Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:13:06.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Citizen Interviews, Organizational Feedback, and Police-Community Relations Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

David J. Bordua
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Larry L. Tifft
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago Circle

Extract

Police-community relations programs are intended to be long-range, full-scale efforts to acquaint the police and the community with each other's problems and to stimulate action aimed at solving problems; they have been criticized, however, as being concerned mainly with raising the professional image of the police in the minds of the public (President's Commission, 1967a: 100). In some ways, they seem to have functioned to slow down change and to maintain present police policies and practices.

The President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967b: 178) has indicated that some of these policies and practices cannot be justified. The National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968: 158) comments that some activities of even the most “professional” police departments may heighten tension and enhance the potential for civil disorder.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by the Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

AUTHORS' NOTE: The authors would like to thank Professors Eugene Eidenberg and Kenneth Southwood for critical comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The data reported here are from a larger study of lower-level police supervision begun in 1967. Research support was provided under the Law Enforcement Assistance Act of 1965 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Law Enforcement Assistance Grant No. 385-(266)-(S-215).

References

BAYLEY, David H. and Harold, MENDELSOHN (1969) Minorities and the Police. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
BIDERMAN, A. D., JOHNSON, L. A., McINTYRE, J. and A. W., WEIR (1967) Report on a Pilot Study in the District of Columbia on Victimization and Attitudes toward Law Enforcement. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Surveys No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
BORDUA, David J. (1968) “Comments on Police-Community Relations,” in Cohn, S. I. (ed.) Law Enforcement Science and Technology II. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute.Google Scholar
GERMANN, A. C. (1968) “The Problem of Police-Community Relations.” Paper prepared for the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Patrick V. (1969) “Reflections on Changing Law Enforcement Problems,” 33 Federal Probation 10.Google Scholar
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968) Report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. [Kerner Commission].Google Scholar
National Center on Police and Community Relations (1967) A National Survey of Police and Community Relations. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Surveys V. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967a) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967b) Task Force Report: The Police. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, R. (1969) “The Police and the Community.” Unpublished paper by the President of the Afro-American Patrolmen's League, Chicago.Google Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr. (1967) “Public Perceptions and Recollections about Crime, Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice,” in President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Surveys III: Studies in Crime and Law Enforcement in Major Metropolitan Areas, Vol. I, Sec. 3. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
TIFFT, Larry L. (1968) “Lower Level Police Supervision: A Perspective and Some Early Findings.” Paper read at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association in Boston.Google Scholar
TIFFT, Larry L. and David J., BORDUA (1969) “Police Organization and Future Research,” 6 Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar