Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T03:32:51.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dilemma of Clients' Rights in Social Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Jack Tweedie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Courts and legislatures often grant rights to clients of social programs so that the clients can protect their own interests in the programs. Previous research has questioned whether rights provide effective protections for clients' interests. In this study, I examine parental rights of school choice in Britain, showing that rights can provide effective protections for clients' interests under some conditions. However, this study also reveals the dilemma of rights: rights that are effective in protecting individual client interests can also undermine a social program's ability to serve the collective interests of all clients.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , 1989 , pp. 175 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on work that I did with Michael Adler and Alison Petch at Edinburgh University for a project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain. I would like to thank Susan Sterett, Shari Diamond, David Chase, and Saundra Johnsen for their help in writing this article.

References

References

ADLER, Michael, Allison, PETCH, and Jack, TWEEDIE (1989) Parental Choice and Education Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
ADLER, Michael, and Gillian, RAAB (1988) “Exit, Choice, and Loyalty: The Impact of Parental Choice on Admissions to Secondary Schools in Edinburgh and Dundee,” 3 Journal of Education Policy 155.Google Scholar
ATHERTON, Graham (1980) Reaching Out to Parents. Glasgow: Scottish Consumer Council.Google Scholar
BARTLETT, Katherine T. (1985) “The Role of Cost in Educational Decisionmaking for the Handicapped Child,” 48 Law and Contemporary Problems 7.Google Scholar
BAUM, Daniel J. (1974) The Welfare Family and Mass Administrative Justice. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
BELL, Kathleen (1975) Research Study on Supplementary Benefit Appeal Tribunals. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
BLAU, Peter (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
BRAYBROOKE, David, and Charles E., LINDBLOM (1963) A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
BRIAULT, Eric, and Frances, SMITH (1980) Falling Rolls in Secondary Schools. Windsor, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
BROWN, R.G.S. (1975) The Management of Welfare. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
BRUINSMA, Freek (1980) “The (Non-) Assertion of Welfare Rights: Hirschman's Theory Applied,” 15 Acta Politica 357.Google Scholar
BUCK, Trevor (1985) “Schools Admission Appeals,” 1985 Journal of Social Welfare Law 227.Google Scholar
BUDOFF, Milton, Alan, ORENSTEIN, and Carol, KERVICK (1982) Due Process in Special Education. Cambridge, MA: Ware Press.Google Scholar
BULL, David (1985) “Monitoring Education Appeals: Local Ombudsmen Lead the Way,” 1985 Journal of Social Welfare Law 189.Google Scholar
BULL, David (1980) “School Admissions: A New Appeals Procedure,” 1980 Journal of Social Welfare Law 209.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E., Jan, HOWARD, and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1966) “Civil Justice and the Poor: Issues for Sociological Research,” 1 Law & Society Review 9.Google Scholar
CLUNE, William, and VAN PELT, Mark H. (1985) “A Political Method of Evaluating the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Several Gaps of Gap Analysis,” 48 Law and Contemporary Problems 7.Google Scholar
COFER, Donna P. (1985) Judges, Bureaucrats and the Question of Independence: A Study of the Social Security Administration Hearing Process. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
CRANSTON, Ross (1985) Legal Foundations of the Welfare State. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
DENNISON, W. F. (1981) Education in Jeopardy: Problems and Possibilities of Contraction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
DENVIR, John (1975) “Controlling Welfare Bureaucracy: A Dynamic Approach,” 50 Notre Dame Lawyer 731.Google Scholar
DONNISON, David (1982) The Politics of Poverty. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
FOSTER, Peggy (1983) Access to Welfare: An Introduction to Welfare Rationing. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRIENDLY, Henry J. (1975) “Some Kind of Hearing,” 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1267.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon L. (1978) “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” 92 Harvard Law Review 353.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GARTNER, Alan, and Dorothy K., LIPSKY (1987) “Beyond Special Education: Toward a Quality System for All Students,” 57 Harvard Educational Review 367.Google Scholar
GOODIN, Robert B.. (1986) “Welfare, Rights, and Discretion,” 6 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 232.Google Scholar
HAMMER, Ronald P., and Joseph M., HARTLEY (1978) “Procedural Due Process and the Welfare Recipient: A Statistical Study of AFDC Far Hearings in Wisconsin,” 1978 Wisconsin Law Review 145.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel F. (1986) The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel F. (1979) Protecting the Social Service Client: Legal and Structural Controls on Official Discretion. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel F. (1973) The Coercive Social Worker. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel F. (1969) “Justice for the Welfare Recipient: Fair Hearings in AFDC—The Wisconsin Experience,” 43 Social Service Review 12.Google Scholar
HARVARD LAW REVIEW (1979) “Enforcing the Right to an ”Appropriate “Education: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975,” 92 Harvard Law Review 1103.Google Scholar
HILL, Michael (1974) “Some Legal Implications of Legal Approaches to Welfare Rights,” 4 British Journal of Social Work 187.Google Scholar
HILL, Michael, and Glen, BRAMLEY (1986) Analysing Social Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
HOWE, David (1986) Social Workers and Their Practice in Welfare Bureaucracies. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar
JONES, Harry W. (1958) “The Rule of Law and the Welfare State,” 58 Columbia Law Review 143.Google Scholar
JOWELL, Jeffrey (1975) Law and Bureaucracy: Administrative Discretion and the Limits of Legal Action. New York: Dunellen.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A. (1978) Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
KIRP, David L. (1976) “Proceduralism and Bureaucracy: Due Process in the School Setting,” 28 Stanford Law Review 841.Google Scholar
KIRST, M., and K., BERTKEN (1983) “Due Process Hearings in Special Education: Some Early Findings from California,” in Chambers, J. and Hartman, W. (eds.), Special Education Policies: Their History, Implementation, and Finance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
KURILOFF, Peter, David, KIRP, and William, BUSS (1979) When Handicapped Children Go to Court: Assessing the Impact of the Legal Reform of Special Education in Pennsylvania. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
LEWIS, Norman, and Rowland, LIVOCK (1979) “Council House Allocation Procedures: Some Problems of Discretion and Control,” 2 Urban Law and Policy 133.Google Scholar
LIPSKY, Michael (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
LISTER, Ruth (1974) Justice for the Claimant: A Study of Supplementary Benefit Appeal Tribunals. London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
MACBETH, Alastair, David, STRACHAN, and Cathlin, MACAULAY (1986) Parental Choice of School in Scotland. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
MACFAYDEN, Ian, and McMILLAN, Fiona (1984) The Management of Change at a Time of Falling School Rolls. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.Google Scholar
MARCH, James G., and Herbert, SIMON (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
MASHAW, Jerry L. (1983) Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MASHAW, Jerry L. (1974) “The Management Side of Due Process: Some Theoretical and Litigation Notes on the Assurance of Accuracy, Fairness, and Timeliness in the Adjudication of Social Welfare Claims,” 59 Cornell Law Review 772.Google Scholar
MASHAW, Jerry L. (1971) “Welfare Reform and Local Administration of Aid to Families with Dependent Children in Virginia,” 57 Virginia Law Review 818.Google Scholar
MATZA, David (1964) Delinquency and Drift. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
MEREDITH, Paul (1981) “Executive Discretion and Choice of Secondary School,” 1981 Public Law 52.Google Scholar
NEAL, David, and David L., KIRP (1985) “The Allure of Legalization Reconsidered: The Case of Special Education,” 48 Law and Contemporary Problems 63.Google Scholar
NONET, Philippe (1969) Administrative Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
O'NEIL, Robert M. (1970) “Of Justice Delayed and Justice Denied: The Welfare Prior Hearing Cases,” 1970 Supreme Court Review 161.Google Scholar
PIVEN, Frances F., and Richard A., CLOWARD (1971) Regulating the Poor. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
PROSSER, Tony (1977) “Poverty, Ideology, and Legality: Supplementary Benefit Appeal Tribunals and Their Predecessors,” 4 British Journal of Law and Society 39.Google Scholar
PROTTAS, Jeffrey (1979) People-Processing: The Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
REICH, Charles A. (1965) “Individual Rights and Social Welfare: The Emerging Legal Issues,” 74 Yale Law Journal 1245.Google Scholar
REICH, Charles A. (1964) “The ‘New’ Property,” 73 Yale Law Journal 733.Google Scholar
SCHEINGOLD, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SCHUCK, Peter H. (1979) “The Graying of Civil Rights Law: The Age Discrimination Act of 1975,” 89 Yale Law Journal 27.Google Scholar
SELZNICK, Philip, with Philippe, NONET and Howard, VOLLMER (1969) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
SIMON, William H. (1985) “The Invention and Reinvention of Welfare Rights,” 44 Maryland Law Review 1.Google Scholar
SIMON, William H. (1983) “Legality, Bureaucracy, and Class in the Welfare System,” 92 Yale Law Journal 1198.Google Scholar
SOSIN, Michael (1986) “Legal Rights and Welfare Change: 1960–1980,” in Danziger, and Weinberg, (eds.), Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn't. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
STILLMAN, Andy, and Karen, MAYCHELL (1986) Choosing Schools: Parents, LEAs and the 1980 Education Act. Windsor, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
TITMUSS, Richard (1971) “Welfare ‘Rights,‘ Law and Discretion,” 42 Political Quarterly 113.Google Scholar
TRIBE, Laurence H. (1975) “Structural Due Process,” 10 Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 269.Google Scholar
TWEEDIE, Jack (in press) “Discretion to Use Rules: Individual Interests and Collective Welfare in School Admissions,” Law and Policy.Google Scholar
TWEEDIE, Jack (1986) “Rights in Social Programmes: The Case of Parental Choice of School,” 1986 Public Law 407.Google Scholar
TWEEDIE, Jack (1983) “The Politics of Legalization in Special Education Reform,” in Chambers, J. and Hartmann, W. (eds.), Special Education Policies: Their History, Implementation, and Finance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
WEATHERLEY, Richard (1979) Reforming Special Education: Policy Implementation from State Level to Street Level. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
YSSELDYKE, James, Bob, ALGOZZINE, and Susan, EPPS (1983) “A Logical and Empirical Analysis of Current Practice in Classifying Students as Handicapped,” 50 Exceptional Children 160.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

United States..Google Scholar
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Kingdom..Google Scholar
R. v. South Glamorgan Appeal Committee, ex parte Daffyd Evans, May 10, 1984 (unreported).Google Scholar
Watt v. Kesteven County Council [1955] 1 Q.B. 408.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

United States..Google Scholar
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 89 Stat. 773 (1975), 20 U.S.C. § 1400–1461 (1982).Google Scholar
Social Security Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 620 (1935), 42 U.S.C. § 602.Google Scholar
United Kingdom..Google Scholar
Education Act 1980, c. 20.Google Scholar
Education (Scotland) Act 1981, c. 58.Google Scholar
Education Reform Act 1988, c. 40.Google Scholar
Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977, c. 48.Google Scholar