Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:29:51.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Tom Baker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports the results of a qualitative study of personal injury lawyers in Connecticut. Building on the results of an earlier study of lawyers in Florida, “Transforming Punishment Into Compensation: In the Shadow of Punitive Damages” (Baker 1998), the Connecticut study describes and explores the implications of professional norms and practices that govern tort settlement behavior. In particular, it examines the moral and practical barriers to collecting “blood money” (money from individual defendants, as opposed to liability insurance companies), as well as explanations for victims' apparent ability to partially trump the claims of subrogating workers' compensation and health insurance carriers. The results pose a challenge to the conventional understanding that tort law in action is a simpler, more streamlined version of tort law on the books. In addition, the results suggest that compensation and retribution figure far more prominently in tort law in action than does the deterrence emphasized in much of the theoretical and doctrinal literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 275 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thank you to Leslie Levin and Jim Stark for insightful comments and discussion over the course of this research project, and to Kenneth Abraham, Marc Galanter, Kyle Logue, Francis Mootz, Jeremy Paul, and Peter Siegelman for comments on an earlier draft. Thank you to Marianne Sadowski and Jonathan Shapiro for valuable research assistance.

References

References

Abel, Richard (1990) “A Critique of Torts,” 37 UCIA Law. Rev. 785–831.Google Scholar
Abraham, Kenneth S., & Liebman, Lance (1993) “Private Insurance, Social Insurance, and Tort Reform: Toward a New Vision of Compensation for Illness and Injury,” 93 Columbia Law Rev. 75–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. (1997) The Damages Lottery. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom (1997–98) “Liability Insurance Conflicts and Defense Lawyers: From Triangles to Tetrahedrons,” 4 Connecticut Insurance Law J. 101–51.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom (1998) “Transforming Punishment into Compensation: In the Shadow of Punitive Damage,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 211–36.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom, & McElrath, Karen (1996) “Whose Safety Net? Home Insurance and Inequality,” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 229–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, Sissela (1978) Lying : Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bovbjerg, Randall R. (1994) “Liability and Liability Insurance: Chicken and Egg, Destructive Spiral, or Risk and Reaction,” 72 Texas Law Rev. 1655–79.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido (1970) The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules (1992) Risks and Wrongs. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Conard, Alfred F. et al. (1964) Automobile Accident Costs and Payments: Studies in the Economics of Injury Reparation. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., Marks, Stephen & Mnookin, Robert (1982) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior,” 11 J. Legal Studies 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Margaret G. (1997) “ERISA Preemption and Regulation of Managed Health Care: The Case for Managed Federalism,” 23 American J. of Law and Medicine 251–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc, & Luban, David (1993) “Poetic Justice: Punitive Damages and Legal Pluralism,” 42 American Univ. Law Rev. 1393–1463.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. (1981) The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, James A. Jr., & Twerski, Aaron D. (1992) “A Proposed Revision of § 401A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts,” 77 Cornell Law Rev. 1512–57.Google Scholar
Hughes, James W., & Snyder, Edward (1995) “Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence,” 38 J. of Law and Economics 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerry, Robert (1996) Understanding Insurance Law. New York: Bender.Google Scholar
Kessler, Daniel P. (1999) “The Economic Effects of the Liability System,” in Hoover Institution Essays In Public Policy. Palo Alto, California: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1998a) “Contingent Fee Lawyers and Their Clients: Settlement Expectations, Settlement Realities, and Issues of Control in the Lawyer-Client Relationship,” 23 Law & Social Inquiry 795–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1998b) “The Wages of Risk: The Returns of Contingency Fee Legal Practice,” 47 DePaul Law Rev. 267–320.Google Scholar
Larson, Arther, ed. (2001) Larson's Worker's Compensation. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
Low, Stuart, & Smith, Janet Kiholm (1995) “Decisions to Retain Attorneys and File Lawsuits: An Examination of the Comparative Negligence Rule in Accident Law,” 24 J. Legal Studies 535–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmet, Wendy E. (1993) “Regulation and Federalism: Legal Impediments to State Health Care Reform,” 19 Am. J. of Law & Medicine 121–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepper, Stephen L. (1997) “Applying the Fundamentals of Lawyers' Ethics to Insurance Defense Practice,” 4 Connecticut Insurance Law J. 27–74.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R. (1992a) “Comment on Coleman: Corrective Justice,” 67 Indiana Law J. 381–409.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R. (1992b) “The Moral Foundations of Tort Law,” 77 Iowa Law Rev. 449–514.Google Scholar
Pogarsky, Greg, & Babcock, Linda (2001) “Damage Caps, Motivated Anchoring, and Bargaining Impasse,” 30 J. Legal Studies 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1910) “Law in Books and Law in Action,” 44 American Law Rev. 12.Google Scholar
Pryor, Ellen S. (1997) “The Stories We Tell: Intentional Harm and the Quest for Insurance Funding,” 75 Texas Law Rev. 1721–64.Google Scholar
Pryor, Ellen S. (1999) “The Tort Liability Regime and the Duty to Defend,” 58 Maryland Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Ross, H. Laurence (1970) Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael (1992) “Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System—and Why Not?,” 140 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1147–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1995) Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevarino, Angelo P. (1994) Connecticut Workers Compensation After Reform, West Hartford, Connecticut: Atlantic Law Book Co.Google Scholar
Shapo, Marshall S. (2000) Tort and Injury Law. New York: Lexis.Google Scholar
Silver, Charles, & Syverud, Kent (1995) “The Professional Responsibilities of Insurance Defense Lawyers,” 45 Duke Law J. 255–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan & Hsieh, (1995) “Injury, Liability, and the Decision to File a Medical Malpractice Claim,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 413–35.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Jane (1995) “Torts, Insurance, and Ideology,” 58 Modern Law Rev. 820–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, Stephen D. (1993) “Beyond Compensation: Proposals for Reform,” 15 Hawaii Law Rev. 659.Google Scholar
Syverud, Kent D. (1990) “The Duty to Settle,” 76 Virginia Law Rev. 1113–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syverud, Kent D. (1994) “On the Demand for Liability Insurance,” 72 Texas Law Rev. 1629–54.Google Scholar
Wasserton, Richard (1975) “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues,” 5 Human Rights 1–24.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1983) “Toward a Moral Theory of Negligence Law,” 2 J. of Law & Philosophy 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1995) The Idea of Private Law, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Whitford, William (1968) “Strict Products Liability and the Automobile Industry: Much Ado About Nothing,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 83–171.Google Scholar
Widiss, Alan D., & Keeton, Robert E. (1998) Insurance Law: A Guide to Fundamental Principles, Legal Doctrines, and Commercial Practices, St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
Wissler, Roselle L., Rector, Katie A. & Saks, Micheal J. (2001) “The Impact of Jury Instructions and the Fusion of Liability and Compensatory Damages,” 25 Law & Human Behavior 125–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennifer, Wriggins (2001) “Torts, Insurance, and the Problem of Uncompensated Harm from Domestic Violence” (forthcoming in Southern California Law Rev.).Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. (1979) Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. (1985) Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. (1994) The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Alvardo v. Black, 248 Conn. 409 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth v. Caggiano, 605 So.2d 56 (Fl. 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuttings v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293 (7th Cir. 1993).Google Scholar
Entick v. Carrington, 19 How. St. Tr. 1029 (C.P. 1765).Google Scholar
U.S. v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U.S. 43 (1993).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Connecticut General Statutes §§ 31-293(a); 38a-14-112, 38a-334-335, 38a-336a, 52-192a, 52-225a, 52-225b, 52-352(b) (2001).Google Scholar
Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4b..Google Scholar
American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2, 1.4, 2.1..Google Scholar
Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 28(d)..Google Scholar
42 United States Code § 2651 (2001).Google Scholar