Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:10:10.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Still Afraid of Legal Pluralism? Encountering Santi Romano

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Roger Cotterrell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The second edition of Santi Romano’s book, The Legal Order, now appearing in its first English translation (2017), is a pioneer text of legal pluralism. Its interest lies in its extreme radicalism and in the fact that, although it is written by a lawyer, its argument has many important political implications and addresses core conceptual issues in contemporary sociolegal studies of legal pluralism. The social and political context of Romano’s book in early twentieth-century Italy is far from being solely of historical interest. Issues that surrounded his juristic thinking in its time resonate with important political and social issues of today.

Type
Review Symposium: Law and Society Meets Jurisprudence
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 539 - 558
Copyright
© American Bar Foundation 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnaud, André-Jean. “Legal Pluralism and the Building of Europe.” In Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law, edited by Petersen, Hanne and Zahle, Henrik, 149–69. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth, 1995.Google Scholar
Bader, Veit. “Legal Pluralism and Differentiated Morality: Shari'a in Ontario?” In Legal Practice and Cultural Diversity, edited by Ralph, Grillo, et al., 49–72. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Barber, N. W. “Legal Pluralism and the European Union.” European Law Journal 12 (2006): 306–29.Google Scholar
Barberis, Mauro. “Santi Romano, Neoinstitutionalism and Legal Pluralism.” National Italian American Bar Association Law Journal 21 (2013): 27–35.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. “Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 47 (2002): 37–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benewick, Robert. “Gaetano Mosca 1858-1941.” In Routledge Dictionary of Twentieth Century Thinkers, edited by Benewick, Robert and Green, Philip, 165–66. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. “The Globalization of Jurisdiction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2002): 311–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranta, Roberto. “The Fall from Fundamentalism in Italian Administrative Law.” In The Public-Private Law Divide: Potential for Transformation?, edited by Ruffert, Matthias, 99–121. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and William, M. O’Barr. “Back to the Trobriands: The Enduring Influence of Malinowski’s Crime and Custom in Savage Society.” Law & Social Inquiry 27, no. 4 (2002): 847–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. Sociological Jurisprudence: Juristic Thought and Social Inquiry. New York / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Croce, Mariano. “Afterword.” In The Legal Order, 2nd ed., by Romano, Santi, translated by Mariano Croce, 111–28. New York / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Dalberg-Larsen, Jorgen. The Unity of Law: An Illusion? On Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Galda & Wilch, 2000.Google Scholar
Fioravanti, Maurizio. “L’Ordinamento Giuridico.” In The Formation and Transmission of Western Legal Culture: 150 Books that Made the Law in the Age of Printing, edited by Dauchy, Serge, et al., 442–44. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, Filippo. “Santi Romano and L'ordinamento giuridico: The Relevance of a Forgotten Masterpiece for Contemporary International, Transnational and Global Legal Relations.” Transnational Legal Theory 2, no. 1 (2011): 67–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourneret, Jessica. “France: Banning Legal Pluralism by Passing a Law.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 29, no. 2 (2006): 233–49.Google Scholar
Francescakis, Philippe. “Introduction à l’Edition Francaise.” In L’Ordre Juridique, 2nd ed., by Romano, Santi, translated by Francois, Lucien and Gothot, Pierre, v–xix. Paris: Dalloz [1975] 2002.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Carole. “A Law of Their Own: Native Challenges to American Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 25, no. 1 (2000): 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18, no. 24 (1986): 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, John. “Legal Pluralism and the Theory of Legislation—With Special Reference to the Regulation of Euthanasia.” In Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law, edited by Petersen, Hanne and Zahle, Henrik, 201–341. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth, 1995.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian. “A New Type of Conflicts Law as the Legal Paradigm of the Postnational Constellation.” In Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets , edited by Joerges, Christian and Falke, Josef, 465–501. Oxford: Hart, 2011.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Wedberg, A.. New York: Russell & Russell, [1945] 1961.Google Scholar
La Torre, Massimo. “Legal Pluralism as an Evolutionary Achievement of Community Law.” Ratio Juris 12 (1999): 182–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosca, Gaetano. The Ruling Class. Translated by Kahn, Hannah D.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.Google Scholar
Muir Watt, Horatia. “Private International Law Beyond the Schism.” Transnational Legal Theory 2, no. 3 (2011): 347–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussolini, Benito. “Foundations and Doctrine of Fascism.” In A Primer of Italian Fascism, edited by Schnapp, Jeffrey T., 46–71. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2000a.Google Scholar
Mussolini, Benito. “Address to the National Corporative Council.” In A Primer of Italian Fascism, edited by Schnapp, Jeffrey T., 154–64. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2000b.Google Scholar
Petersen, Hanne, and Zahle, Henrik, eds. Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth, 1995.Google Scholar
Pospisil, Leopold J.Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
Romano, Santi. “L’Etat Moderne et Sa Crise.” Translated by D. Soldini. Jus politicum: Revue de Droit Politique 14 (2015).Google Scholar
Romano, Santi. The Legal Order. 2nd ed. Translated by Croce, Mariano. New York / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, Nicole, and Halpin, Andrew, eds. In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandulli, Aldo. “Santi Romano and the Perception of the Public Law Complexity.” Translated by Mariniello, Maria Luce. Italian Journal of Public Law 1 (2009): 1–38.Google Scholar
Soldini, David. “Santi Romano, Penseur Pluraliste et Etatiste.” Jus Politicum: Revue de Droit Politique 14 (2015).Google Scholar
Stone, Julius. Social Dimensions of Law and Justice. Sydney: Maitland, 1966.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Discovering ‘Social Control.’” Journal of Law and Society 12, no. 2 (1985): 111–34.10.2307/1409963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, Latif. Legal Pluralism in Action: Dispute Resolution and the Kurdish Peace Committee. New York / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. “Brexit: When Taking Back Control Means Giving Up Control.” Politico, Sept. 12, 2017. https://www.politico.eu/article/brexit-taking-back-control-united-kingdom-giving-up-control/.Google Scholar
Varella, Marcelo Dias. “Central Aspects of the Debate on Complexity and Fragmentation of International Law.” Emory International Law Review 27 (2013): 1–22.Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars. “Santi Romano against the State?” Ethics & Global Politics 11, no. 2 (2018): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welk, William G.Fascist Economic Policy: An Analysis of Italy’s Economic Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Woodman, Gordon R. “Legal Pluralism and the Search for Justice.” Journal of African Law 40, no. 2 (1997): 152–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, Gordon R. “Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 30, no. 42 (1998): 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanetti, Gianfrancesco. “Italian Normative Pluralism: What Is Unique about the Future of Italy.” California Italian Studies 2, no. 1 (2011).Google Scholar