Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T10:02:42.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Anna-Maria Marshall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the frames that women use to understand their experience with sexual harassment. While legal frames do provide crucial guidance to women evaluating the behavior of their colleagues and supervisors, working women deployed a number of other interpretive frames when deciding whether they had been harmed by such behavior. Some of those frames emerge from feminist messages about discrimination and male abuse of power in the workplace; some emerge from management ideology that emphasizes efficiency and productivity; and some emerge from the criticism of sexual harassment policies as an unnecessary limitation on women's sexual freedom. But feeling a sense of harm does not automatically translate into the use of the label sexual harassment. Rather, women also employed an objective standard that compared their experience to some threshold of harassing behaviors. Only when the behaviors met this standard of offensiveness and were perceived as harmful did women consider their experiences sexual harassment.

Type
Symposium in their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 659 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Kathryn. 1989. Gender Discrimination and the Transformation of Workplace Norms. Vanderbilt Law Review 42: 1183–248.Google Scholar
Abrams, Kathryn. 1998. The New Jurisprudence of Sexual Harassment. Cornell Law Review 83: 1169–230.Google Scholar
Arvey, Richard D., and Marcie, A. Cavanaugh. 1995. Using Surveys to Assess the Prevalence of Sexual Harassment: Some Methodological Problems. Journal of Social Issues 51: 39–52.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Anita. 1994. Law, Culture, and Harassment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 1227–311.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Anita. 1997. Treating Sexual Harassment With Respect. Harvard Law Review 97: 2153–176.Google Scholar
Belton, Robert. 1978. A Comparative Review of Public and Private Enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vanderbilt Law Review 31: 905–61.Google Scholar
Buechler, Steven M. 1995. New Social Movement Theories. Sociological Quarterly 36: 441–64.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography, and Sexual Harassment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Howard, S. Erlanger, and John, John. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law and Society Review 27: 497–534.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Christopher, Christopher, and Howard, S. Erlanger. 1999. The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology 105: 406–54.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1991. Sex at Work. Stanford Law Review 43: 813–61.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F. 1974. Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing. Law and Society Review 9: 63–94.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Richard, L. Abel, Austin Sarat. 1980–81. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law and Society Review 15: 631–54.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Suzanne, Suzanne, and Vicki, Vicki. 1997. But Was It Really Sexual Harassment? Legal, Behavioral, and Psychological Definitions of the Workplace Victimization of Women. In Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment, ed. William, O'Donohue. New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine. 1997. What's Wrong with Sexual Harassment Stanford Law Review 49: 691–772.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1995. Constructing Social Protest. In Social Movements and Culture, ed. Hank, Johnston and Bert, Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Giuffre, Patricia A., and Christine, L. Williams. 1994. Boundary Lines: Labeling Sexual Harassment in Restaurants. Gender and Society 8: 378–401.Google Scholar
Johnston, Hank, Enrique, Larana, and Joseph, R. Gusfield. 1994. Identities, Grievances, and New Social Movements. In New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, ed. Enrique, Larana, Hank, Johnston, and Joseph, R. Gusfield. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary F. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and the Military. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kihnley, Jennie. 2000. Unraveling the Ivory Fabric: Institutional Obstacles to the Handling of Sexual Harassment Complaints. Law & Social Inquiry 25: 69–90.Google Scholar
Levine, Kay, and Virginia, Virginia. 2001. Strategizing the Street: How Law Matters in the Lives of Women in the Street-Level Drug Economy. Law & Social Inquiry 26: 169–207.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1979. The Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 1998. Closing the Gaps: Plaintiffs in Pivotal Sexual Harassment Cases. Law & Social Inquiry 23: 761–93.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2001. A Spectrum in Oppositional Consciousness: Sexual Harassment Plaintiffs and Their Lawyers. In Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest, ed. Jane, J. Mansbridge and Aldon, Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, and Barbara, Barbara. 1980-n81. Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes. Law and Society Review 15: 775–822.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1998. How Does Law Matter for Social Movements? In How Does Law Matter? ed. Bryant, G. Garth and Austin, Sarat. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Merit Systems Protection Board. 1995. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Trends, Progress, and Continuing Challenges. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Phoebe A. 1999. Risking Relationships: Understanding the Litigation Choices of Sexually Harassed Women. Law and Society Review 33: 67–93.Google Scholar
Morris, Aldon D. 1992. Political Consciousness and Collective Action. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon, D. Morris and Carol, McClurg Mueller. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review 34: 1055–90.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard, Richard. 1977. Poor People's Movements. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2000. The Structural Context of Novel Rights Claims: Southern Civil Rights Organizing, 1961–1966. Law and Society Review 34: 367–406.Google Scholar
Quinn, Beth A. 2000. The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor and Harassment in the Everyday Work World. Law & Social Inquiry 25: 1151–85.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. 2000a. Employment Discrimination or Sexual Violence? Defining Sexual Harassment in American and French Law. Law and Society Review 34: 1091–128.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. 2000b. Sexual Harassment in France and the United States: Activists and Public Figures Defend Their Definitions. In Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, ed. Lamont, M. and Thevenot, L. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas, R. Kearns. 1995. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Austin, Sarat and Thomas, R. Kearns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 1998. Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment. Yale Law Journal 107: 1732–805.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki. 2001. Talking about Harassment. Journal of Law and Policy 9: 417–33.Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll, and Frank, Frank. 1996. Law and Inequality: Race, Gender… and of Course, Class. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 187–212.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 1996. Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Robert, D. Benford. 1992. Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon, D. Morris and Carol, McClurg Mueller. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Doug, McAdam. 2000. Identity Work Processes in the Context of Social Movements: Clarifying the Identity/Movement Nexus. In Self, Identity, and Social Movements, ed. Sheldon, Stryker, Timothy, J. Owens, and Robert, W. White. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke Jr., Steven, K. Worden, and Robert, Robert. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51: 464–81.Google Scholar
Stockdale, Margaret S., Vaux, A., and Cashin, J. 1995. Acknowledging Sexual Harassment: A Test of Alternative Models. Basic Applied Social Psychology 17: 469–96.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta, and Nancy, E. Whittier. 1992. Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon, D. Morris and Carol, McClurg Mueller. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta, and Nancy, E. Whittier. 1995. Analytical Approaches to Social Movement Culture: The Culture of the Women's Movement. In Social Movements and Culture, ed. Hank, Johnston and Bert, Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1997. What Speech Does “Hostile Work Environment Harassment” Law Restrict Georgetown Law Review 85: 627–648.Google Scholar
Weeks, Elaine Lunsford, Jacqueline, M. Boles, Albeno, P. Garbin, and John, John. 1986. The Transformation of Sexual Harassment from a Private Trouble into a Public Issue. Sociological Inquiry 56: 432–55.Google Scholar
Welsh, Sandy. 1999. Gender and Sexual Harassment. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 169–90.Google Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 1995. Feminist Generations: The Persistence of the Radical Women's Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine. 1997. Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Critique of Current Research and Policy. Sexuality and Culture 1: 19–43.Google Scholar
Yount, K. 1991. Ladies, Flirts, and Tomboys: Strategies for Managing Sexual Harassment in an Underground Coal Mine. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 19: 396–422.Google Scholar