Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:20:01.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Pain: A Political Institutionalist Analysis of Crime Victims' Moral Protests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Vanessa Barker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Like the new social movements, crime victim movements were part of broad cultural struggles to redefine the character of social order in the late twentieth century. Motivated by pain and outrage over criminal victimization, they were engaged in highly charged moral protests over the rights and duties of state government and the relative value of human life. This article argues that the degree to which crime victims were part of a retributive movement—the restriction of criminal offenders' rights and liberties—or part of a restorative movement to repair victims' well-being depended on the political context in which they were operating, specifically the structure of the democratic process. The case studies suggest that a context with a high degree of democratization but intensive social polarization was more likely to deepen crime victims' demands for vengeance as well as provide their legal and political expression, while a context with intensive civic engagement but well-developed social trust and norms of reciprocity was more likely to bring about pragmatic measures, intermixing restorative and restrictive approaches to criminal victimization. This article seeks to extend the literature on political institutionalism by integrating the structural constraints of institutions with the power of human agency.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 619 - 664
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I extend my sincere thanks to Herbert Kritzer for his astute and supportive editorial advice, three anonymous reviewers for their critical interventions, and David Garland; Nitsan Chorev; Lars Trägårdh; the Politics, Power & Protest Workshop at New York University; the Law & Public Affairs Program at Princeton University; Marie Gottschalk, Paul Rock, Jon Gould, and Valerie Jenness for comments on earlier drafts.

References

References

Agnew, Robert (1982) Letter to Paul Gann, June 2. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1392, Folder 5. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Allswang, John M. (2000) The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898–1998. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, & Young, Michael P. (1999) “Democratic States and Social Movements: Theoretical Arguments and Hypotheses,” 46 Social Problems 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, et al. (1994) “Stolen Thunder? Huey Long's ‘Share Our Wealth,’ Political Mediation, and the Second New Deal,” 59 American Sociological Rev. 678–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, Thomas (1969) “Policy-Making and Political Culture in Sweden,” 4 Scandinavian Political Studies 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, James, et al. (1999) “The Impact of ‘Three-Strikes and You're Out,’ 1 Punishment & Society 131–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassare, Mark (2005) PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey on Californians and the Initiative Process. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa (2006) “The Politics of Punishing: Building a State Governance Theory of American Imprisonment Variation,” 8 Punishment & Society 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Katherine (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Beyle, Thad (2004) “Governors,” in Gray, V. & Hanson, R., eds., Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Boerner, David (1992) “Confronting Violence: In the Act and in the Word,” 15 University of Puget Sound Law Rev. 525–77.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Pettit, Philip (1990) Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar, & Tydén, Mattias (1996) “Eugenics in Sweden: Efficient Care,” in Broberg, G. & Roll-Hansen, N., eds., Eugenics and the Welfare State. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brockman, Anne R. (1981) Letter to Paul Gann. Proposition 8: Analyses & Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Brown, Edmund G. Jr. (1976) Report to the Legislature January 7. Governor's Office, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004) Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006) “Homicide Trends in the United States,” http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/hmrt.htm (accessed 8 Aug. 2006).Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, & Miller, Kenneth (2001) “The Populist Legacy: Initiatives and Undermining of Representative Democracy,” in Sabato, L. et al., eds., Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
California Field Poll (1978) Release #1009, November 7, 1978. San Francisco: The Field Institute. Institute of Governmental Studies Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
California Field Poll (1981) Release #1128, August 25, 1981. San Francisco: The Field Institute. Institute of Governmental Studies Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
California Field Poll (1982a) Release #1163, April 22, 1982. San Francisco: The Field Institute. Institute of Governmental Studies Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
California Field Poll (1982b) Release #1164, April 20, 1982. San Francisco: The Field Institute. Institute of Governmental Studies Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
California Secretary of State (2002) “A History of California Initiatives,” http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/init_history.pdf (accessed 20 July 2006).Google Scholar
California State Constitution (2005) Article 1, Declaration of Rights, Section 28, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/const-toc.html (accessed 29 Sept. 2005).Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth (1997) The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colla, Piero (2002) “Race, Nation, and Folk: On the Repressed Memory of World War II in Sweden and Its Hidden Categories,” in Trägårdh, L. & Witoszek, N., eds., Crisis and Culture: The Case of Germany and Sweden. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Collins, Milton (1981) Letter to Paul Gann, August 2. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert (1986) “Violence and the Word,” 95 Yale Law J. 1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curb, Mike et al. (1981) “Arguments in Favor of Proposition 8. California Ballot Measures Database,” Hastings Library, http://traynor.uchastings.edu/cgi-bin/starfinder/729.capproptext. (accessed 28 July 2006).Google Scholar
Davis, Treena (1981) Letter to Paul Gann. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony, & Webster, Cheryl Marie (2006) “Countering Punitiveness: Understanding Stability in Canada's Imprisonment Rate,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 325–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edsall, Thomas, & Edsall, Mary (1991) Chain Reaction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Elias, Robert (1986) The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977) Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gamson, William (1990) The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Gann, Paul (1980) Citizens Committee to Stop Crime. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 7. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Gann, Paul (1981a) Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393 Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento.Google Scholar
Gann, Paul (1981b) News Clippings. Paul Gann Archive. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Gann, Paul (1981c) Television Interview, Channel 24, Los Angeles, September 16. Paul Gann Archive., California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Gardner, Booth (1990) State of the State Address January 11. Governor's Papers. Speeches. Box 8 93-A-24. Washington State Library and Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Gardner, Booth (1991) State of the State Address January 14. Governor's Papers. Speeches. Box 8 93-A-24. Washington State Library and Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Garland, David (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Late Modernity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1993) “Problems of Action and Structure,” in Cassells, P., ed., The Giddens Reader. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard L., et al. (1981) Arguments Opposed to Proposition 8. California Ballot Measures Data base. Hastings Library. http://traynor.uchastings.edu/cgi-bin/starfinder/729.calproptext (accessed 28 July 2006).Google Scholar
Goodey, Jo (2000) “An Overview of Key Themes,” in Crawford, A. & Goodey, J., eds., Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice. Hants, United Kingdom: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie (2006) The Prison & the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, & Hanson, Russell L., eds. (2004) Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Green, David (2006) “Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime: Correcting the ‘Comedy of Errors,’,” 46 British J. of Criminology 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1981) The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hallett, Carol (1981) Letter to Paul Gann, June 17. Endorsements: Proposition 8. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1394, Folder 1. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig (2006) Reforming Punishment: Psychological Limits to the Pain of Imprisonment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, & Madsen, Henrik (1987) Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, James (1997) The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Gerry (2000) “Penal Policy Making: Elitist, Populist or Participatory,” 2 Punishment & Society 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Trevor, & Newburn, Tim (2005) “Comparative Criminal Justice Policy-Making in the United States and the United Kingdom,” 45 British J. of Criminology 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminer, Wendy (1995) It's All the Rage: Crime & Culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1986) “Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” 16 British J. of Political Science 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen (2002) “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the US States,” 46 American J. of Political Science 772–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasch, Christopher (1979) The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Loader, Ian (forthcoming) Playing with Fire? Democracy and the Emotions of Crime and Punishment,” in Karsedt, S. et al., eds., Emotions, Crime & Punishment. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2002) “Pedophiles and Cyber-Predators as Contaminating Forces: The Language of Disgust, Pollution, and Boundary Invasion in Federal Debates on Sex Offender Legislation,” 27 Law & Social Inquiry 529–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Mike (1991) “The Needs and Rights of Victims of Crime,” 14 Crime & Justice 363–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maleng, Norm (1989) Governor's Task Force on Community Protection Report, November 28. Governor's Task Force on Community Protection. Senate: Law & Justice Committees. 91-A-201 Box 14. Washington State Library and Archives, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter (1997) “Immigrants, Crime and Criminal Justice in Sweden,” in Tonry, M., ed., Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mays, Mrs. Robert (1981) Letter to Paul Gann. Proposition 8: Analyses & Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
McCoy, Candace (1993) Politics and Plea Bargaining: Victims' Rights in California. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, G. (1981) Letter to Paul Gann, September 14. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Miller, Lisa (2001) “Looking for Postmodernism in All the Wrong Places: Implementing a New Penology,” 41 British J. of Criminology 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morone, James A. (2003) Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval (1974) The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, John (2000) “Emotive and Ostentatious Punishment: Its Decline and Resurgence in Modern Society,” 2 Punishment & Society 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick, & Baldassare, Mark (2004) The Ties That Bind: Changing Demographics and Civic Engagement in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Revised Code of Washington State (1994) “Revised Code of Washington State 9.94A.670,” http://search.leg.wa.gov/pub/textsearch/ViewRoot.asp?Action=Html&Item=9&X=518113201&p=1 (accessed 17 May 2007); “Revised Code of Washington State 71.09,” http://search.leg.wa.gov/pub/textsearch/ViewRoot.asp?Action=Html&Item=7&X=518101216&p=1 (accessed 17 May 2007).Google Scholar
Rock, Paul (1988) “Governments, Victims, and Policies in Two Countries,” 28 British J. of Criminology 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Göran (2002) “The Crisis of Consensus in Post-War Sweden,” in Trägårdh, L. & Witoszek, N., eds., Crisis and Culture: The Case of Germany and Sweden. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (2003) “Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?,” in Mahoney, J. & Rueschemeyer, D., eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. (1994) “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment,” 99 American J. of Sociology 911–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine (1987) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart (1991) The Politics of Street Crime: Criminal Process and Cultural Obsession. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart, et al. (1994) “Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy, and Republican Criminology: Washington State's Community Protection Act,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 729–63.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan, & Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion (2001) “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective,” 66 American Sociological Rev. 806–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Heather (2002) Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, John (2000) “Imprisonment and Social Classification in Five Common Law Countries, 1955–1985,” 106 American J. of Sociology 350–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Gresham (1971) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (1995) Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, Lars (2007) “Democratic Governance and the Creation of Social Capital in Sweden: The Discreet Charm of Governmental Commissions,” in Trägårdh, L., ed., State and Civil Society in Northern Europe: The Swedish Model Reconsidered. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Boeckmann, Robert J. (1997) “Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 237–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, Loic (2001) “Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh,” in Garland, D., ed., Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wakefield, Mickey (1981) Letter to Paul Gann, December 15. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Walker, Doris (1981) Letter to Paul Gann, August 17. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 6. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Washington Secretary of State (2006) “Elections: Index to Initiatives and Referendum History and Statistics, 1914–2005,” http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/initiatives/statistics.aspx (accessed 20 July 2006).Google Scholar
Washington State Citizens Council on Crime (1966) Council minutes, February 22. Governor Daniel Evans gubernatorial papers. Washington State Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Washington State Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Civil Unrest (1968) Report on Race and Violence in Washington. Governor Daniel Evans gubernatorial papers. Washington State Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Washington State Department of Corrections (n.d.) “Community Corrections Population Characteristics,” http://www.doc.wa.gov/general/communitypopcharacteristics.htm (accessed 10 Dec. 2003).Google Scholar
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (2006) “Statistics on the Number of Persons Civilly Committed to the Special Commitment Center Program,” http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/hrsa/scc/Stats.htm (accessed 23 Sept. 2006).Google Scholar
Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2005a) Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: How Sex Offenders Differ from Other Felony Offenders September 2. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2005b) Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Initial Sentencing Decision September 16. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Washington State Office of Crime Victims Advocacy (2006) “Office of Crime Victim Advocacy,” http://www.cted.wa.gov/portal/alias_lang_en/tabID_244 (accessed 23 Sept. 2006).Google Scholar
Washington State Senate Law & Justice Committee (1990) Public Hearings on Community Protection, January 9–12. Audiotapes. Washington State Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Washington State Sentencing Guidelines Commission (19811983) Sentencing Guidelines Public Hearings and Written Comments. Governor John Spellman gubernatorial papers. Issues. Sentencing Guidelines Commission 2U-08-045. Washington State Archive, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
Weed, Frank (1995) Certainty of Justice: Reform in the Crime Victim Movement. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce, & Beckett, Katherine (1999) “How Unregulated is the US Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution,” 104 American J. of Sociology 1135–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q. (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Willis, James J. (2005) “Transportation versus Imprisonment in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain: Penal Power, Liberty, and the State,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 171–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, C. T. (1981) Letter to California Assemblywoman Carol Hallett, July 8. Proposition 8: Analyses and Correspondence. Paul Gann Archive. Box 1393, Folder 5. California History Section, California State Library, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, et al. (2001) Punishment & Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Community Protection Act. Washington Laws Ch. 3, Sec. 1002, Revised Code of Washington Sec. 71.09 (1990).Google Scholar
Proposition 1. New Prison Construction Bond Act. California Penal Code, Title 7, Part 3, Sec. 1, Ch. 12 (1981).Google Scholar
Proposition 8. Victims Bill of Rights. California State Constitution. Article 1, Declaration of Rights, Sec. 28; California Codes, Title 17, Penal Code Sec. 679.01 (1982).Google Scholar
Proposition 13. Property Tax Postponement. California State Constitution. Article XIII, Sec. 8.5 (1978).Google Scholar
Proposition 115. Crime Victim Justice Reform Act. California State Constitution. Article 1, Sec. 30; California Penal Code, Sec. 859, 1054 (1990).Google Scholar
Proposition 184. Increased Sentences. Repeat Offenders (Three Strikes). California State Constitution. Article II, Sec. 8; California Penal Code, Sec. 1, Sec 1170.12 (1994).Google Scholar
Proposition 187. Illegal Aliens. Ineligibility for Public Services. Verification and Reporting. California State Constitution. Article II, Sec. 8; Penal Code, Sec. 113–114, 834b; Welfare and Institutions Code, Sec. 10001.5 (1994).Google Scholar
Proposition 209. Prohibition Against Discrimination of Preferential Treatment by State and Other Public Entities. California State Constitution. Article 1, Sec. 31 (1995).Google Scholar
Special Sexual Offender Sentencing Alternatives. Revised Code of Washington. Sec. 9.94A.670.Google Scholar