Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T08:53:45.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong: Lessons for Hybrid Regime Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2020

Julius Yam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A hybrid regime court faces a legitimacy paradox: an activist court risks attracting backlash from the incumbent, whereas a deferential court may undermine public trust. The Hong Kong courts, at least in the twenty or so years following handover, provide an example of courts successfully navigating the legitimacy paradox despite the conflicting expectations from political actors. This article draws on the experiences of the Hong Kong courts to better understand the legitimacy paradox. It identifies three tools that Hong Kong courts have used to maneuver through the paradox, namely (1) the differential treatment of cases according to political stakes; (2) the use of comparative jurisprudence; and (3) the commitment to procedural justice. Studying these techniques may provide relevant insights to courts in similarly constrained political environments as to how judicial legitimacy can be earned. The article also reflects on the institutional future of Hong Kong courts in light of the increasing polarization of Hong Kong society as a result of the anti-extradition bill protests and signs of greater interference from Mainland China.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 153 - 191
Copyright
© 2020 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Nick Barber, Lisa Bernstein, Cora Chan, Yu-Jie Chen, Anna Dziedzic, Tom Ginsburg, Yicong Guo, Ran Hirschl, Gerald Rosenberg, participants of the Legal Scholarship Workshop 2016–17, University of Chicago, and the five anonymous reviewers for their help, suggestions, and comments. Previous versions were presented at the Illiberal Democracy Workshop (at the tenth World Congress 2018 organized by the International Association of Constitutional Law) and the Younger Scholars Forum in Comparative Law (at the twentieth International Congress 2018 organized by the International Academy of Comparative Law).

The article was written before the promulgation of the Hong Kong national security law.

References

REFERENCES

Amnesty International. 2019. Barriers to Gender-Affirming Treatments for Transgender People in China. October 21. https://www.amnesty.org.nz/sites/default/files/China-%20Barriers%20to%20gender-affirming%20treatments%20for%20transgender%20people%20in%20China%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Apple Daily (Hong Kong). 2009. “最後屏障突換馬震動全港司法獨立法治原則堪憂” [A change in personnel of the final barrier shocks Hong Kong, judicial independence at risk]. September 3.Google Scholar
Associated Press (Beijing). 2019. “China Vows Bolstered Legal Measures over Hong Kong Protests.” November 1. https://apnews.com/7bf928b1273c49c1b0bc981d3777dbcf?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2009. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beal, Thom. 1999 “Defacing China Flag Is Ruled Criminal Act: Freedom of Expression Not Absolute, Court in Hong Kong Affirms.” Asian Wall Street Journal, December 16.Google Scholar
Bobek, Michal. 2013. Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36, no. 3: 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Cora. 2016. “The Legal Limits on Beijing’s Powers to Interpret Hong Kong’s Basic Law.” Hong Kong University Legal Scholarship Blog, November 3. http://researchblog.law.hku.hk/2016/11/cora-chan-on-legal-limits-of-beijings.html.Google Scholar
Chan, Cora 2019. “Thirty Years from Tiananmen: China, Hong Kong, and the Ongoing Experiment to Preserve Liberal Values in an Authoritarian State.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17, no. 2: 439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Holmes. 2018. “Chief Executive Calls Attack on Hong Kong Judges ‘Unacceptable’ after Pro-Beijing Politician Slams Court Ruling.” Hong Kong Free Press, September 11. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/09/11/chief-executive-calls-attack-hong-kong-judges-unacceptable-pro-beijing-politician-slams-court-ruling/.Google Scholar
Chan, Johannes M. M. 2019. “A Shrinking Space: A Dynamic Relationship between the Judiciary in a Liberal Society of Hong Kong and a Socialist-Leninist Sovereign State.” Current Legal Problems 72, no. 1: 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Johannes M. M. 2020. “Five Reasons to Question the Legality of a National Security Law for Hong Kong.” Verfassungsblog, June 1. https://verfassungsblog.de/five-reasons-to-question-the-legality-of-a-national-security-law-for-hong-kong/.Google Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. 2009. “The Theory, Constitution and Practice of Autonomy: The Case of Hong Kong.” In One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders: Perspectives of Evolution, edited by Oliveira, Jorge Costa and Cardinal, Paulo, 751–67. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. 2017. “Social Movements and the Law: The Case of Hong Kong.” In Civil Unrest and Governance in Hong Kong: Law and Order from Historical and Cultural Perspectives, edited by Michael, H. K. Ng and Wong, John D., 117–40. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jianzhong (陈建中). 2015. “陈建中 ：司法覆核”已成反对派瘫痪政府的工具” [Chen Jianzhong: judicial review has become the tool of the opposition to paralyze the government]. Takungpo, December 3.Google Scholar
Cheng, Edmund W. 2016. “Street Politics in a Hybrid Regime: The Diffusion of Political Activism in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” China Quarterly 226: 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Kevin Kwok-yin. 2018. “Legitimacy in a Postcolonial Legal System: Public Perception of Procedural Justice and Moral Alignment toward the Courts in Hong Kong.” Law & Social Inquiry 43, no. 1: 212–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Gary. 2015. “Judicial Reviews Fundamental to Rule of Law in Hong Kong, Says Former Top Judge Andrew Li.” South China Morning Post, December 14.Google Scholar
Cheung, Kris. 2018. “Consulate Hits Back after Hong Kong Pro-Beijing Media and Lawmakers Compare Journalist’s Expulsion to UK Visa Denials.” Hong Kong Free Press, October 15. https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/10/15/consulate-hits-back-hong-kong-lawmakers-compare-journalists-expulsion-uk-visa-denials/.Google Scholar
Cheung, Mei Wah (張美華). 2020. “逾7000人被捕 被控僅一成多 重溫主要事件拘控情況” [Around 7,000 arrested, prosecution rate around 10 percent, a review of key prosecutions]. HK01, January 4. https://www.hk01.com/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E/417468/%E9%80%83%E7%8A%AF%E6%A2%9D%E4%BE%8B-%E9%80%BE7000%E4%BA%BA%E8%A2%AB%E6%8D%95-%E8%A2%AB%E6%8E%A7%E5%83%85%E4%B8%80%E6%88%90%E5%A4%9A-%E9%87%8D%E6%BA%AB%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6%E6%8B%98%E6%8E%A7%E6%83%85%E6%B3%81.Google Scholar
China Review News . 2014. “终审法院判决立法会主席可剪布” [The Court of Final Appeal decides that the president of the Legislative Council can curb filibuster]. September 30. http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1034/0/8/5/103408558.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=103408558.Google Scholar
China Review News . 2017. “香港的司法獨立可和經濟成就相媲美” [Hong Kong’s judicial independence comparable to economic success]. June 6.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.Google Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald. 2017. The Alchemists: Questioning Our Faith in Courts as Democracy-builders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Tom Gerald. 2019. “Democratic Decay: Conceptualising an Emerging Research Field.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, Erin F. 2016. “Analyzing Avoidance: Judicial Strategy in Comparative Perspective.” Duke Law Journal 66, no. 1: 1–67.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay. 2020. “Breaking Out of the Democratic Slump.” Journal of Democracy 31, no. 1: 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind, and Issacharoff, Samuel. 2016. “Living to Fight Another Day: Judicial Deferral in Defense of Democracy.” Wisconsin Law Review 2016: 683–731.Google Scholar
Dotan, Yoav, and Hofnung, Menachem. 2005. “Legal Defeats—Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court?” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 1: 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperly, Brad. 2016. “Political Competition and De Facto Judicial Independence in Non-Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 56, no. 2: 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2018. Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fok, Joseph. 2017. “Judges from Other Common Law Jurisdictions in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal.” Paper presented at IBA Annual Conference Seoul, September 24.Google Scholar
Fong, Brian. 2013. “State-Society Conflicts under Hong Kong’s Hybrid Regime: Governing Coalition Building and Civil Society Challenges.” Asian Survey 53, no. 5: 854–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92, no. 2: 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2008. “Administrative Law and the Judicial Control of Agents in Authoritarian Regimes.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 58–72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick. 1987. “Persuasive Authority.” McGill Law Journal 32: 261–98.Google Scholar
Griffiths, James. 2018. “Hong Kong Denies Entry to Senior British Journalist amid Free Speech Concerns.” CNN, November 9. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/08/asia/hong-kong-freedom-expression-victor-mallet-intl/index.html.Google Scholar
Groppi, Tania, and Ponthoreau, Marie-Claire, eds. 2013. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, Javier C., and Mou, Zoe. 2018. “‘I Am Gay, Not a Pervert’: Furor in China as Sina Weibo Bans Gay Content.” New York Times, April 15.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2014. “In Search of an Identity: Voluntary Foreign Citations in Discordant Constitutional Settings.” American Journal of Comparative Law 62: 547–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran 2018. “Judicial Review and the Politics of Comparative Citations: Theory, Evidence and Methodological Challenges.” In Comparative Judicial Review, edited by Delaney, Erin F. and Dixon, Rosalind, 403–22. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, James R., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2011. “Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6: 275–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Judiciary. 2018. Annex A Statistics on Applications for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (JR) (1997–2017). Prepared for the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, LCQ17: Statistical Information on Judicial Review Cases. February 28. http://gia.info.gov.hk/general/201802/28/P2018022800345_278993_1_1519793382371.pdf.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute. 2020. Impartiality of the Courts. April. https://www.pori.hk/pop-poll/rule-of-law-indicator/g004.Google Scholar
Hor, Michael. 2007. “Criminal Due Process in Hong Kong and Singapore: A Mutual Challenge.” Hong Kong Law Journal 37: 65–80.Google Scholar
Initium Media . 2017. “法夢 ：立法過程合法性何存？修改議事規則的危機” [Lawlaydream: the legality of the legislative process? the danger of amending the rules of procedures]. December 12. https://theinitium.com/article/20171212-notes-lawlaydream/.Google Scholar
Ip, Eric C. 2014a. “Constitutional Competition Between the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal and the Chinese National People’s Congress Standing Committee: A Game Theory Perspective.” Law & Social Inquiry 39, no. 4: 824–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, Eric C. 2014b. “The Democratic Foundations of Judicial Review under Authoritarianism: Theory and Evidence from Hong Kong.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 2: 330–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, Eric C. 2019. Hybrid Constitutionalism: The Politics of Constitutional Review in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, Mike. 2019. “Gay Official Wins Court Battle for Spousal Benefits in Hong Kong.” New York Times, June 6.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhaveri, Swati. 2011. “Judicialising Politics: The Role of the Courts in Electoral Reform in Hong Kong.” Public Law 2011: 227–35.Google Scholar
Jhaveri, Swati, and Scully-Hill, Anne. 2015. “Executive and Legislative Reactions to Judicial Declarations of Constitutional Invalidity in Hong Kong: Engagement, Acceptance or Avoidance?” International Journal of Constitutional Law 13, no. 2: 507–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeding, Malte Philipp. 2017. “The Rise of ‘Localism’ in Hong Kong.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 1: 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalb, Johanna. 2013. “The Judicial Role in New Democracies: A Strategic Account of Comparative Citation.” Yale Journal of International Law 38: 423–65.Google Scholar
Kang, Wenqing. 2012. “The Decriminalization and Depathologization of Homosexuality in China.” In China in and beyond the Headlines, edited by Weston, Timothy B. and Jensen, Lionel M., 231–48. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A.. 2013. “Introduction.” In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A., 1–42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, Karen. 2009. “Public Interest Litigation in Hong Kong: A New Hope for Social Transformation?” Civil Justice Quarterly 28, no. 3: 327–43.Google Scholar
Kwong, Ying-ho. 2018. “Political Repression in a Sub-National Hybrid Regime: The PRC’s Governing Strategies in Hong Kong.” Contemporary Politics 24, no. 4: 361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landler, Mark. 1999. “After 2 Years, Hong Kong Looks More Like China.” New York Times, July 1.Google Scholar
Lau, Alyssa. 2005. “Hong Kong Reverses Falun Gong Convictions.” New York Times, May 6.Google Scholar
Lau, Chris. 2018. “Hong Kong’s Top Court Denies 31 Major Banks and Law Firms’ Bid to Support Lesbian Expat ‘QT’ in LGBT Rights Battle.” South China Morning Post, May 1.Google Scholar
Lau, Chris 2019. “Ousted Pro-Democracy Legislator ‘Long Hair’ Leung Kwok-Hung Loses Bid to Take Case to Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal.” South China Morning Post, June 13.Google Scholar
Lau, Holning, Lau, Charles, Loper, Kelley, and Suen, Yiu-tung. 2018. Support in Hong Kong for Same-Sex Couple’s Rights Grew over Four Years (2013–2017): Over Half of People in Hong Kong Support Same-Sex Marriage. Hong Kong: Centre for Comparative and Public Law at the University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Law, David S. 2008. “A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review.” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 723–801.Google Scholar
Law, David S. 2015. “Judicial Comparativism and Judicial Diplomacy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 163: 927–1036.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Chang, Wen-Chen. 2011. “The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue.” Washington Law Review 86: 523–77.Google Scholar
Lee, John Ka-chiu. 2019. “Plugging a Legal Loophole to Ensure Fugitives Face Justice.” China Daily, 28 February. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/articles/90/235/142/1551322452454.html.Google Scholar
Leung, Ambrose. 2008. “Xi Tells Tsang to Govern Sensibly.” South China Morning Post, July 8.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2011. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Jun [李俊]. 2019. “法官絕不能充當暴行庇護者” [Judges cannot cover for violence]. Takungpo, August 18. http://www.takungpao.com.hk/news/232109/2019/0818/337683.html.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan José. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lo, Pui Yin. 2014a. “Impact of Jurisprudence beyond Hong Kong.” In Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Development of the Law in China’s Hong Kong, edited by Young, Simon N. M. and Ghai, Yash, 579–607. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Pui Yin. 2014b. The Judicial Construction of Hong Kong’s Basic Law: Courts, Politics, and Society after 1997. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Pui Yin. 2018. “Enforcing an Unfortunate, Unnecessary and ‘Unquestionably Binding’ NPCSC Interpretation: The Hong Kong Judiciary’s Deconstruction of Its Construction of the Basic Law.” Hong Kong Law Journal 48: 399–430.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Clark B. 2008. “Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court: Managing Constitutional Conflict in an Authoritarian, Aspirationally Islamic State.” Journal of Comparative Law 3: 234–53.Google Scholar
Loud, Lewis [盧斯達]. 2020. “大聲公襲警罪成 區諾軒用個人例子答你「法治點死」” [Convicted of assault using loudspeaker, Au Nok-hin uses his personal example to answer how rule-of-law died]. Stand News, May 11.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Anna, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2019. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New about It?” Democratization 26, no. 7: 1095–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lui, Bruce [呂秉權]. 2014. “呂秉權﹕誓死保衛香港的最後防線 : 司法獨立” [Bruce Lui: protecting Hong Kong’s last line of defense at all costs—judicial independence]. Mingpao, June 21.Google Scholar
Ma, Ngok. 2007. Political Development in Hong Kong: State, Political Society and Civil Society. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Ngok, and Chan, Kin-Man. 2008. “Asian Barometer—Hong Kong Report: The State of Democratic Governance in Hong Kong.” Paper presented at the Asian Barometer Conference on the State of Democratic Governance in Asia, Taipei, China, June 20–21.Google Scholar
Mak, Elaine. 2015. “Comparative Law before the Supreme Courts of the UK and the Netherlands: An Empirical and Comparative Analysis.” In Courts and Comparative Law, edited by Andenaes, Mats and Fairgrieve, Duncan, 407–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Anthony. 2007. “The Place of Comparative Law in Developing the Jurisprudence on the Rule of Law and Human Rights in Hong Kong.” Hong Kong Law Journal 37: 299–317.Google Scholar
Mingpao . 2019. “張建宗 ：香港司法獨立排亞洲第一讚紀律部隊克盡厥職「深感驕傲」” [Matthew Cheung: Hong Kong judicial independence ranked Asia’s best, deeply proud of the disciplinary forces]. January 6.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir, and Ginsburg, Tom. 2008. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 1–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MVA Hong Kong Limited. 2006. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexual. https://www.hab.gov.hk/file_manager/en/documents/policy_responsibilities/public_consultation/public_homosexuals_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Ng, Kwai Hang, and Jacobson, Brynna. 2017. “How Global Is the Common Law? A Comparative Study of Asian Common Law Systems—Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Singapore.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 12, no. 2: 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 2005. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Mark. 2020. “Why Hong Kong Conflicts Could Worsen under New HKMAO Chief.” EJ Insight, February 20. https://www.ejinsight.com/eji/article/id/2380233/20200220-why-hong-kong-conflicts-could-worsen-under-new-hkmao-chief.Google Scholar
Ottaway, Marina. 2003. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Peterson, Carole J. 2016. “International Law and the Rights of Gay Men in Former British Colonies: Comparing Hong Kong and Singapore.” Hong Kong Law Journal 46: 109–29.Google Scholar
Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1999. “Is Standing Law or Politics?” North Carolina Law Review 77: 1741–90.Google Scholar
Radio Television Hong Kong . 2019. “袁國勇 ：反修例示威衝突受傷人數可能逾2000人” [Yuen Kwok-yung: anti-extradition bill protests injuries possibly exceed 2,000]. August 15. https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1474890-20190815.htm.Google Scholar
Radmilovic, Vuk. 2010. “Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec Secession Reference and Beyond.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43, no. 4: 843–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 23, no. 2: 721–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramzy, Austin. 2018. “Hong Kong Court Throws Out Protest Leaders’ Prison Sentences.” New York Times, February 6.Google Scholar
Sanchez Urribarri, Raul A. 2011. “Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court.” Law & Social Inquiry 36, no. 4: 854–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2006. “The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism.” In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, edited by Schedler, Andreas, 1–23. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 2008. “Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 326–35. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Dan, and Scurich, Nicholas. 2011. “Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8, no. 4: 709–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sing, Ming. 2010. “Explaining Mass Support for Democracy in Hong Kong.” Democratization 17: 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singtao , 2000. “鄭經翰誹謗案上訴得直” [Albert Cheng case successfully appeals]. November 14.Google Scholar
Siu, Jasmine. 2017. “Pro-Democracy Legislator Guilty of Desecrating Hong Kong and China Flags.” South China Morning Post, September 29.Google Scholar
South China Morning Post . 2014. “Protesters Defiant after High Court Orders Them to Leave Mong Kok and Admiralty Sites.” October 20.Google Scholar
Stand News . 2018. “林鄭 ：侮辱法官不可接受 不認同成立監察法庭機構” [Carrie Lam: insulting judges is unacceptable, objects proposal to setting up judicial supervision body]. January 9. https://thestandnews.com/politics/%E6%9E%97%E9%84%AD-%E4%BE%AE%E8%BE%B1%E6%B3%95%E5%AE%98%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E6%8E%A5%E5%8F%97-%E4%B8%8D%E8%AA%8D%E5%90%8C%E6%88%90%E7%AB%8B%E7%9B%A3%E5%AF%9F%E6%B3%95%E5%BA%AD%E6%A9%9F%E6%A7%8B/.Google Scholar
Swaine, Michael. 2010. “China’s Assertive Behavior: Part One: On ‘Core Interests’.” China Leadership Monitor 34: 1–25. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CLM34MS_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. 2012. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarn, May. 1999. “Court Crisis after Flag Row.” The Standard, March 25.Google Scholar
Tezcür, Güneş M. 2009. “Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case.” Law & Society Review 43: 305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torode, Greg, and Pomfret, James. 2020. “Hong Kong Judges Battle Beijing over Rule of Law as Pandemic Chills Protests.” Reuters. April 14. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/hongkong-politics-judiciary/.Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei. 2004. “Less Democracy, More Courts: A Puzzle of Judicial Review in Russia. Law & Society Review 38, no. 3: 513–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochev, Alexei, and Ellet, Rachel. 2014. “Judges and Their Allies: Rethinking Judicial Autonomy through the Prism of Off-bench Resistance.” Journal of Law and Courts 2: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2003. “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law.” Crime and Justice 30: 283–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacks, Raymond. 2000. “Our Flagging Rights.” Hong Kong Law Journal 30: 1–5.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal . 2020. “China’s Hong Kong Roundup.” April 19. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-hong-kong-roundup-11587310986.Google Scholar
Wang, Zhenmin [王振民], and Sun, Cheng [孫成]. 2014. “香港法院適用中國憲法問題研究” [A study of the applicability of the Chinese Constitution to Hong Kong Courts]. [Beijing: Politics and Law] 4: 4–9.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, et al. 2008. “The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, no. 3: 470–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Western, Neil. 1998. “Showdown Looms in Case of Children Seeking Abode.” Hong Kong Standard, June 17.Google Scholar
Wong, Brian. 2020. “Hong Kong Judge Barred from Anti-Government Protest Cases after Cultural Revolution Remark about Demonstrators, Sympathising with Lennon Wall Knifeman.” South China Morning Post, April 27. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3081815/hong-kong-judge-barred-anti-government-protest-cases.Google Scholar
Wong, Natalie. 2020. “Senior Adviser to Beijing Lashes Out at ‘Insufficient’ Hong Kong Leadership and Warns Shake-up May Be Coming.” South China Morning Post, March 14. https://www.scmp.com/news/article/3075236/senior-adviser-beijing-lashes-out-insufficient-hong-kong-leadership-and-warns.Google Scholar
Wong, Stan Hok-Wui. 2015. Electoral Politics in Post-1997 Hong Kong. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Timothy, and Wan, Shirley. 2007. “Citizens’ Evaluations of Legitimacy in Post-Colonial Hong Kong: Results of a Longitudinal Study.” In The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Its First Decade, edited by Cheng, Joseph, 75–107. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Xinhua Net . 2020. Central Gov’t Supports Latest HK Anti-Mask Ruling. April 13. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-04/13/c_138972528.htm.Google Scholar
Xinhua News . 2007. “吴邦国在纪念香港基本法实施十周年座谈会上讲话” [Bangguo Wu’s speech at the tenth anniversary of the Hong Kong Basic Law]. June 6.Google Scholar
Yang, Jiemian. 2015. “China’s ‘New Diplomacy’ under the Xi Jinping Administration.” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 1, no. 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Lillian. 2020. “‘This Is the End of Hong Kong’: China Pushes Controversial Security Laws.” Guardian, May 21. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/21/china-proposes-controversial-national-security-law-for-hong-kong.Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen. 2007. “10 Years of the Basic Law: The Rise, Retreat and Resurgence of Judicial Power in Hong Kong.” Hong Kong Law Journal 36: 166–91.Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen. 2019. “Twenty Years of the Basic Law: Continuity and Changes in the Geoffrey Ma Court.” Hong Kong Law Journal 29: 209–38.Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen, and Jiang, Zixin. 2020. “Electoral Disqualification, Political Allegiance, and the Courts: A ‘Fruitless Debate?’” Hong Kong Law Journal 49: 825–34.Google Scholar
Yau, Cannix. 2005. “Leung to Fight Wiretap Order.” The Standard, August 16.Google Scholar
Yew, Lun Tian. 2020. “China’s Hong Kong Law Set to Bar Foreign Judges from National Security Cases: Sources.” Reuters, May 26. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-parliament-hongkong-security/chinas-hong-kong-law-set-to-bar-foreign-judges-from-national-security-cases-sources-idUSKBN2321CW.Google Scholar
Young, Simon N. M. 2011. Constitutional Rights in Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal. Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs 27: 67–96.Google Scholar
Young, Simon N. M., and Da Roza, Antonio. 2013. “Final Appeals Then and Now.” In Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal: The Development of the Law in China’s Hong Kong, edited by Young, Simon N. M. and Ghai, Yash, 145–72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Simon N. M., and Law, Anthony. 2007. “Privileged to Vote: Inequalities and Anomalies of the FC System.” In Functional Constituencies: A Unique Feature of the Hong Kong Legislative Council, edited by Loh, Christine and Exchange, Civic, 59–109. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Zeng, Jinghan, Xiao, Yuefan, and Breslin, Shaun. 2015. “Securing China’s Core Interests: The State of the Debate in China.” International Affairs 91, no. 2: 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Yuchao. 2011. “‘Performance Legitimacy’ and China’s Political Adaptation Strategy.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16, no. 2: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CASES CITED

Chan Ho Tin v. Lo Ying Ki Alan [2018] 2 HKLRD 7.Google Scholar
Chan Yu Nam v. Secretary of Justice [2012] 3 HKC 38.Google Scholar
Chen Li Hung & Ors. v Ting Lei Miao & Ors . (2000) 3 HKCFAR 9.Google Scholar
Chief Executive of HKSAR v. President of Legislative Council [2016] 6 HKC 417.Google Scholar
Chow Ting v Teng Yu Yan Anne (Returning Officer) [2019] 4 HKLRD 459.Google Scholar
Democratic Republic of the Congo v. FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (No 1) (2011) 14 HKCFAR 95.Google Scholar
Designing Hong Kong Ltd v. Town Planning Board (2018) 21 HKCFAR 237.Google Scholar
Director of Immigration v. Chong Fung Yuen (2001) 4 HKCFAR 211.Google Scholar
Epoch Group Ltd v. Director of Immigration (2011) 3 HKLRD H2.Google Scholar
HKSAR v. Chow Nok Hang (2013) 16 HKCFAR 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HKSAR v. Koo Sze Yiu (2014) 17 HKCFAR 811.Google Scholar
HKSAR v. Ng Kung Siu & Anor . [1999] 3 HKLRD 907.Google Scholar
HKSAR v. Wong Chi Fung [2018] 2 HKLRD 657.Google Scholar
Koo Sze Yiu & Anor. v. Chief Executive of the HKSAR (2006) 9 HKCFAR 441.Google Scholar
Kwok Cheuk Kin v. Chief Executive of HKSAR [2015] HKEC 1220.Google Scholar
Kwok Wing Hang v Chief Executive in Council (No 2) [2020] 1 HKLRD 1.Google Scholar
Lau Kong Yung & Ors. v Director of Immigration [1999] 3 HKLRD 778.Google Scholar
Leung Chun Kwong v. Secretary for Civil Service [2019] 4 HKC 281.Google Scholar
Leung Chung Hang Sixtus v President of Legislative Council [2019] 1 HKLRD 292.Google Scholar
Leung Kwok Hung & Anor. v. Chief Executive of the HKSAR [2006] HKEC 239.Google Scholar
Leung Kwok Hung v. President of the Legislative Council (No 1) (2014) 17 HKCFAR 689.Google Scholar
Leung Lai Kwok Yvonne v. Chief Secretary for Administration [2015] HKEC 1034.Google Scholar
Ng Ka Ling & Ors. v. Director of Immigration [1999a] 1 HKLRD 315.Google Scholar
Ng Ka Ling & Ors. v. Director of Immigration (No 2) (1999b) 2 HKCFAR 141.Google Scholar
Q. T. v. Director of Immigration [2018] 4 HKC 403.Google Scholar
Secretary of Justice v. Yau Yuk Lung [2007] 3 HKRD 903.Google Scholar
Tse Wai Chun v. Albert Cheng [2000] 3 HKLRD 418.Google Scholar
W. v. Registrar of Marriages [2013] 3 HKLRD 90.Google Scholar
Yau Wai Ching v Chief Executive of HKSAR (2017) 20 HKCFAR 390.Google Scholar
Yeung May Wan & Ors. v. HKSAR [2005] 2 HKLRD 212.Google Scholar

STATUTES CITED

Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Adopted by the Seventh National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China at its Third Session on April 4, 1990 and came into effect on July 1, 1997.Google Scholar
Interpretation of Articles 22(4) and 24(2)(3) of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People’s Congress at its Tenth Session, June 26, 1999.Google Scholar
Interpretation of Article 104 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People’s Congress at its Twenty-fourth Session, November 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Bill of Rights Ordinance, 1997, Cap. 383.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, 1997, Cap. 484.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules, 1997, Cap. 484, section 39.Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar
Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Adopted by the Seventh National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China at its Third Session on April 4, 1990 and came into effect on July 1, 1997.Google Scholar
Interpretation of Articles 22(4) and 24(2)(3) of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People’s Congress at its Tenth Session, June 26, 1999.Google Scholar
Interpretation of Article 104 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People’s Congress at its Twenty-fourth Session, November 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Bill of Rights Ordinance, 1997, Cap. 383.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, 1997, Cap. 484.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules, 1997, Cap. 484, section 39.Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar