Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:18:40.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expectations and Images: A Note on Diffuse Support for Legal Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Richard L. Engstrom  and
Micheal W. Giles
Richard L. Engstrom
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University in New Orleans
Micheal W. Giles
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has recently been a growing concern within political science with the public's support for governmental institutions. To date, the research in the judicial realm — focusing extensively on the United States Supreme Court — has measured support primarily in terms of the public's evaluation of court outputs and has attempted to explain support through variables believed to function as important bases or references for these evaluations, e.g., policy orientations, political party identification, and race (Murphy and Tanenhaus, 1968a and 1968b; Dolbeare and Hammond, 1968; Dolbeare, 1967; Hirsh and Donohew, 1968). Yet the public is not especially cognizant of court decisions and the low “visibility” of judicial bodies (Dolbeare, 1967; 198-201; Barth, 1968; Jacob, 1966) would suggest that the basis of support might well be more diffuse than specific. An analysis of diffuse support might be concerned primarily with the public's general willingness to comply with judicial decrees or with its willingness to maintain judicial institutions as bodies appropriate for resolving conflicts, and only secondarily with outputs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , May 1972 , pp. 631 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BOYNTON, G. R., PATTERSON, Samuel C., and Ronald D., HEDLUND (1968) “The Structure of Public Support for Legislative Institutions,” 12 Midwest Journal of Political Science 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HIRSH, Herbert, and Lewis, DONOHEW (1968) “A Note on Negro-White Differences in Attitudes toward the Supreme Court,” 49 Social Science Quarterly 557.Google Scholar
ADELSON, Joseph, and Lynette, BEALL (1970) “Adolescent Perspectives on Law and Government,” 4 Law and Society Review 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARTH, Thomas (1968) “Perception and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions at the State and Local Level,” 17 Journal of Public Law 308.Google Scholar
DOLBEARE Kenneth, M. (1967) “The Public Views the Supreme Court,” in Jacob, Herbert (ed.) Law, Politics and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
DOLBEARE Kenneth, M. and Phillip E., HAMMOND (1968) “The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, Robert D., and Judith V., TORNEY (1967) The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1966) “Judicial Insulation — Elections, Direct Participation, and Public Attention to the Courts in Wisconsin,” 1966 Wisconsin Law Review 801.Google Scholar
KOEPPEN, Sheilah R. (1970) “Children and Compliance: A Comparative Analysis of Socialization Studies,” 4 Law and Society Review 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MASON, Alpheus T. (1962) “Myth and Reality in Supreme Court Decisions,” 48 Virginia Law Review 1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MASON, Gene L. (1967) Judges and Their Publics: Role Perceptions and Role Expectations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
MILLER, Arthur S. (1965) “Some Pervasive Myths About the U.S. Supreme Court,” 10 St. Louis Law Review 153.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. and Jozeph, TANENHAUS (1968a) “Public Opinion and Supreme Court: The Goldwater Campaign,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. and Jozeph, TANENHAUS (1968b) “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes,” 2 Law and Society Review 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATTERSON, Samuel C., G. R., BOYNTON, and Ronald D., HEDLUND (1969) “Perceptions and Expectations of the Legislature and Support for It,” 72 American Journal of Sociology 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar