Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:32:43.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basketball in the Key of Law: The Significance of Disputing in Pick-Up Basketball

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Michael DeLand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the conception of law as a constructive and constitutive force is often stated, we have relatively few concrete and grounded case studies showing precisely where and how social actors construct the meaning of their engagements through the invocation of legality. Drawing on Erving Goffman's Frame Analysis (1974), I use the concept of “keying” to articulate how basketball players in informal “pick-up” games transform the meaning of their activity through disputing. By playing in a legalistic way, players constitute the game as “real” and “serious” rather than “mere play.” The analysis tracks basketball players in the heat of action as they perceive the game, call rule violations, contest those violations, and ultimately give up. Players organize each phase of the dispute's natural history in the “key of law” by constructing and comparing cases, invoking and interpreting rules, setting precedent, arguing over procedure, and proposing solutions. Through these practices, players infuse the game with rich meaning and generate the motivational context demanding that the game be treated as significant. This analysis contributes to an understanding of legal ontology that envisions law's essence as potentiating rather than repairing normative social life.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 653 - 685
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to acknowledge and thank Jack Katz, Bob Emerson, Zsuzsu Berend, Gale Miller, David Trouille, the UCLA Sociology Ethnography Working Group, the editors of the Law & Society Review, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and criticisms on earlier drafts of this article.

References

Adler, Patricia A., & Adler, Peter. (1983) “Dry with a Wink,” 12 J. of Contemporary Ethnography 123–39.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elijah (1999) Code of the Street. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene, & Kagan, Robert. (2002) Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. P. (1988) The Moral Order of a Suburb. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. (1963) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgement among the Tiv. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Scott (2009) Black Men Can't Shoot. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John L., & Roberts, Simon. (1981) Rules and Processes. the Cultural Logic of Dispute in An African Context. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O'Barr, William M. (1990) Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O'Barr, William M. (2004) “A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method in Legal Anthropology,” 29 Law & Social Inquiry 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Robert M. (1983) “Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harv. L. Rev 4–68.Google Scholar
DeLand, Michael F. (2012) “Suspending Narrative Engagements The Case of Pick-Up Basketball,” 642 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duneier, Mitch (1999) Sidewalk, 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert (1991) Order without Law. London: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Robert, & Messinger, Sheldon L. (1977) “The Micro-Politics of Trouble,” 25 Social Problems 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Robert (2008) “Responding to Roommate Troubles: Reconsidering Informal Dyadic Control,” 42 Law & Society Rev. 483–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Robert (2010) “From Normal Conflict to Normative Deviance: The Micro-Politics of Trouble in Close Relationships,” 40 J. of Contemporary Ethnography 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1995) “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (1980) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1963) The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max (1955) The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press on behalf of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute, Northern Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Goffman, Alice (2009) “On the Run: Wanted Men in A Philadelphia Ghetto,” 74 American Sociological Rev. 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situations of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1994) “Professional Vision,” 96 American Anthropologist 606–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. (1989) Praying for Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gulliver, Phillip H. (1963) Social Control in an African Society. Boston: Boston Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gulliver, Phillip H. (1973) “Negotiations as a Mode of Dispute Settlement: Towards a General Model,” 7 Law & Society Rev. 667–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliver, Phillip H. (1979) Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hirschauer, Stefan (2005) “On Doing Being a Stranger: The Practical Constitution of Civil Inattention,” 35 J. for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Jacobs, Curtis (2004) “Hard Drugs in a Soft Context: Managing Trouble and Crack Use on a College Campus,” 45 The Sociological Q. 835–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimerson, Jason B. (1996) “Good Times and Good Games: How Pickup Basketball Players Use Wealth-Maximizing Norms,” 25 J. of Contemporary Ethnography 353–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimerson, Jason B. (1999) “Who Has Next? The Symbolic, Rational, and Methodical Use of Norms in Pickup Basketball,” 62 Social Psychology Q. 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (2001) Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jack (1999) How Emotions Work. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, J. C., & Morrison, H. (2009) Gripes: The Little Quarrels of Couples. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kitsuse, John I. (1962) “Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method,” 9 Social Problems 247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jooyoung (2009) “Battlin'on the Corner: Techniques for Sustaining Play,” 56 Social Problems 578–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Eric (2006) “Ethnomethodological Studies of Mediated Interaction and Mundane Expertise,” 54 The Sociological Rev. 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N., & Hoebel, EA (1941) The Cheyenne Way. Norman, OK: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Rev. 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (1978) Law as Process. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, & Metzger, D. (1963) “Conflict Resolution in Two Mexican Communities,” 65 American Anthropologist 584–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura, & Todd, Harry F. (1978) The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia Univ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2000) “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2004) License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Nonet, Phillippe, & Selznick, Philip (1978) Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. (1976) Persons and Masks of the Law. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagis, Michal (2009) “Embodied Self-Reflexivity,” 72 Social Psychology Q. 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perinbanayagam, Robert (2006) Games and Sport in Everyday Life: Dialogues and Narratives of the Self. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Pollner, Melvin (1978) “Constitutive and Mundane Versions of Labeling Theory,” 1 Human Studies 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollner, Melvin (1987) Mundane Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, TR (1993) Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred (1967) Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan (2011) “J. Locke, Op. Cit.: Invocations of Law on Snowy Streets,” 5 J. of Comparative Law 66–91.Google Scholar
Starr, June (1978) Dispute and Settlement in Rural Turkey: An Ethnography of Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudnow, David (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office,” 12 Social Problems 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, Diane (1986) Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loic (1995) “Pugs at Work: Bodily Capital and Bodily Labour among Professional Boxers,” 1 Body & Society 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wästerfors, David (2011) “Disputes and Going Concerns in an Institution for ‘Troublesome’ Boys,” 40 J. of Contemporary Ethnography 39–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1978) “The Atlantic Fishermen,” in Nader, Laura, & Todd, Harry F., eds., The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar