Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T01:38:27.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Jonathan Simon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last century there has been significant growth within our society of practices that distribute costs and benefits to individuals based on statistical knowledge about the population. These actuarial practices like insurance premium setting and standardized testing in educational admissions are successful largely because they allow power to be exercised more effectively and at lower political cost. At the same time they generate ideological effects which have the potential to transform the way individuals understand themselves and their groups. In a 1977 case, Los Angeles Water and Power v. Manhart (435 U.S. 702), the United States Supreme Court considered a challenge to the actuarial use of gender in setting employee benefits. The case and the debates it generated illuminate the danger posed by the ideological effects of actuarial practices to our political culture in general, and to traditionally disempowered classes such as women in particular. At the same time it illustrates the limitation of traditional legal rights discourse as a means of resisting these dangers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 22 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Law and Ideology , 1988 , pp. 771 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank the members of the Amherst Seminar on Legal Ideology and Legal Process for their helpful substantive and editorial comments on my paper. Patricia Ewick and Susan Silbey were particularly instrumental in drawing some coherence out of my original draft. The ideas presented here have been developed through conversations with many friends and teachers including: Marianne Constable, Francois Ewald, Sheldon Messinger, Robert Post, Paul Rabinow, and Kim Schepple. I owe a special debt to Susan Lehman who forced me to refine my ideas and contributed some of her own.

References

References

ALTHUSSER, Louis (1971) Lenin and Philosophy. London, New Left Books.Google Scholar
ATLAS, James (1984) “Beyond Demographics,” The Atlantic (October).Google Scholar
AUSTIN, Regina (1983) “The Insurance Classification Controversy,” 131 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 517.Google Scholar
BENSTON, George J. (1982) “The Economics of Gender Discrimination in Employee Fringe Benefits: Manhart Revisited,” 49 University of Chicago Law Review 489.Google Scholar
BENSTON, George J. (1983) “Discrimination and Efficiency in Employee Fringe Benefits: A Clarification of Issues and a Response to Professors Brilmayer, Laycock, and Sullivan,” 50 University of Chicago Law Review 250.Google Scholar
BRIGHAM, John (1987) The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple Universitv Press.Google Scholar
BRILMAYER, Lea, HEKELER, Richard W., LAYCOCK, Douglas, and Teresa, SULLIVAN (1980) “Sex Discrimination in Employer Sponsored Insurance Plans: A Legal and Demographic Analysis,” 47 University of Chicago Law Review 505.Google Scholar
BRILMAYER, Lea, Douglas, LAYCOCK, and Teresa, SULLIVAN (1983) “The Efficient Use of Group Averages as Nondiscrimination: A Rejoinder to Professor Benston,” 50 University of Chicago Law Review 222.Google Scholar
BRUCE, A., HARNO, A., BURGESS, E., and J., LANDESCO ([1928] 1968) The Workings of the Indeterminate Sentence Law and Parole System in Illinois. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.Google Scholar
CHEVALIER, Louis ([1958, 1973] 1981) Laboring Classes and Dangerous Classes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment, and Classification. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
DELLILO, Don (1985) White Noise. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Emile (1961) Moral Education. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, Steven (1987) “Gay Politics, Ethnic Identity: The Limits of Social Constructionism,” Socialist Review (May-August) 1987).Google Scholar
EWALD, Francois (1986) L'etat providence. Paris, Grasset.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michel (1965) Madness and Civilization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michel (1977) Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon).Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michel (1978) The History of Sexuality Vol. I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michel (1985) The Uses of Pleasure. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
FRUG, Gerald E. (1980) “The City as a Legal Concept,” 93 Harvard Law Review 105.Google Scholar
GARLAND, David (1985) Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar
GRAMSCI, Antonio (1971) The Prison Notebooks, eds. and trans. Haare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell, New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
GREENWOOD, Peter, and Alan, ABRAHAMSE, (1982) Selective Incapacitation. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, Jurgen (1971) Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann Books.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, Jurgen (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
HABERMAS, Jurgen (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2 of Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
HACKING, Ian (1986) “Making Up People,” in Heller, T., Sosna, M., and Wellberry, D. (eds.), Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
HARTSOCK, Nancy (1988) “Rethinking Modernism: Minority v. Majority Theories,” 7 Cultural Critique 187.Google Scholar
HEIDEGGER, Martin (1962) Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. (1977) The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KAPLAN, Temma (1982) “Female Consciousness and Collective Action: The Case of Barcelona 1910-1918,” in Keohane, N., Rosaldo, R., and Gelpi, R. (eds.), Feminist Theory: A Critique of Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, Duncan (1976) “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1685.Google Scholar
KIMBALL, Spencer L. (1979) “Reverse Sex Discrimination: Manhart,” 1979 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 83.Google Scholar
KIMBALL, Spencer L. (1980) “Reprise on Manhart,” 1980 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 915.Google Scholar
LAYCOCK, Douglas, and Teresa A., SULLIVAN (1981) “Sex Discrimination as ‘Actuarial Equality’: A Rejoinder to Kimball,” 1981 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 221.Google Scholar
MARX, Karl (1970) Capital, Vol. I: London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
MAUSS, Marcel (1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. Cunnison, Ian. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
MEEHL, Paul E. (1954) Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
MINOW, Martha (1987) “Forward: Justice Engendered,” 101 Harvard Law Review 9.Google Scholar
NIETZSCHE, Frederick (1967) On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
RHODE, Deborah L. (1982) “Class Conflicts in Class Actions,” 34 Stanford Law Review 1183.Google Scholar
ROTHMAN, David (1971) The Discovery of the Asylum. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
RUTHERGLEN, George (1979) “Sexual Equality in Fringe Benefit Plans,” 65 Virginia Law Review 199.Google Scholar
SIMON, Jonathan (1987) “The Emergence of a Risk Society: Law Insurance and the State,” Socialist Review (Sept.-Oct.) 1987).Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto M. (1975) Knowledge and Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1948a) “The Meaning of Discipline,” in Gerth, H. and Mills, C. (eds.), From Max Weber. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1948b) “Politics as a Vocation,” in Gerth, H. and Mills, C. (eds.), From Max Weber. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1968) Economy and Society. New York: Bedminister Press.Google Scholar
WEEKS, Jeffrey (1977) Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the 19th Century. London: Quartet Books.Google Scholar
WORTHAM, Leah (1985) “Insurance Classification: Too Important to be Left to Actuaries,” 19 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform and Legislation 349.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978).Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).Google Scholar
Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 440, 458-459 (1982).Google Scholar
United Steel Workers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979).Google Scholar
Mathews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974).Google Scholar
General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976).Google Scholar