Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T00:22:22.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

War of the Worlds: History Versus the Law in Charles Wilkinson's American Indians, Time and the Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a discussion of Cohen and his influence, see Feldman, Stephen M., “Felix S. Cohen and His Jurisprudence: Reflections on Federal Indian Law,” 35 Buffalo L. Rev. 479525 (1986). The most recent revision of Cohen's Handbook (Wilkinson served as Man-aging Editor of the project) appeared in 1982; Felix Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law (Charlottesville, Va.: Michie Bobbs Merrill, 1982).Google Scholar

2 Robert, H. Keller Jr., Review of American Indians, Time and the Law, 74 J. Am. Hist. 492, and Burt, Larry, Review of American Indians, Time and the Law. 93 Am. Hist. Rev. 530 (1988).Google Scholar

3 See Dirk Johnson, “Indian Fishing Dispute Upsets North Woods' Quiet,”N.Y. Times, Apr. 24, 1988, at 12.Google Scholar

4 Clifton, James A., “The Political Rhetoric of Indian History: A Review Essay,” 49 Ann. Iowa 102, 103 (1987).Google Scholar

5 Milner S. Ball, “Constitution, Court, Indian Tribes,” 1987 ABF Res. J. 1–140.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 20, 138, 137.Google Scholar

7 105 S. Ct. 2451 (1985), quoted in Ball at 20.Google Scholar

8 The Montana Court is quoted in Wilkinson at 27.Google Scholar

9 Ball, 1987 ABF Res. J. at 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Id. at 10.Google Scholar

11 Id. at 39.Google Scholar

12 Clifton, 49 Ann. Iowa at 104 (cited in note 4).Google Scholar

13 For a discussion of the viability and potential of contemporary tribal governments (one of the few questions listed here that historians have examined), see Kenneth R. Philip, ed., Indian Self Rule: First Hand Accounts of Indian White Relations from Roosevelt to Reagan (Salt Lake City: Howe Bros., 1986), esp. at 239; and Tom Holm, “The Crisis in Tribal Government,” in Vine Deloria, Jr., ed., American Indian Policy in the Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985).Google Scholar