Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Diesfeld, Kate
and
Mckenna, Brian
2006.
The Therapeutic Intent of the New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal.
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
100.
Wilson, John
and
Stapleton, Karyn
2007.
Handbook of Pragmatics.
p.
1.
Diesfeld, Kate
and
Sjöström, Stefan
2007.
Interpretive flexibility: why doesn't insight incite controversy in mental health law?.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
85.
Dingwall, Robert
2007.
The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.
Saetta, Sébastien
Sicot, François
and
Renard, Tristan
2011.
Les usages des expertises psy au procès d'assises et les définitions pratiques de la responsabilité.
Déviance et Société,
Vol. Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
647.
Matoesian, Gregory
2012.
The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.
Kojder, Andrzej
and
Cywiński, Zbigniew
2014.
Socjologia prawa. Główne problemy i postacie.
van Oorschot, Irene
2014.
Seeing the Case Clearly: File‐Work, Material Mediation, and Visualizing Practices in a Dutch Criminal Court.
Symbolic Interaction,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
439.
van Oorschot, Irene
Mascini, Peter
and
Weenink, Don
2017.
Remorse in Context(s).
Social & Legal Studies,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
359.
Moore, Jennifer S.
Forster, Christine
Diesfeld, Kate
and
Rychert, Marta
2019.
New Zealand lawyers and conveyancers disciplinary tribunal cases involving vulnerable clients, 2011–2017.
International Journal of the Legal Profession,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
265.
D’hondt, Sigurd
2022.
Analyzing equivalences in discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA),
p.
421.