Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:23:15.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Public Sociology to Public Philosophy: Lessons for Law and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Paul van Seters
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late Philip Selznick's final book, A Humanist Science, examines the role of values and ideals in the social sciences, including the study of law and society. Throughout his academic career, Selznick was committed to what he called “legal naturalism,” a sociological version of the natural‐law perspective, while his critics continue to adhere to various forms of positivism. But the age‐old opposition between natural law and legal positivism today may be giving way to the quest for public sociology—a sociology that promotes public reflection on significant social issues and thus functions as a moral and political force. A Humanist Science ends with a strong plea for public philosophy. Public philosophy overlaps with public sociology but is a much stronger concept. Selznick's message of public philosophy may be another of his enduring contributions to the field of law and society.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Fall 2010 , pp. 1137 - 1154
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrams, Philip. 1985. The Uses of British Sociology 1831–1981. In Essays on the History of British Sociological Research, ed. Bulmer, Martin, 181–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1972a. The Boundaries of Legal Sociology. Yale Law Journal 81 (6): 1086–100.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1972b. Review of Law, Society, and Industrial Justice, by Philip Selznick. American Journal of Sociology 78 (3): 709–14.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1973. The Mobilization of Law. Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1): 125–49.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald J. 1989. Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Judith, and Iyall Smith, Keri E., eds. 2006. Public Sociologies Reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 2002. Sociology That Really Matters. European Sociological Review 18 (3): 371–78.Google Scholar
Broom, Leonard, and Selznick, Philip. 1955. Sociology: A Text with Adapted Readings. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 2005. For Public Sociology: 2004 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review 70 (1): 4–28. http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS.Webpage/ps.mainpage.htm (accessed April 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. 2001. Berkeley Sociology: Past, Present and Future. Unpublished manuscript. http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS/Berkeley%20Sociology.pdf (accessed April 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan, Zussman, Robert, Misra, Joya, Gerstel, Naomi, Stokes, Randall, Anderson, Douglas L., and Burawoy, Michael, eds. 2007. Public Sociology: Fifteen Eminent Sociologists Debate Politics and the Profession in the Twenty‐First Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2004. Selznick Interviewed: Philip Selznick in Conversation with Roger Cotterrell. Journal of Law and Society 31 (4): 291–317.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2008. Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1968. Anatomy of the Law. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Vincent. 2009. The Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. Forthcoming. Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962 1911. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Dan, ed. 2007. Public Sociology: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1952. The Irony of American History. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1952. The Organizational Weapon: A Study of Bolshevik Strategy and Tactics. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1959. The Sociology of Law. In Sociology Today: Problems and Prospects, ed. Merton, Robert K., Broom, Leonard, and Cottrell, Leonard S. Jr., 115–27. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1961. Sociology and Natural Law. Natural Law Forum 6: 84–108.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1967. Sociology of Law. In vol. 7 of The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edwards, Paul, 478–80. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1968. The Sociology of Law. In vol. 9 of International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David L., 50–59. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1969. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. With Philippe Nonet and Howard M. Vollmer. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1970. Review of Anatomy of the Law, by Lon L. Fuller. Harvard Law Review 83 (6): 1474–80.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1973. Rejoinder to Donald J. Black. American Journal of Sociology 78 (5): 1266–69.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1976. The Ethos of American Law. In The Americans, 1976: An Inquiry into Fundamental Concepts of Man Underlying Various US Institutions, ed. Kristol, Irving and Weaver, Paul, 211–36. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1980. Jurisprudence and Social Policy: Aspirations and Perspectives. California Law Review 68 (2): 206–20.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1989. Dworkin's Unfinished Task. California Law Review 77 (3): 505–13.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1992. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1999. A Case for Legal Naturalism: “Sociology and Natural Law” Revisited. A lecture delivered at the annual meeting of the Research Committee on Sociology of Law, International Sociological Association, July 9, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 2002. The Communitarian Persuasion. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 2008. A Humanist Science: Values and Ideals in Social Inquiry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne. 2003. The Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S., ed. 1999. Max Weber: Critical Responses. 3 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, ed. Shils, E. A. and Finch, H. A. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar