Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T20:23:17.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Talk in Legal Settings: What Law and Society Studies Can Learn from a Conversation Analyst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Drew, Paul. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Courtroom Settings. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Banakar, Reza, and Travers, Max, eds. 2006. Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Oxford: Onati Institute for the Sociology of Law and Hart.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1999. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse and Society 10:543–82.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna, and Danet, Brenda. 1984. Challenge and Control in Lawyer-Client Interaction: A Case Study in an Israeli Legal Aid Setting. Text 4:249–75.Google Scholar
Burns, Stacy. 1997. Practicing Law: A Study of Pedagogic Interchange in a Law School Classroom. In Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law, eds. Travers, M. and Manzo, J. 1997, 265–88. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen. 1983. The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception. In The Sociology of the Professions, eds. Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. 1983. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carlen, Pat, and Burton, Frank. 1979. Official Discourse: On Discourse Analysis, Government Publications, Ideology and the State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conley, John, and O'Barr, William. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John, and O'Barr, William. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, eds. Drew, P. and Heritage, J. 1992, 418–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Adam, and Goodwin, Charles, eds. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmelman, Debra. 2003. Justice for the Poor: A Study of Criminal Defense Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert. 1969. Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patrick, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela. 1991. Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review. 56:818–35.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Culture, ed. Geertz, C. 330. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David, and Dingwall, Robert. 1989. Selective facilitation: Some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators. Law and Society Review 23:613–41.Google Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber, and Holstein, Jim. 1997. The New Language of Qualitative Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heumann, Milton. 1978. Plea-Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges and Defence Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan. 1994. Kadhi's Courts as Complex Sites of Resistance: The State, Islam and Gender in Postcolonial Kenya. In Contested States: Law, Hegemony and Resistance, eds. Lazarus-Black, M. and Hirsch, S. 207–30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Kress, Gunther. 1993. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell, ed. 1974. Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Komter, Martha. 1998. Dilemmas in the Courtroom: A Study of Trials of Violent Crime in the Netherlands. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marcus, George. 1998. Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Greg. 1993. Reproducing Rape: Domination Through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Doug. 1984. Inside Plea-Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1994. Legal Language: Pragmatics, Poetics and Social Power. Annual Review of Anthropology 23:435–55.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1996. Recontextualisation as Socialisation: Text and Pragmatics in the Law School Classroom. In Natural Histories of Discourse, eds. Silverstein, M. and Urban, G. 229249. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, Michael. 1988. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nettleton, Sarah. 1995. The Sociology of Health and Illness. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Phillips, Susan. 1998. Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on Methodology. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, eds. Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. 2127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William. 1997 Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas, eds. 1991. The Fate of Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1991. Reflections on Talk and Social Structure. In Talk and Social Structure, eds. Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D. 4470. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1998. Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society 9:413–16.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1999. Schegloff's texts as “Billig's data”: A critical reply. Discourse and Society 10:558–72.Google Scholar
Sharrock, Wes. 1979. Portraying the Professional Relationship. In Health Education and Practice, eds. Anderson, I. 125–46. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1965. Normal crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office. Social Problems 12:255–76.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael. 1997. Shamanism, Colonialism and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Travers, Max. 1997 The Reality of Law: Work and Talk in a Firm of Criminal Lawyers. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Trinch, Shonna. 2003. Latina's Narratives of Domestic Abuse: Discrepant Versions of Violence. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1987. Communicating racism: ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod. 1990. Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations. In Interaction Competence, ed. Psathas, G. 263–95. Lantham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod. 1997. The Presentation of Victim and Motive in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews. In Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law, eds. Travers, M. and Manzo, J. 7798. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Poststructuralism in Dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:387412.Google Scholar
Woofitt, Robin. 2005. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar