Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T09:37:25.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choice, Discrimination, and the Motherhood Penalty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tamar Kricheli-Katz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies have documented substantial penalties associated with motherhood and suggest that discrimination plays an important role in producing them. In this article, I argue that the degree to which motherhood is conceptualized as a choice affects the penalties associated with making this choice. Two methods are employed to evaluate this argument. The first method is an analysis of state differences in the wage penalties for motherhood, in which hierarchical linear modeling is used with data from the 1988–2004 Current Population Survey. The second method is a hiring experiment in a highly controlled setting. The wage analysis shows that, net of the usual individual and state-level factors that affect wages, mothers are penalized more in states where motherhood is perceived to be a woman's choice. The hiring experiment distinguishes between productivity-based and discrimination-based explanations for the penalty and provides strong evidence for a causal relationship between perceptions of choice and discrimination against mothers.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 557 - 587
Copyright
© 2012 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Foundation (dissertation improvement grant number 49010) and the Clayman Institute at Stanford University. I thank Shelley Correll, David Grusky, Cecilia Ridgeway, and Paula Englnad for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Acker, Joan (1990) “Hierarchies, Jobs, and Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations,” 4 Gender & Society 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguero, L. Bloch, & Byrne, D. (1984) “The Relationship among Sexual Beliefs, Attitudes, Experience, and Homophobia,” 10 J. of Homosexuality 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Deborah J., Binder, Melissa, & Krause, Kate (2003) “The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work-Schedule Flexibility,” 56 Industrial and Labor Relations Rev. 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair-Loy, Mary (2003) Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bryk, Anthony S., & Raudenbush, Stephen W. (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Budig, Michelle J., & England, Paula (2001) “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood,” 66 American Sociological Rev. 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, Shelley J., Benard, Stephen, & Paik, In (2007) “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?,” 112 American J. of Sociology 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, Christian S., & Biernat, M. (1990) “The Ideology of Anti-fat Attitudes,” 20 J. of Applied Social Psychology 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, Christian S., & Biernat, M. (1994) “Prejudice Against Fat People: Ideology and Self-interest,” 66 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 882–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crandall, Christian S., & Eshleman, Amy (2003) “A Justification–Suppression Model of the Expression and Experience of Prejudice,” 129 Psychological Bulletin 414–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crocker, Jennifer, Major, Brenda, & Steele, Claude (1998) “Social Stigma,” in Fiske, S., Gilbert, D., & Lindzey, G., eds., Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Dye, Jane L. (2008) Fertility of American Women: 2006. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, et al. (2002) The Shaping of Abortion Discourse and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Glass, Jennifer (2004) “Blessing or Curse?: Work-Family Policies and Mother's Wage Growth Over Time.” 31 Work and Occupations 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1995) “Career and Family: College Women Look to the Past,” Working Paper 5188. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Harkness, Susan, & Waldfogel, Jane (2003) “The Family Gap in Pay: Evidence from Seven Industrialized Countries,” 22 Research in Labor Economics 369–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Sharon (1996) Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (1997). The Time Bind: When Work Become Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999) “Rethinking the Value of Choice: A Cultural Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation,” 76 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolberg, Jon E., ed. (1991) The Welfare State as Employer. London, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Langer, Ellen J., & Rodin, Judith (1976) “The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting,” 34 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Hazel Rose, & Kitayama, Shinobu (2003) “Models of Agency: Sociocultural Diversity in the Construction of Action,” in Murphy-Burman, V., & Berman, J., eds., Cross Cultural Differences in Perspectives on Self. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Markus, Hazel Rose, & Schwartz, Barry (2010) “Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well-Being? 37 J. of Consumer Research 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Hazel Rose, Uchida, Yukiko, Omoregie, Heather, Townsend, Sarah S.M., & Kitayama, Shinobu (2006) “Going for the Gold: Models of Agency in Japanese and American Contexts,” 17 Psychological Science 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, Joya, Budig, Michelle J., & Moller, Stephanie (2007) “Reconciliation Policies and the Effects of Motherhood on Employment, Earnings, and Poverty,” 9 J. of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 135–155.Google Scholar
Mezey, Naomi (2001) “Law as Culture,” 13 Yale J. of Law and Humanities 35–67.Google Scholar
Papanek, Hanna (1994) “The Ideal Woman and the Ideal Society: Control and Autonomy in the Construction of Identity,” in Moghadam, Valentine M., ed., Identity Politics and Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Patall, Erika A., Cooper, Harris, & Robinson, Jorgianne Civey (2008) “The Effects of Choice on Intrinsic Motivation and Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Research Findings,” 134 Psychological Bulletin 270–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridgeway, Cecilia (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., & Correll, Shelley J. (2004) “Motherhood as a Status Characteristic,” 60 J. of Social Issues 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risman, Barbara J. (2004) “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Social Change,” 18 Gender and Society 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Richard M., & Deci, Edward L. (2000) “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,” 55 American Psychologist 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savani, Krishna, Markus, Hazel Rose, & Conner, Alana L. (2008) “Let Your Preference Be Your Guide? Preferences and Choices are More Tightly Linked for North Americans than for Indians,” 95 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 861–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savani, Krishna, Stephens, Nicole M., & Markus, Hazel Rose (2011) “The Unanticipated Interpersonal and Societal Consequences of Choice: Victim-Blaming and Reduced Support for the Public Good,” 22 Psychological Science 795–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, Richard (1976) “Effects of Control and Predictability on the Physical and Psychological Well-Being of the Institutionalized Aged,” 33 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 563–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigle-Rushton, Wendy, & Waldfogel, Jane (2004) “Motherhood and Women's Earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic Countries,” Paper presented at the Conference on Cross-National Expenditures to Children, Princeton University, http://www.lisproject.org/publications/liswps/454.pdf (accessed 4 Feb. 2010).Google Scholar
Stephens, Nicole M., Hamedani, MarYam G., Markus, Hazel Rose, Bergsieker, Hilary B., & Eloul, Liyam (2009) “Why Did They “Choose” to Stay? Perspectives of Hurricane Katrina Observers and Survivors,” 20 Psychological Science 878–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, Nicole, & Levine, Cynthia Steel (2011) “Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality,” 22 Psychological Science 1231–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldfogel, Jane (1997a) “The Effect of Children on Women's Wages,” 62 American Sociological Rev. 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldfogel, Jane (1997b) “Understanding the “Family Gap” in Pay for Women with Children,” 12 J. of Economic Perspectives 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Bernard (1995) Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Weiner, Bernard, Perry, Raymond P., & Magnusson, Jamie (1988) “An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Stigma,” 55 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Bernard E. (1990) “The Relationship of Heterosexuals’ Attributions for the Causes of Homosexuality to Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men,” 16 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Joan E. (1991) “Gender Wars: Selfless Women in the Republic of Choice,” 66 New York Univ. Law Rev. 1559, 1567–1568.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, Joan E. (2000) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Yoshino, Kenji (2006) Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar