Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:11:32.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legitimizing American Indian Sovereignty: Mobilizing the Constitutive Power of Law through Institutional Entrepreneurship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Erich W. Steinman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extensive sociolegal scholarship has addressed the utility of law as a mechanism through which marginalized groups may promote social change. Within this debate, scholars employing the legal mobilization approach have thus far highlighted law's indirect impact, beyond the formal arenas of law, via effects on the “legal consciousness” of reformers and would-be reformers. This article contributes to this debate, and the legal mobilization framework in particular, by theoretically identifying and empirically documenting ways through which the constitutive power of law may be effectively used by challengers to more directly pursue changes in institutionalized practices themselves. The article examines the strategic use of law by a set of American Indian tribal leaders in the state of Washington who, over a 13-year period, consciously meshed or “cohered” legal and extrajudicial efforts to gain recognition of their sovereign political status. Through a mode of agency known as “institutional entrepreneurship,” they utilized the multiplicity of law and exploited resources and opportunities inhering within the state itself, but outside the courts. In the context of ambiguous legal precedent and widespread local challenges to tribal rights, they mobilized latent discourses of federal Indian law that legitimated the sovereign governmental status of tribes. Importantly, they circulated tribal sovereignty discourses well beyond the field of law, but through the authoritative activity and voice of the state, and in doing so, generated a precedent-setting recognition of tribal sovereignty.

Type
Native American Fishing Rights in the Northwest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 759 - 792
Copyright
© 2005 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allen, Ron (1993) “Reflections on the Washington State Experience,” in Kern, M., proceedings ed. and producer, Working Effectively at the Local Level: Tribal/County Cooperation and Coordination. Olympia, WA: Northwest Renewable Resources Center.Google Scholar
American Friends Service Committee (1970) Uncommon Controversy: Fishing Rights of the Muckleshoot, Puyallup, and Nisqually Indians. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bayer, Ronald (1987) Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald (1994) Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of the American Industrial Order, 1865–1917. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins Univ. Pres.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Amy J. (2002) Contentious Curricula: Afrocentrism and Creationism in American Public Schools. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Biolsi, Thomas (2001) “Deadliest Enemies” Law and Making of Race Relations on and off Rosebud Reservation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Blumm, Michael C. (2002) Sacrificing the Salmon: A Legal and Policy History of the Decline of Columbia Basin Salmon. Den Bosch, The Netherlands: BookWorld Publications.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. (2002) “Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy,” 28 Annual Rev. of Sociology 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (1997) The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, Robert N., et al. (1991) American Indian Law: Cases and Materials. Charlottesville, VA: Michie Company.Google Scholar
Cohen, Fay G. (1986) Treaties on Trial: The Continuing Controversy over Northwest Indian Fishing Rights. Seattle and London: Univ. of Washington Press.Google Scholar
DeLaCruz, Joe, et al. (1986) “What Indians Should Want: Advice to the President,” in Philp, K., ed., Indian Self-Rule. Salt Lake City: Howe Brothers.Google Scholar
Deloria, Vine Jr., ed. (1985) American Indian Policy in the Twentieth Century. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Deloria, Vine Jr., & Lytle, Clifford M. (1984) The Nations Within: The Past and Future of American Indian Sovereignty. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, & Sutton, John R. (1998) “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions,” 104 American J. of Sociology 441–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey (2005) “In the Name of Equal Rights: ‘Special’ Rights & the Politics of Resentment in Post–Civil Rights America,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 723–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., et al. (1999) “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth,” 105 American J. of Sociology 406–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1977) Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1992) “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness,” 26 New England Law Rev. 731–49.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Roger, & Alford, Robert R. (1991) “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions,” in Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco G., & Passy, Florence (1998) “Contentious Politics in Complex Societies: New Social Movements between Conflict and Cooperation,” in McAdam, D. & Tilly, C., eds., From Contention to Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan, & Milner, Neal (2003) “Rights as Excess: Understanding the Politics of Special Rights,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 1075–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selection from the Prison Notebooks, Eds. Hoare, Q. & Smith, G. Nowell. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Grossman, Zoltan (1992) “Treaty Rights and Responding to Anti-Indian Activity,” in When Hate Groups Come to Town: A Handbook of Effective Community Responses. Atlanta: Center for Democratic Renewal.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1990) “Rights and Social Movements: Counter-Hegemonic Strategies,” 17 J. of Law & Society 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L., et al. (1996) “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein, P. J., ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, Bruce E. (2000) “The New Terminators: The Anti-Indian Movement Resurfaces,” 17 Native Americas 42–53.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (1990) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kostiner, Idit (2003) “Evaluating Legality: Toward a Cultural Approach to the Study of Law and Social Change,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 323–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1986) Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1992) “Reform Litigation on Trial,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 715–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1998) “How Does Law Matter for Social Movements?,” in Garth, B. & Sarat, A., eds., How Does Law Matter? Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., et al. (1987) “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account,” in Thomas, G., et al., eds., Institutional Structure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, & Skowronek, Stephen (1994) “Beyond the Iconography of Order,” in Dodd, L. C. & Jillson, C., eds., New Perspectives on American Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Paris, Michael (2001) “Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Reform: Lessons from School Finance Litigation in Kentucky 1984–1995,” 26 Law & Social Inquiry 631–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, Kenneth (1986) Indian Self-Rule. Salt Lake City: Howe Brothers.Google Scholar
Pommersheim, Frank (1995) Braids of Feathers: American Indian Law and Contemporary Tribal Life. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Ryser, ed. (1992) Solving Intergovernmental Conflicts: Tribes and States in Conflict, A Tribal Proposal. Olympia, WA: Center for World Indigenous Studies. Originally published by Quinault Indian Nation/Inter-tribal Study Group on Tribal/State Relations (1980).Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard (2002) “Organizations and the Natural Environment: Evolving Models,” in Hoffman, A. J. & Ventresca, M. J., eds., Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1996) Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrentny, John David (1996) The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrentny, John David (2002) The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinman, Erich (2004) “Federalism and Intergovernmental Innovation in Contemporary State-Tribal Relations,” 34 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dick (1993) “Reflections on the Washington State Experience,” in Kern, M., proceedings ed. and producer, Working Effectively at the Local Level: Tribal/County Cooperation and Coordination. Olympia, WA: Northwest Renewable Resources Center.Google Scholar
United States Commission on Civil Rights (1977) Hearing before the United States Commission on Civil Rights: American Indian Issues in the State of Washington, October 19–20. Seattle: United States Commission on Civil Rights.Google Scholar
Washington Council of Tribal Governments (1976) Tribal Government and Washington State Relations: A Blueprint for State Government Organizations to Conduct Relations with Tribal Governments. Unpublished strategy document, on file with author.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Bill (1993) “Perspectives on Tribal, State and Local Cooperation: No Simple Matter,” in Kern, M., proceedings ed. and producer, Working Effectively at the Local Level: Tribal/County Cooperation and Coordination. Olympia, WA: Northwest Renewable Resources Center.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David E. (1997) American Indian Sovereignty and the U.S. Supreme Court: The Masking of Justice. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David E. (2002) American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Charles F. (1987) American Indians, Time and the Law: Native Societies in a Modern Constitutional Democracy. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sara, & Quenemoen, Paula (1991) “Government-to-Government Relations—Indian Tribes and the States.” State-commissioned research report, on file with author. Salt Lake City: Office of the Governor, State of Utah.Google Scholar

Government Documents Cited

Centennial Accord between the Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in Washington State and the State of Washington, signed August 4, 1989. Available at http://www.goia.wa.gov/Government-to-Government/Data/CentennialAccord.htm.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 95th Cong., 1st sess., 1977. Vol. 123.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 95th Cong., 2nd sess., 1978. Vol. 124.Google Scholar

Statute Cited

Indian Reorganization Act 48 Stat. 984 (1934).Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831).Google Scholar
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978).Google Scholar
Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court, 573 F 2d 1123 (1978).Google Scholar
United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886).Google Scholar
United States v. Washington, 384 F Supp 312 (1974).Google Scholar