No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
Stephen Daniels' essay examines the series of studies of state supreme courts by Bliss Cartwright, Lawrence M. Friedman, Robert A. Kagan, and Stanton Wheeler, studies that report the results of what I will call the State Supreme Court Project. In this comment, I will not focus on the critique that Daniels makes of these studies; rather, I will consider a broader set of issues that his essay and the articles that he discusses raised for me.
- Type
- Article Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1988 The Law and Society Association.
References
DANIELS, Stephen (1985) “Continuity and Change in Patterns of Case Handling: A Case Study of Two Rural Counties,” 19 Law & Society Review 381.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., Robert A., KAGAN, Bliss, CARTWRIGHT, and Stanton, WHEELER (1981) “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation,” 33 Stanford Law Review 773.Google Scholar
HOWARD, J. Woodford (1981) Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A., Bliss, CARTWRIGHT, Lawrence M., FRIEDMAN, and Stanton, WHEELER (1977) “The Business of State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 30 Stanford Law Review 121.Google Scholar
MC INTOSH, Wayne (1983) “Private Use of a Public Forum: A Long Range View of the Dispute Processing Role of Courts,” 77 American Political Science Review 991.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank W. Jr. (1986) “Commercial Litigation in West Virginia State and Federal Courts 1870–1940,” 30 American Journal of Legal History 322.Google Scholar
WHEELER, Stanton, Bliss, CARTWRIGHT, Kagan, Robert A., and Lawrence M., FRIEDMAN (1987) “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 21 Law & Society Review 403.Google Scholar