):39–58.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Sally. 1985. Law as Discourse. History and Anthropology 1:241–64.Google Scholar
Jackson, Bernard S. 1995. Making Sense in Law: Linguistic, Psychological, and Semiotic Perspectives. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.Google Scholar
Lipman-Blumen, Jean. 1994. The Existential Bases of Power Relationships: The Gender Role Case. In Powersol;Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice, ed. Lorraine Radtke, H. and Henderikus Stam, J., pp. 108–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Court-room. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. 1997. “You were Interested in Him as a Person?” Rhythms of Domination in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Law and Social Inquiry 22:55–91.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1984. Inside Plea Bargaining. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1992. Language, Law, and Social Meanings: Linguistic-Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Law. Law and Society Review 26:413–45.Google Scholar
Nelken, David, ed. 1996. Law as Communication. Aldershot, U.K: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Penman, R. 1987a. Discourse in Courts: Cooperation, Coercion, and Coherence. Discourse Processes 10:201–18.Google Scholar
Penman, Robyn. 1987b. Regulation of Discourse in the Adversary Trial. Windsor Year-book of Access to Justice 7:3–20.Google Scholar
Penman, Robyn 1991. Goals, Games, and Moral Orders: A Paradoxical Case in Court? In Understanding Face-to-Face Interaction: Issues Linking Goals and Discourse, ed. Tracy, Karen, pp. 21–42. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. 1985. Strategies of Clarification in Judges' Use of Language: From Written to the Spoken. Discourse Processes 8:421–36.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas Keams, R. 1996. Editorial Introduction. In The Rhetoric of Law, ed. Sarat, Austin and Thomas Keams, R., pp. 1–27. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1992. Litigation as Consummatory Action: The Instrumental Paradigm Reconsidered. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 11:41–68.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger. 1995. How a Judge's Voire Dire can Teach a Jury What to Say. Discourse and Society 6(2):207–22.Google Scholar
Travers, Max. 1997. The Reality of Law: Work and Talk in a Firm of Criminal Lawyers. Aldershot, U.K: Ashgate.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1985. Hercules' Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of Law. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar