Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:54:26.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coda: Law, History, and Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2021

Abstract

In this Coda to the symposium on my book In the Matter of Nat Turner: A Speculative History, I address the relationship in the book between law, history, and theory. Writing history informed by theory has always been important to me, for historical research is at least as much an engagement in interpretation as an exercise in description.

Type
Review Symposium on Christopher Tomlins’s In the Matter of Nat Turner
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allmendinger, David F. Jr. Nat Turner and the Rising in Southampton County. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014 Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Capitalism as Religion.” In Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Volume 1, 1913–1926. Edited by Bullock, Marcus and Michael, W. Jennings, 288–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1921) 2004a.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Critique of Violence.” In Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Volume 1, 1913–1926. Edited by Bullock, Marcus and Michael, W. Jennings, 236–52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1921) 2004b.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Paralipomena to ‘On the Concept of History.’” In Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Volume 4, 1938–1940. Edited by Eiland, Howard and Michael, W. Jennings, 401–11. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, (1940) 2006.Google Scholar
Breen, Patrick H. The Land Shall Be Deluged in Blood: A New History of the Nat Turner Revolt. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dew, Thomas Roderick. Review of the Debate in the Virginia Legislature of 1831 and 1832. Richmond, VA: Printed by T. W. White, 1832.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. “Introduction to the Paratext.New Literary History 22, no. 2 (1991): 261–72.10.2307/469037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harriss, M. Cooper. “On Christopher Tomlins’ In the Matter of Nat Turner: A Speculative History.Religious Studies Review 46, no. 3 (2020): 371–74.10.1111/rsr.14714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Vanessa M. “Book Review. In The Matter of Nat Turner: A Speculative History.” Journal of Social History 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shab010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. “The Strait Gate: The Past, History and Legal Scholarship.Law, Culture and the Humanities 5, no. 1 (2009): 1142.10.1177/1743872108096861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by Gerth, H.H. and Wright Mills, C., 129–56. New York: Oxford University Press, (1917) 1946.Google Scholar