Article contents
Contextualizing Bias Crimes: A Social and Theoretical Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0897654600013551/resource/name/firstPage-S0897654600013551a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003
References
Abel, Richard L.
1998. Speaking Respect, Respecting Speech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bagoric, Mirko, and Amarasekara, Kumar. 2000. The Errors of Retributivism. Melbourne University Law Review
24: 124–89.Google Scholar
Baker, John S. Jr.
2000.
United States v. Morrison and Other Arguments against “Hate Crimes” Legislation. Boston University Law Review
80: 1191–1225.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. The Principles of Penal Law. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: W. Tait.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republication Theory of Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, Michele. 2000. Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as an Articulated Purpose of Criminal Punishment. American Criminal Law Review
37: 1313–62.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean. 1996. Ten Arguments against Hate-Speech Regulation: How Valid
Northern Kentucky Law Review
23: 475–90.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Yun, David H.
1994. Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation. California Law Review
82: 871–92.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A.
1996. Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment, Crime and Justice
20: 1–89.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1933. Division of Labor in Societytrans. Simpson, George. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Torstein. 1983. Justifications of Punishment. In Philosophy and the Criminal Law, ed. Duff, Antony and Simmonds, Nigel. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C.
1927. Punishment as a Moral Agency: An Attempt to Reconcile the Retributive and the Utilitarian
View. Mind
36: 292–305.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black Skin, White Maskstrans. Markmann, Charles Lam. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2000. Hate Crime Statistics. In Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Report. Washington, D. C.: Federal Bureau of Investigation.Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul. 1993. The Color of Law. Northwestern University Law Review
87: 937–91.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. 2000. The Inefficiency of Mens Rea. California Law Review
88: 895–920.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, ed. 1999. Collected Papers of John Rawls. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gellman, Susan. 1991. Sticks and Stones Can Put You in Jail, But Can Words Increase Your Sentence? Constitutional and Policy Dilemmas of Ethnic Intimidation Laws. UCLA Law Review
39: 333–96.Google Scholar
Gey, Steven G.
1997. What if Wisconsin v. Mitchell Had Involved Martin Luther King Jr.? The Constitutional Flaws of Hate Crime Enhancement Statutes. George Washington Law Review
65: 1014–70.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1992. The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism, Social Philosophy and Policy
9: 118–32.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. L., and Trolier, T. K.
1986. Stereotypes and Stereotyping. In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, ed. Dovidio, John F. and Samuel, L.
Orlando, Gaertner, Fla.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A.
1968. Punishment and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herek, Gregory M.
1989. Hate Crimes against Lesbians and Gay Men: Issues for Research and Policy. American Psychologist
44: 948–55.Google Scholar
Hodgson, David H.
1967. Consequences of Utilitarianism: A Study in Normative Ethics and Legal Theory. Oxford, England: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Jacobs, James B., and Potter, Kimberly. 1998. Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie, and Grattet, Ryken
2001. Making Hate a Crime. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H., and Schulhofer, Stephen J.
1995. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kalam, Murad. 2000. Hate Crime Prevention. Harvard Journal on Legislation
37: 593–605.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, trans. Ladd, John. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kleg, Milton. 1993. Hate Prejudice and Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kupperman, J. J.
1982. Utilitarianism Today. Revue Internationale de Philosophie
36: 318–30.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M.
1993. Civil Rights and Criminal Wrongs: The Mens Rea of Federal Civil Rights Crime. Tulane Law Review
67: 2113–2224.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M.
1994. The Punishment of Hate: Toward a Normative Theory of Bias-Motivated Crimes. Michigan Law Review
93: 320–81.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M.
19992000. The Case for a Federal Bias Crime Law. National Black Law Journal
16: 144–68.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Judith. 1983. The Right, the All Right, and the Good. Yale Law Journal
92: 544–63.Google Scholar
Lyons, William. 1974. Deterrent Theory and Punishment of the Innocent. Ethics
84: 346–48.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1867. Letter from James Madison to General Lafayette (25 Nov. 1820). In Letters and Other Writings of James Madison. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J.
1989. Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story. Michigan Law Review
87: 2320–81.Google Scholar
McCord, David. 1998. Imagining a Retributivist Alternative to Capital Punishment. Florida Law Review
50: 1–143.Google Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1981. A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment. American Philosophical Quarterly.
18: 263–71.Google Scholar
Morsch, James. 1991. The Problem of Motive in Hate Crimes: The Argument against Presumptions of Racial Motivation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
82: 659–89.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G.
1985. Retributivism and the State's Interest in Punishment. In Criminal Justice, ed. Roland Pennock, J., and Chapman, John W.
New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Leon
1982. A Case against the Kantian Retributivist Theory of Punishment: A Response to Professor Pugsley. Hofstra Law Review
11: 273–306.Google Scholar
Perry, Barbara. 2001. In the Name of Hate: Understanding Hate Crimes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott, and Grattet, Ryken. 2000. Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning-Making, and the Institutionalization of Hate Crime Law. Law and Society Review
34: 567–606.Google Scholar
Primoratz, Igor. 1989. Justifying Legal Punishment. Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Pugsley, Robert A.
1979. Retributivism: A Just Basis for Criminal Sentences. Hofstra Law Review.
7: 379–405.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1948. Anti-Semite and Jew, trans. Becker, George J.
New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Scotting, Troy A.
2001. Hate Crimes and the Need for Stronger Federal Legislation. Akron Law Review
34: 853–92.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S.
1999. Punishing Hateful Motives: Old Wine in a New Bottle Revives Calls for Prohibition. Michigan Law Review
97: 1857–73.Google Scholar
Taslitz, Andrew E.
1999. Condemning the Racist Personality: Why the Critics of Hate Crimes Legislation Are Wrong. Boston College Law Review
40: 739–85.Google Scholar
Taslitz, Andrew E.
2000. Hate Crimes, Free Speech, and the Contract of Mutual Indifference. Boston University Law Review
80: 1283–1398.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2000. The Empirical Shortcomings of First Amendment Jurisprudence: A Historical Perspective on the Power of Hate Speech. Santa Clara Law Review
40: 729–86.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2001. Hate in Cyberspace: Regulating Hate Speech on the Internet. San Diego Law Review
38: 817–74.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2002. Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Uhrich, Craig L.
1999. Hate Crime Legislation: A Policy Analysis. Houston Law Review
36: 1467–1529.Google Scholar
Wang, Lu-in. 1997. The Transforming Power of “Hate”: Social Cognition Theory and the Harms of Bias-Related Crime. Southern California Law Review
71: 47–135.Google Scholar
Weiss, Joan C., Ehrlich, Howard J., and Larcom, Barbara E. K.
199192. Ethnoviolence at Work. Journal of Intergroup Relations
18(Winter): 21–33.Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley. 2000. Value Pluralism in Legal Ethics. Washington University Law Quarterly
78: 113–213.Google Scholar
Wexler, Chuck, and Marx, Gary T.
1986. When Law and Order Works: Boston's Innovative Approach to the Problem of Racial Violence. Crime and Delinquency
32: 205–23.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1972. Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by