Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T14:17:16.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulow, Jeremy, and Rogoff, Kenneth. 1989. A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt. Journal of Political Economy 97:155–78.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, Sara, Najar, Margarita, and Walter, Mary. 1995. Constitutional Change: Is It Too Easy to Amend our State Constitution? In Constitutional Reform in California, ed. Cain, Bruce E. and Noll, Roger, 265–90. Berkeley, Cal.: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1988. Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy. In Constitutionalism and Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn, and Prescott, Edward. 1977. Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy 85:473–91.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. Constitutions and Credible Commitments: The Evolution of the Institutions of Public Choice in 17th Century England. Journal of Economic History 49, no. 4:803–32.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack. 1996. Original Meanings. New York: Alfred P. Knopf.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1996. Strategy of Rhetoric. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strotz, Robert. 1956. Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies 23:165–80.Google Scholar