Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T00:48:43.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bargain Justice in an Unjust World: Good Deals in the Criminal Courts?

Review products

Milton Heumann, Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978. 220 + viii pp. $15.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE (1955) Model Penal Code (Tentative Draft Number 4). Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
ARNOLD, Thurman (1962) The Symbols of Government. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
BAKER, C. Edwin (1975) “The Ideology of the Economic Analysis of Law,” 5 Philosophy and Public Affairs 3.Google Scholar
BECKER, Gary (1968) “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” 76 Journal of Political Economy 169.Google Scholar
CASPER, Jonathan (1978) Criminal Courts: The Defendant's Perspective. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
DANZIG, R. and Michael, LOWY (1975) “Everyday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner,” 9 Law & Society Review 675.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Abraham (1960) “The State and the Accused: Balance of Advantage in Criminal Procedure,” 69 Yale Law Journal 1149.Google Scholar
HANEY, Craig (1979) “Social Psychology and the Criminal Law,” in Patricia Middlebrook, Social Psychology and Modern Life. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
HANEY, Craig and Philip, ZIMBARDO (1977) “The Socialization into Criminality: On Becoming a Prisoner and a Guard,” in Tapp, June and Levine, Felice (eds.) Law, Justice and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
HOGARTH, John (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEFF, Arthur (1974) “Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism,” 60 Virginia Law Review 451.Google Scholar
LEVIN, Martin A. (1977) Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
NAGEL, Stuart S. and Marian, NEEF (1976) “Plea Bargaining, Decision Theory, and Equilibrium Models,” 51 Indiana Law Journal 957.Google Scholar
NOONAN, John (1976) Persons and Masks of the Law. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'BRIEN, Stewart, Steven, PHETERSON, Michael, WRIGHT and Carl, HOSTICA (1977) “The Criminal Lawyer: The Defendant's Perspective,” 5 American Journal of Criminal Law 283.Google Scholar
PASHUKANIS, E. B. (1951) “The General Theory of Law and Marxism,” in Hugh Babb (trans, and ed.) Soviet Legal Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
PLAIT, Anthony and Randi, POLLOCK (1974) “Channeling Lawyers: The Careers of Public Defenders,” 9 Issues in Criminology 1.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1972) Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
SILBERMAN, Charles (1978) Criminal Violence and Criminal Justice. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
SUDNOW, David (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender's Office,” 12 Social Problems 255.Google Scholar
WILSON, James Q. (1975) Thinking about Crime. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
WOOCHER, Frederic, (1975) “Did Your Eyes Deceive You? Expert Psychological Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Identification,” 29 Stanford Law Review 969.Google Scholar