Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T02:18:40.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tom R. Tyler ,
Stephen Schulhofer  and
Aziz Z. Huq
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study considers the circumstances under which members of the Muslim American community voluntarily cooperate with police efforts to combat terrorism. Cooperation is defined to include both a general receptivity toward helping the police in antiterror work and the specific willingness to alert police to terror-related risks in a community. We compare two perspectives on why people cooperate with law enforcement, both developed with reference to general policing, in the context of antiterror policing and specifically among members of the Muslim American community. The first is instrumental. It suggests that people cooperate because they see tangible benefits that outweigh any costs. The second perspective is normative. It posits that people respond to their belief that police are a legitimate authority. On this view we link legitimacy to the fairness and procedural justice of police behavior. Data from a study involving interviews with Muslim Americans in New York City between March and June 2009 strongly support the normative model by finding that the procedural justice of police activities is the primary factor shaping legitimacy and cooperation with the police.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 365 - 402
Copyright
© 2010 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research reported was funded by the Law and Social Science Program of the National Science Foundation (NSF0751874). Stephen Schulhofer wishes to acknowledge the additional research support of the Filomen D'Agostino and Max E. Greenberg Research Fund at New York University School of Law and the excellent research assistance of Andrea Lofgren. We thank Lisa Currie, Robb Magaw, Chris Muller, and Sarah Sayeed for help with the study.

References

Ajzen, Icek, & Fishbein, Martin (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
American Association for Public Opinion Research (2008) Standard Definitions: Final Disposition of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.Google Scholar
Bayley, David, & Mendelsohn, Harold (1969) Minorities and the Police. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, David, & Weisburd, David (2009) “Cops and Spooks: The Role of the Police in Counterterrorism,” in Weisburd, D. et al., eds., To Protect and To Serve. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Daniel, & Simon, Steven (2005) The Next Attack: The Globalization of Jihad. London: Hodder & Staughton.Google Scholar
Blader, Steven L., & Tyler, Tom R. (2009) “Testing and Expanding the Group Engagement Model,” 94 J. of Applied Psychology 445–64.Google Scholar
Brockner, Joel, et al. (2001) “Culture and Procedural Justice: The Influence of Power Distance on Reactions to Voice,” 37 J. of Experimental Social Psychology 300–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Peter (2009) “The Courts and Terrorism: Transatlantic Observations.” Presented at the Center for Law and Security Conference, New York University School of Law, 15 April.Google Scholar
Collins, Reed (2007) “Strolling While Poor: How Broken-Windows Policing Created a New Crime in Baltimore,” 14 Georgetown Journal on Law and Policy 419–39.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha (1981) “The Causes of Terrorism,” 13 Comparative Politics 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha (1983) Terrorism, Legitimacy, and Power. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Curtin, Roger, et al. (2005) “Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse Over the Past Quarter Century,” 69 Public Opinion Q. 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Darren W. (2007) Negative Liberty. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Davis, Darren W., & Silver, Brian D. (2004) “Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America,” 48 American J. of Political Science 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, Richard (2008) “Law Enforcement in Subordinated Communities: Innovation and Response,” 106 Michigan Law Rev. 1193–212.Google Scholar
Dickey, Christopher (2009) Securing the City: Inside America's Best Counterterrorism Force—the NYPD. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Donohue, Laura K. (2008) The Cost of Counterterrorism: Power, Politics, and Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, Richard F. (2009) Terrorism: How to Respond. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fair, Christine (in press) “Pakistan's Own War on Terror,” J. of International Affairs, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fischer, Ronald, et al. (2008) “Support for Resistance Among Iraqi Students,” 30 Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, John R. P. Jr., & Raven, Bertram (1959) “The Bases of Social Power,” in Cartwright, D., ed., Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Harb, Charles, et al. (2006) “Understanding Support for Resistance in Iraq.” Paper presented at 18th Congress of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Spetses, Greece, July.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard (2001) Illusion of Order: The False Promises of Broken Windows Policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hasisi, Badi, et al. (2009) “The Impact of Policing Terrorism on Society,” in Weisburd, D. et al., eds., To Protect and To Serve. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hofstede, Gerde (1980) Culture's Consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Huq, Aziz Z., & Muller, Christopher (2008) “The War on Crime as Precursor to the War on Terror,” 1 International J. of Law, Crime, and Justice 215–29.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jack (1988) Seductions of Crime. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Kelling, George L., & Coles, Catherine M. (1996) Fixing Broken Windows. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C., & Hamilton, V. Lee (1989) Crimes of Obedience. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kepel, George (2002) Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David (2009) The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Alan B., & Maleckova, Jitka (2003) “Education, Poverty and Terrorism,” 17 J. of Economic Perspectives 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, Gary, & Ackerman, Gary (2009) “The Empirical Study of Terrorism: Social and Legal Research,” 5 Annual Rev. of Law and Social Science 347–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, Gary, et al. (2009) “The Impact of British Counterterrorist Strategies on Political Violence in Northern Ireland: Comparing Deterrence and Backlash Models,” 47 Criminology 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Karen I. (2003) Muslims in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Lum, Cynthia, & Haberfield, Maria, et al. (2009) “Police Activities to Counter Terrorism,” in Weisburd, D. et al., eds., To Protect and To Serve. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lum, Cynthia, & Kennedy, Leslie W., et al. (2006) “Are Counter-Terrorism Strategies Effective? The Results of the Campbell Systematic Review on Counter-Terrorism Evaluation Research,” 2 J. of Experimental Criminology 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Clark (2006) “Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism,” in Bongar, B. et al., eds., Psychology of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, Clark, & Scheckter, Sarah (2008) “What's Special about U.S. Muslims? The War on Terrorism as Seen by Muslims in the United States, Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, and Indonesia,” 31 Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 973–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. (1998) “Criminal Deterrence at the Onset of the 21st Century,” 23 Crime and Justice 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jamie, & Tyler, Tom R. (2008) “Does Moral Conviction Really Override Concerns About Procedural Justice?,” 21 Social Justice Research 509–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (2004) The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Tram (2005) We Are All Suspects Now: Untold Stories from Immigrant Communities After 9/11. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Willard M. (2006) Homeland Security for Policing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pargeter, Alison (2008) The New Frontiers of Jihad: Radical Islam in Europe. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center (2006) The Great Divide: How Westerners and Muslims View Each Other. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (2007) Countering Terrorism: Blurred Focus, Halting Steps. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rabasa, Angel M., et al. (2004) The Muslim World after 9/11. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashbaum, William (2006) “Informant in Bomb Plot Tells of His Visits to Mosques,” New York Times, New York/Region section, 2 May.Google Scholar
Reisig, Michael D., et al. (2007) “The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures,” 34 Criminal Justice and Behavior 1005–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., et al. (1997) “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy,” 277 Science 918–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, Jacob N. C., & Fair, Christine (2009) “Understanding Support for Islamist Militancy in Pakistan,” 34 International Security 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Gene (1973) The Politics of Non-Violent Actions. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence (1993) “Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of Criminal Sanction,” 30 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 445–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda, & Mullen, Elizabeth (2002) “Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning,” 28 Personality and Social Psychology Bull. 1419–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G., & Frydl, Kathleen, eds. (2004) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (2007) The Faces of Terrorism: Social and Psychological Dimensions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John L., et al. (1982) Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, & Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 555–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankebe, Justice (2009a) “Public Cooperation With the Police in Ghana: Does Procedural Fairness Matter?,” 47 Criminology 1265–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankebe, Justice (2009b) “Self-Help, Policing, and Procedural Justice: Ghanaian Vigilantism and the Rule of Law,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006a) “Legitimacy and Legitimation,” 57 Annual Rev. of Psychology 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R. (2006b) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2007) Psychology and the Design of Legal Institutions. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2008) “Psychology and Institutional Design,” 4 Rev. of Law and Economics (symposium issue on “Law and Social Norms”). The Berkeley Electronic Press 801–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2009) “Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation,” 7 Ohio State J. of Criminal Law 307–59.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Fagan, Jeffrey (2008) “Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities?,” 6 Ohio State J. of Criminal Law 231–75.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Huo, Yuen (2002) Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Lind, E. Allan, et al. (2000) “Cultural Values and Authority Relations,” 6 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Sherman, Lawrence, et al. (2007) “Reintegrative Shaming, Procedural Justice, and Recidivism: The Engagement of Offenders' Psychological Mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-Driving Experiment,” 41 Law & Society Rev. 553–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh (2003) “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality,” 1 Perspectives on Politics 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Stefan (2005) “Islam and the Institutions of a Free Society,” 10 The Independent Rev. 59–82.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1968) Economy and Ssociety, Eds. Roth, G. & Wittich, C. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David et al., eds. (2009) To Protect and Serve: Policing in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Yavari, Neguin (2002) “Muslim Communities in New York City,” 10 International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World Newsletter 35.Google Scholar