Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T21:03:19.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pop-Up Property: Enacting Ownership from San Francisco to Sydney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Through a detailed examination of PARK(ing) Day, a loosely organized international event to reclaim street space from cars, this article reveals the intimate connection between property and its social and material context. Private claims to public streets are not uncommon. In some cases, such claims are swiftly rejected. In others, they receive recognition and respect. Focusing on the particular set of proprietary claims within PARK(ing) Day, this article examines the ways in which property on city streets is claimed and contested. Drawing primarily on fieldwork in Sydney, Australia, the analysis emphasizes the degree to which property depends on the networks in which it is situated. PARK(ing) Day was based on a creative rereading of the property producible by paying a parking meter, and this link with legality plays a key role in the event. Yet the property at issue is based on much more than that simple transaction. A more emergent and socially constructed conception of ownership is central in understanding both the making of claims to city streets on PARK(ing) Day and the range of responses they generate.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2018 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Early drafts of this article were greatly improved, thanks to generous feedback from Hanoch Dagan, Eric Feldman, Doug Harris, Stewart Macaulay, Desmond Manderson, Bronwen Morgan, and the anonymous reviewers, as well as discussion at the Penn-Stanford International Junior Faculty Forum in 2016 and the Property in the City workshop at the University of British Columbia in 2017.

References

Alexander, Gregory S., & Peñalver, Eduardo Moisés (2012) An Introduction to Property Theory (Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law Cambridge). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Greogry S., et al. (2008) “A Statement of Progressive Property,” 94 Cornell Law Rev. 743–4.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (1994) Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2004) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2005) “Flowers in the Bathtub: Boundary Crossings at the Public–private Divide,” 36 Geoforum 281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2007) “Making Private Property: Enclosure, Common Right and the Work of Hedges,” 18 Rural History 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2011) Rights of Passage: Sidewalks and the Regulation of Public Flow. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2013) “Performing Property: Making the World,” 26 XXVI Canadian J. of Law and Jurisprudence 2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2016) “The Boundaries of Property: Complexity, Relationality, and Spatiality,” 50 Law & Society Rev. 224–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Philip (2002) “From Property Rights to Public Control: The Quest for Public Interest in the Control of Urban Development,” 73 Town Planning Rev. 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, Irus (2014) “Who's Afraid of Methodology? Advocating a Methodological Turn in Legal Geography,” in, Braverman, I., et al., eds., The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brettell, Caroline, ed. (1996) When They Read What We Write: The Politics of Ethnography. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (2010) “Performative Agency,” 3 J. of Cultural Economy 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, Chris, ed. (2002a) Critical Mass: Bicycling's Defiant Celebration. Edinburgh, Scotland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Chris, ed. (2002b) “Bicycling over the Rainbow: Redesigning Cities - and Beyond,” in Critical Mass: Bicycling's Defiant Celebration. Edinburgh, Scotland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Chris, ed. (2002c) “Cycling Under the Radar—Assertive Desertion,” in Carlsson, C., ed., Critical Mass: Bicycling's Defiant Celebration. Edinburgh, Scotland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Carswell, Andrew (2015) “Park Raving Mad,” The Daily Telegraph 19 June.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory. Introducing Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris (1933) Law and the Social Order. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co..Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (1998) Governing out of Order: Space, Law, and the Politics of Belonging. London: Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (2007) “Opening up Ownership: Community Belonging, Belongings, and the Productive Life of Property,” 32 Law & Social Inquiry 625–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Davina (2014) Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Benjamin F., & Miller, William L., eds (1999) Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch (2011) Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telegraph, Daily (2016) “Backpackers Camp in Prime Sydney Spots Free, Aggravating Residents,” The Daily Telegraph, Mar.14.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret (2007) Property: Meanings, Histories and Theories. Abingdon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslandes, Ann (2013) “Exemplary Amateurism: Thoughts on DIY Urbanism,” 19 Cultural Studies Rev. 216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, R. T. (2011) “An Area That Governs Itself’: Informality, Uncertainty and the Management of Street Vending in New York City,” 10 Planning Theory 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Lizia, Fabian (2013) “Food Trucks Take Away Local Business?Alt Media. Available online at: http://www.altmedia.net.au/food-trucks-facing-community-derision/73033 (accessed 4 February 2017).Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991) Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. (2002) “The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads,” 31 The J. of Legal Studies S51544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life (Language and Legal Discourse). Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fainstein, Susan S. (2001) The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas. 19802000.Google Scholar
Flynn, Alexandra (2016) “Regulating Critical Mass: Performativity and City Streets,” 37 Windsor Rev. of Legal and Social Issues 98117.Google Scholar
Freyfogle, Eric T. (2007) On Private Property: Finding Common Ground on the Ownership of Land. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Kevin (1991) “Property in Thin Air,” 50 Cambridge Law J. 252307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Kevin (2009) “Property in a Queue,” in, Alexander, G. S., & Peñalver, E. M., eds., Property and Community. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Kevin, & Gray, Susan Francis (1998) The Idea of Property in Land. Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. 1551.Google Scholar
Halliday, Simon, & Schmidt, Patrick D. (2009) Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (1985, July/August) “Pigs and Positivism,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 899935.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. (1999) “The Boundaries of Private Property,” 108 Yale Law J. 1163–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Larissa (2008) “Exclusion and Exclusivity in Property Law,” 58 Univ. of Toronto Law J. 275315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Sarah (2010) “Subversive Property: Reshaping Malleable Spaces of Belonging,” 19 Social & Legal Studies 423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Sarah (2014) Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasserre, Michael R. (2013) “Location, Location, Location: The Food Truck's Battle for Common Ground,” 44 Cumberland Law Rev. 283318.Google Scholar
Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia, & Ehrenfeucht, Renia (2009) Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation over Public Space. Urban and Industrial Environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydon, Mike, & Garcia, Anthony (2015) Tactical Urbanism. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1978) “The Meaning of Property,” in Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto, Canada: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1978) “Bourgeois Property and Capitalist Accumulation,” in, Macpherson, C. B., ed., Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto, Canada: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McAuslan, Patrick (1980) The Ideologies of Planning Law. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
McKenny, Leesha (2014, January 6) “Free Parking: Prime Spots Provide Backpacker Haven but Locals Not Impressed,” Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
Merker, Blaine (2010) “Taking Place: Rebar's Absurd Tactics in Generous Urbanism,” in, Hou, J., ed., Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, & Smith, Henry (2001) “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?111 Yale Law J. 357–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Don (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mukhija, Vinit, & Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia, eds (2014) The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor. Urban and Industrial Environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Peter, & Kenworthy, Jeffrey R. (1999) Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Norcliffe, G. B. (2015) Critical Geographies of Cycling: History, Political Economy and Culture (Transport and Society). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
PARK(Ing) Day Archive (n.d.), Available at: http://parkingday.org/archive/ (accessed 24 March 2017).Google Scholar
Parlett, Malcolm, & Hamilton, David (1977) “Evaluation as Illumination: A New Approach to the Study of Innovatory Programs,” in, Hamilton, D., ed., Beyond the Numbers Game: A Reader in Educational Evaluation. McCutchan: Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Place, Partners (2012) “We're in the News!PlacePartners. Available online at: http://www.placepartners.com.au/blog/were-news (accessed September 14 2016).Google Scholar
Passmore, Matthew (2016) Interview with author, 11 October.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo, & Katyal, Sonia (2010) Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. (1997) The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
realestate.com.au (2017) Newtown Investment Property Data. realestate.com.au. Available at: http://www.realestate.com.au/invest/house-in-newtown,+nsw+2042 (accessed 4 April 2017).Google Scholar
Rebar (2009) A Note on Participation by Commercial Entities. PARK(ing) Day DIY Planning Network. Available online at: http://my.parkingday.org/profiles/blogs/a-note-on-participation-by (accessed August 17 2016).Google Scholar
Rebar (2011) PARK(ing) Day Manual. Available online at: parkingday.org (accessed September 23 2016).Google Scholar
Reich, Charles (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law J. 733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol (1985) “Possession as the Origin of Property,” 52 The Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sandercock, Leonie (1975) Cities for Sale: Property, Politics, and Urban Planning in Australia. Carlton, Vic: Melbourne Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shoup, Donald C. (2004) The High Cost of Free Parking. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (2010) “Invocations of Law on Snowy Streets,” 5 J. of Comparative Law 6691.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. (2002) “Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights,” 31 The J. of Legal Studies S45387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., Morrill, Calvin, & Anderson, Leon (2003) “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography Linking Fieldwork and Theory,” 4 Ethnography 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Quentin (2007) The Ludic City: Exploring the Potential of Public Spaces. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Veronica, & Busse, Mark, eds., (2011) Ownership and Appropriation. ASA Monographs. New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (1999) Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London, UK: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (2011) “Sharing, Stealing and Borrowing Simultaneously,” in, Strang, V., & Busse, M., eds., Ownership and Appropriation (ASA Monographs). Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Amelia (2018) “Hegel's Hipsters: Claiming Ownership in the Contemporary City,” 27, Social & Legal Studies 2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, Mariana (2012) Everyday Law on the Street: City Governance in an Age of Diversity (The Chicago Series in Law and Society). Chicago, IL: The Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorspan, Rachel (1997) “Freedom of Assembly’ and the Right to Passage in Modern English Legal History,” 34 San Diego Law Rev. 9211046.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2009) “Community and Property-For Those Who Have Neither,” 10 Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 161.Google Scholar
Zegura, Lara (2014) Sydney Food Trucks Trial Report. Sydney: City of Sydney.Google Scholar