Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:34:45.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. By Charles Foster. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2009. 189 pp. $45.00 paper.

Review products

Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. By Charles Foster. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2009. 189 pp. $45.00 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Katharina Heyer
Katharina Heyer*
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Manoa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 227 - 230
Copyright
© 2011 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Channick, Susan Adler (1999) “The Myth of Autonomy at the End-of-Life: Questioning the Paradigm of Rights,” 44 Villanova Law Rev. 577–641.Google Scholar
Finer, Lawrence B., et al. (2005) “Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives,” 37 Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 110–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilligan, Carol (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrage, Laurie (2003) Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar