Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T01:31:05.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Incapacitative Effect of Imprisonment: Some Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

David F. Greenberg
David F. Greenberg*
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent research on the functions of imprisonment has begun to provide quantitative, empirical knowledge of its rehabilitative and deterrent effects. Much less is known, however, about the incapacitative effect of imprisonment. While it has long been understood that the physical segregation of prison inmates prevents them from engaging in some criminal activity (as well as much non-criminal activity) during the period of their confinement, quantitative estimates of the size of this effect have been lacking. Leaving aside all deterrent or rehabilitative and counter-rehabilitative effects, it is of some interest to know whether the incapacitative function of imprisonment is large or small.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , Summer 1975 , pp. 541 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper, “Parole Recidivism and the Incapacitative Effects of Imprisonment,” was presented at the 1974 meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems. I am grateful to Dorothy R. Jaman for information on homicide rates in the California prison system, to Stevens H. Clarke and Robert Martinson for comments on the earlier version of the paper, and to James O. Robison for encouragement and general assistance. Part of this research was funded by grants from the Field Foundation and New World Foundation.

References

BABST, D.V., and J.W., MANNERING (1965) “Probation versus Imprisonment for Similar Types of Offenders—a Comparison by Subsequent Violations,” 2 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 60.Google Scholar
BERECOCHEA, John E., Dorothy R., JAMAN, and Welton A., JONES (1973) Time Served in Prison and Parole Outcome: An Experimental Study. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections Research Division.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred and Richard, LARSON (1969) “Models of a Total Criminal Justice System,” 17 Operations Research 199.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred (1972) “Problems in Modeling and Measuring Recidivism,” 8 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 124.Google Scholar
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, NATIONAL COUNCIL ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY (1973) “The Nondangerous Offender Should Not be Imprisoned,” 19 Crime and Delinquency 449.Google Scholar
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL STATISTICS, Crime and Delinquency in California, 1970. Sacramento: California Department of Justice.Google Scholar
CARNEY, Francis J. (1967) “Predicting Recidivism in a Medium Security Correctional Institution,” 58 Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 338.Google Scholar
CHRISTENSON, Ronald (1967) “Projected Percentage of U.S. Population with Criminal Arrest and Conviction Records,” in President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Task Force Report: Science and Technology. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
CLARK, Ramsey (1970) Crime in America. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
CLARK, Ramsey and David, RUDENSTINE (1975) Prison Without Walls: Report on New York Parole. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
CLARKE, Stevens H. (1974) “Getting 'Em Out of Circulation: Does Incarceration of Juvenile Offenders Reduce Crime?” 65 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 528.Google Scholar
COMMISSION OF CORRECTIONS (1965) Thirty-Eighth Annual Report for the Year 1964. Ossining: State of New York.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1970) 1969 Criminal Statistics. State of Michigan.Google Scholar
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS (1971) Offenders Admitted to Adult Correctional Institutions Calendar 1970. Madison: Wisconsin Bureau of Planning, Development and Research.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Isaac (1973) “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation,” 81 Journal of Political Economy 521.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1966) Uniform Crime Reports-1965. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1968) Uniform Crime Reports-1967. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1969) Uniform Crime Reports-1968. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1971) Uniform Crime Reports-1970. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1972) Uniform Crime Reports-1971. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (1973) Uniform Crime Reports-1972. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (n.d.) State Prisoners: Admissions and Releases, 1970. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (1974) Statistical Reports Fiscal Year 1973. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
FOOTE, Caleb (1970) “Comments on Preventive Detention,” 23 Journal of Legal Studies 48.Google Scholar
GOLDFARB, Ronald and Linda, SINGER (1973) After Conviction. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
GOVERNOR'S SELECT COMMITTEE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS (1973) Controlling Crime in California. Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David F. (1974a) “Much Ado About Little: The Correctional Effects of Corrections,” Unpublished paper prepared for the Committee for the Study of Incarceration.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David F. (1974b) “Involuntary Psychiatric Commitments to Prevent Suicide,” 49 N.Y.U. Law Review 227.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David F. (1975) “Theft, Rationality, and the Methodology of Deterrence Research,” to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
HAMMOND, W.H. (1969) The Sentence of the Court. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
HOLT, Norman (1974) “Rational Risk-Taking: Some Alternatives to Traditional Correctional Programs,” Paper presented to the American Correctional Association Conference on Parole-Corrections Project, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
IRWIN, John (1970) The Felon. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
KASSEBAUM, Gene, David A., WARD, and Daniel M., WILNER (1971) Prison Treatment and Parole Survival. New York: John Wiley and Sons,.Google Scholar
KOLODNEY, Steve E., Paul L., PATTERSON, Douglas, DAETZ, and Robert L., MARX (1970) “A Study of the Characteristics and Recidivism Experience of California Prisoners,” in Parole Board Reform in California, Report of the Select Committee on the Administration of Justice. Sacramento: Assembly of the State of California.Google Scholar
LAMB, H.R. and V., GOERTZEL (1974) “Ellsworth House: A Community Alternative,” 131 American Journal of Psychiatry 64.Google Scholar
LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION (1974a) Crime in the Nation's Five Largest Cities. National Crime Panel Surveys of Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, New York, and Philadelphia. Advance Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION (1974b) Crime in Eight American Cities. National Crime Panel Surveys of Atlanta, Baltimore, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Newark, Portland, and St. Louis. Advance Report. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
LIPTON, Douglas, Robert, MARTINSON, and Judith, WILKS (1975) The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatments. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
MARTINSON, Robert (1974a) “What Works?—Questions and Answers about Prison Reform,” 35 The Public Interest 22.Google Scholar
MARTINSON, Robert (1974b) “On Incapacitation—Physical Restraint in Crime Control,” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
MITFORD, Jessica (1973) Kind and Usual Punishment. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
NATIONAL PROBATION AND PAROLE INSTITUTES (1972) Uniform Parole Reports Newsletter. Davis: National Council on Crime and Delinquency (November).Google Scholar
NATIONAL PROBATION AND PAROLE INSTITUTES (1973) Uniform Parole Reports Newsletter. Davis: National Council on Crime and Delinquency (February).Google Scholar
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (1967) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
RESEARCH DIVISION (1968) California Prisoners 1964-6. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
RESEARCH DIVISION (1971a) “Parole Outcome of Felon Releases to California Parole in 1968-1970.” Unpublished document of the California Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
RESEARCH DIVISION (1971b) “Parole Outcome of Felon Releases to California Parole 1962-1969 by Parole Office of Release,” Unpublished document of the California Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
RESEARCH DIVISION (1973) “Number of Persons Fatally Injured Due to Assaultive Incidents,” Unpublished document of the California Department of Corrections (March 21).Google Scholar
SCHUR, Edwin M. (1971) Labeling Deviant Behavior. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
SHOHAM, Shlomo (1966) Crime and Social Deviance. Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
SILVER, Morris (1974) “Punishment, Deterrence and Police Effectiveness: A Survey and Critical Interpretation of the Recent Econometric Literature,” unpublished paper.Google Scholar
SPACE-GENERAL CORPORATION (1965) Prevention and Control of Crime and Delinquency, Final Report. El Monte, California: Space-General Corporation.Google Scholar
STUDT, Eliot (1973) Surveillance and Service in Parole. Washington D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.Google Scholar
TAKAGI, Paul (1967) Evaluation Systems and Adaptations in a Formal Organization. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
TULLOCK, Gordon (1974) “Does Punishment Deter Crime?” 36 The Public Interest.Google Scholar
VON HIRSCH, Andrew (1972) “Prediction of Criminal Conduct and Preventive Confinement of Convicted Persons,” 21 Buffalo Law Review 717.Google Scholar
WENK, Ernst A. and Robert L., EMRICH (1972) “Assaultive Youth: An Exploratory Study of the Assaultive Experience and Assaultive Potential of California Youth Authority Wards,” 9 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 171.Google Scholar
WENK, Ernat A., and James O., ROBISON (1971) “Assaultive Experience and Assaultive Potential: An Exploratory Study,” Unpublished paper prepared for the National Council on Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar
WENK, Ernst A., James O., ROBISON, and Gerald W., SMITH (1972) “Can Violence Be Predicted?” 18 Crime and Delinquency 393.Google Scholar
WILKINS, Leslie T. (1958) “A Small Comparative Study of the Results of Probation,” 8 British Journal of Delinquency 201.Google Scholar
WOLFGANG, Marvin, Robert M., FIGLIO, and Thorsten, SELLIN (1972) Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar