Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T11:12:54.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Simon and Lynch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Keebet Von Benda-Beckmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , 1989 , pp. 849 - 854
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AALDERS, M. V. C. (1984) Industrie, Milieu en Wetgeving. Amsterdam: Kobra.Google Scholar
ABEL, R. (ed.) (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
ANJOU, L. J. M., d' (1986) Actoren en Factoren in het Wetgevingsproces. Deventer: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
BENDA-BECKMANN, K. von, and A. J., HOEKEMA (eds.) (1987) Horizontaal Bestuur. The Hague: Vuga. Also as special issue of Recht der Werkelijkheid 1987:2.Google Scholar
BLACK, D. (ed.) (1984) Toward a General Theory of Social Control Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CAPPELLETTI, M. (ed.) (1978/79) Access to Justice. Noordholland: Alphen and Rijn.Google Scholar
GALANTER, M. (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering and Indigenous Law,” 19 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1.Google Scholar
GALANTER, M. (1974) “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Social Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
HESSING, D. J., H., ELFFERS, R. H., WEIGEL, and K. A., KINSEY (1988) “Tax Evasion Research: Measurement Strategies and Theoretical Models,” in van Raaij, W. F., Wärmeryd, K. E., and van Veldhoven, G. M. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
JO WELL, J. L. (1975) Law and Bureaucracy: Administrative Discretion and the Limits of Legal Action. New York: Dunellen Pub. Co.Google Scholar
KAGAN, R. A. (1978) Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
KNEGT, R. (1986) Regels en Redelijkheid en de Bijstandsverlening: Participerende Observatie bij een Sociale Dienst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
KONING, P. de (1988) “Bureaucrat-Client Interaction: Normative Pluralism in the Implementation of Social Security Disability Laws,” in von Benda-Beckmann, F. et al. (eds.), Between Kinship and the State: Social Security and Law in Developing Countries. Dordrechts: Foris.Google Scholar
LIPSKY, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, N. (1986) “The Self-Production of Law and Its Limits.” In: G. Teubner (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUHMANN, N. (1985) “Einige Probleme mit reflexivem Recht.” 6 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 6: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUHMANN, N. (1975) Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACAULAY, S. (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study, 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MOORE, S. F. (1978) Law as Process. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
NADER, L. (ed.) (1980) No Access to Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
OFFE, C. (1973) Strukturprobleme des Kapitalistischen Staats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
OFFE, C. (1982) University of Amsterdam/Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
SIMITIS, S. (1985) “Zur Verrechtlichung der Arbeitsbeziehungen,” in Kubier, F. (ed.), Verrechtlichung von Wirtschaft, Arbeit und sozialer Solidarität: Vergleichende Analysen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, G., and H., WILLKE (1984) “Kontext and Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht,” 1 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 4.Google Scholar
TREIBER, H. (1983) “Regulative Politik in der Krise? Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen Thema oder Reflexive Rationalität im Schatten des gesatzten Rechts,” 1983 Kriminalsoziologische Bibliogaphie 28.Google Scholar
TREIBER, H. (1973) Widerstand gegen Reformpolitik. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
UNGER, R. M. (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
VOIGT, R. (ed.) (1983a) Gegentendenzen zur Verrechtlichung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOIGT, R. (1983b) Abschied vom Recht? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
WASSENBERG, A. F. P. (1982), ”Neo-Corporatism and the Quest for Control: The Cuckoo Game,” in Lehmbruch, G. and G. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar