Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:59:43.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning to Dispute: Repeat Participation, Expertise, and Reputation at the World Trade Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Joseph A. Conti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This mixed‐method analysis examines the effects of repeat participation on disputing at the World Trade Organization (WTO). Differences between disputants in terms of their experience with WTO disputing processes affect the likelihood of a dispute transitioning to a panel review in distinct ways, depending upon the configuration of the parties. More experienced complainants tend to achieve settlements, while more experienced respondents tend to refuse conciliation. Strategies of experienced respondents are derived from the expertise generated from repeated direct participation and the normalcy of disputing for repeat players as well as the benefits accruing from a reputation for being unlikely to settle. Repeat players also seek to avoid disputes expected to produce unfavorable jurisprudence but do not actively try to create new case law through the selection of disputes. This research demonstrates a dynamic learning process in how parties use international legal forums and thus extends sociolegal scholarship beyond the nation‐state.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , Summer 2010 , pp. 625 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. Why States Act through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 3–32.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3): 421–56.Google Scholar
ACWL. 2008. Report on Operations 2008. Geneva. Advisory Center on WTO Law.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine. 1999. The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning. Law & Society Review 33 (4): 869–910.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul David. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2003. Resolving or Exacerbating Disputes? The WTO's New Dispute Resolution System. International Affairs 79 (4): 783–800.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni, and Drangel, J. 1986. The Stratification of the World‐Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone. Review 10 (1): 9–74.Google Scholar
Babones, Salvatore J. 2005. The Country‐Level Income Structure of the World‐Economy. Journal of World System Research 11 (1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Boswell, Terry, and Chase‐Dunn, Christopher K. 2000. The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2005. Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties, and Free Riders. World Bank Economic Review 19 (2): 287–310.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2002. Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement. In The Political Economic of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, ed. Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James E., 457–81. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement. Journal of World Trade 37 (4): 719–35.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. Three's a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement. World Politics 58 (3): 446.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric, and Shaffer, Gregory C. 2009. Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members. World Trade Review 8 (4): 559–77.Google Scholar
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher K. 1989. Global Formation: Structures of the World‐Economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon. 2008. A WTO Panel Openly Rejects the Appellate Body's “Zeroing” Case Law. ASIL Insight 14 (2). http://www.asil.org/insights080311.cfm (accessed April 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario, Gould, William W., and Gutierrez, Roberto. 2004. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. 2008. The Good Case: Decisions to Litigate at the World Trade Organization. Law & Society Review 42 (1): 145–82.Google Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. 2010. Producing Legitimacy at the World Trade Organization: The Role of Expertise and Legal Capacity. Socio-Economic Review 8 (1): 131–55.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L., and Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2009. Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication. Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1033–49.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1999. The Two Motifs of “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead” and Its Heirs. Law & Society Review 33 (4): 1089–98.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Huber, Evelyne, eds. 1985. States versus Markets in the World‐System. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Government of Switzerland. 2007. List of the Foreign States in Switzerland. http://www.eda.admin.ch/etc/medialib/downloads/edazen/topics/intorg/un/gemiss.Par.0004.File.tmp/Liste%20des%20Etats‐Site%20Internet‐05.03.2007.pdf (site no longer available; PDF in author's possession).Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L., and Perrelli, Roberto. 2002. Politics, the WTO and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases. Pacific Economic Review 7 (2): 335–57.Google Scholar
Grinols, Earl L., and Perrelli, Roberto. 2006. The WTO Impact on International Trade Disputes: An Event History Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 613–24.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew, and Simmons, Beth A. 2002. To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1): S205‐S36.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew, and Simmons, Beth A. 2005. Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendents in WTO Disputes. Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2): 557–98.Google Scholar
Holmes, Peter. 2001. The WTO and the EU: Some Constitutional Comparisons. Discussion Paper No. 78. Sussex at Brighton Discussion Papers in Economics.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2004. Still “Hazy” after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case‐law on Tax Discrimination. European Journal of International Law 15 (1): 39–69.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2006a. A Survey of the Literature on the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Working Paper No. 684. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2006b. WTO Dispute Settlement Database. http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/0,,contentMDK:20804376~pagePK:64214825~piPK:64214943~theSitePK:469382,00.html (accessed April 27, 2010).Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C., and Nordström, Håkan. 1999. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased? Discussion Paper No. 2340. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E. 1996. International Economic Law: The Political Theatre Dimension. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17 (1): 9–15.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jawara, Fatoumata, and Kwa, Aileen. 2003. Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert, and Silbey, Susan. 2003. In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come out Ahead? Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, Constantine. 1998. The Participation of the Developing Countries in the WTO. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1906. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Nordström, Håkan. 2005. The Cost of WTO Litigation, Legal Aid, and Small Claims Procedures. Paper presented at theWTO Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries: Use, Implications, Strategies, and Reforms, May 20–21, 2005 at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, and Mavroidis, Petros C. 1998. The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law. American Journal of International Law 92 (3): 398–413.Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2004. Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2000. Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules Are Rules—Toward a More Collective Approach. American Journal of International Law 94: 335–47.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (2): 174–95.Google Scholar
Rivera, Lauren A. 2008. Managing “Spoiled” National Identity: War, Tourism, and Memory in Croatia. American Sociological Review 73 (4): 613–34.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Renato. 1997. The Future Path of the Multilateral Trading System. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sprr_e/seoul_e.htm (accessed April 27, 2010).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1977. Wallerstein's World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 1075–90.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus‐Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56 (2): 339.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P. 2007. Embedding Mutual Recognition at the WTO. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (5): 780–99.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1976. The Modern World‐System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World‐Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 2000. The Essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2007. WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice. Geneva: WTO Publications.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. n.d. Understanding the WTO: Settling Disputes. http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp1_e.htm (accessed April 26, 2010).Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Kazuo. 1991. Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zejan, Pilar, and Bartels, Frank L. 2006. Be Nice and Get Your Money: An Empirical Analysis of World Trade Organization Trade Disputes and Aid. Journal of World Trade 40 (6): 1021–47.Google Scholar