Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T16:19:49.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Race and Prosecutorial Discretion in Homicide Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Michael L. Radelet  and
Glenn L. Pierce
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the cases of 1017 homicide defendants in Florida. Two main data sources are used: the police department's classification of the case, as found in the FBI's Supplemental Homicide Reports, and the prosecutor's classification, as determined by court records. Each data set characterizes the homicide as involving felonious circumstances, possible felonious circumstances, or nonfelonious circumstances. Attention is focused on cases that differ in their police and prosecutorial classifications. Results indicate that differences in these classifications are related to defendant's and victim's race, with blacks accused of killing whites the most likely to be “upgraded” and the least likely to be “downgraded.” The process of upgrading is then shown to significantly increase the likelihood of the imposition of a death sentence in cases with white victims where no plea bargain is offered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , 1985 , pp. 587 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by grants from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. and the Chicago Resource Center. We would like to thank Kay Isaly for her assistance in overseeing the data collection, Margaret Vandiver for her assistance in preparing the data for analysis, Alan Agresti and Jane Pendergast for their statistical advice, and William J. Bowers, Samuel R. Gross, Hugo Adam Bedau, Colin Loftin, Daniel Givelber, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. We are especially indebted to Professor Richard O. Lempert for his many hours of extraordinary editorial work with the paper.

References

References

AGRESTI, Alan (1984) Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
BALDUS, David C., George, WOODWORTH and Charles, PULASKI (1983) “Discrimination in Georgia's Capital Charging and Sentencing System: A Preliminary Report.” Unpublished report submitted by petitioner in McCleskey v. Kemp, 753 F. 2nd 877 (1985).Google Scholar
BEDAU, Hugo Adam (1983) “Witness to a Persecution: The Death Penalty and the Dawson Five,” 8 Black Law Journal 7.Google Scholar
BENTELE, Ursula (1985) “The Death Penalty in Georgia: Still Arbitrary,” 62 Washington University Law Quarterly 573.Google Scholar
BERK, Richard (1983) “An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data,” 48 American Sociological Review 386.Google Scholar
BLACK, Charles L. Jr. (1981) Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake, 2nd Ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
BORIS, Steven Barnet (1979) “Stereotypes and Dispositions for Criminal Homicides,” 17 Criminology 139.Google Scholar
BOWERS, William J. (1983) “The Pervasiveness of Arbitrariness and Discrimination under Post-Furman Capital Statutes,” 74 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1067.Google Scholar
BOWERS, William J. and Glenn L., PIERCE (1980) “Arbitrariness and Discrimination under Post-Furman Capital Statutes,” 26 Crime and Delinquency 563.Google Scholar
BOWERS, William J., with PIERCE, Glenn L. and McDEVITT, John F (1984) Legal Homicide: Death as Punishment in America, 1864-1982. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
CARTER, Leif H. (1974) The Limits of Order. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
DIKE, Sara T. (1982) Capital Punishment in the United States. Hackensack, NJ: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar
EHRHARDT, Charles W. and L. Harold, LEVINSON (1973) “Florida's Legislative Response to Furman: An Exercise in Futility?” 64 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 10.Google Scholar
FOLEY, Linda A. and Richard S., POWELL (1982) “The Discretion of Prosecutors, Judges, and Juries in Capital Cases,” 7 Criminal Justice Review 16.Google Scholar
GARFINKEL, Harold (1949) “Research Note on Inter- and Intra-Racial Homicides,” 27 Social Forces 369.Google Scholar
GOODMAN, Leo (1979) “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” 74 Journal of the American Statistical Association 537.Google Scholar
GROSS, Samuel R. and Robert, MAURO (1984) “Patterns of Death: An Analysis of Racial Disparities in Criminal Sentencing and Homicide Victimization,” 37 Stanford Law Review 27.Google Scholar
JACOBY, Joan E. (1979) “The Charging Policies of Prosecutors,” in McDonald, W.F. (ed.), The Prosecutor. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
JACOBY, Joseph E. and Raymond, PATERNOSTER (1982) “Sentencing Disparity and Jury Packing: Further Challenges to the Death Penalty,” 73 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 379.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Elmer H. (1957) “Selective Factors in Capital Punishment,” 36 Social Forces 165.Google Scholar
KLEPPER, Steven, Daniel, NAGIN and Luke-Jon, TIERNEY (1983) “Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature,” in Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S.E. and Tonry, M.H. (eds.), Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
LaFREE, Gary D. (1980) “The Effects of Sexual Stratification by Race on Official Reactions to Rape,” 45 American Sociological Review 842.Google Scholar
LEGAL DEFENSE FUND (1985) “Death Row, U.S.A.” (October 1). New York: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
MAYNARD, Douglas M. (1982) “Defendant Attributes in Plea Bargaining: Notes on the Modeling of Sentencing Decisions,” 29 Social Problems 347.Google Scholar
MULLIN, Courtney (1980) “The Jury System in Death Penalty Cases: A Symbolic Gesture,” 43 Law and Contemporary Problems 137.Google Scholar
MYERS, Martha A. and John, HAGAN (1979) “Private and Public Trouble: Prosecutors and the Allocation of Court Resources,” 26 Social Problems 439.Google Scholar
PANNICK, David (1982) Judicial Review of the Death Penalty. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
PATERNOSTER, Raymond (1983) “Race of Victim and Location of Crime: The Decision to Seek the Death Penalty in South Carolina,” 74 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 754.Google Scholar
PATERNOSTER, Raymond (1984) “Prosecutorial Discretion in Requesting the Death Penalty: A Case of Victim-Based Racial Discrimination,” 18 Law & Society Review 437.Google Scholar
RADELET, Michael L. (1981) “Racial Characteristics and the Imposition of the Death Penalty,” 46 American Sociological Review 918.Google Scholar
RADELET, Michael L. and Margaret, VANDIVER (1983) “The Florida Supreme Court and Death Penalty Appeals,” 74 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 913.Google Scholar
RIEDEL, Marc (1976) “Discrimination in the Imposition of the Death Penalty: A Comparison of Offenders Sentenced to Die Pre-Furman and Post-Furman” 49 Temple Law Quarterly 261.Google Scholar
ROSETT, Arthur and Donald R., CRESSEY (1976) Justice by Consent: Plea Bargains in the American Courthouse. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
SUDNOW, David (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office,” 12 Social Problems 255.Google Scholar
SWIGERT, Victoria L. and Ronald A., FARRELL (1977) “Normal Homicides and the Law,” 42 American Sociological Review 16.Google Scholar
THOMSON, Randall J. and Matthew T., ZINGRAFF (1981) “Detecting Sentencing Disparity: Some Problems and Evidence,” 86 American Journal of Sociology 869.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1982) Capital Punishment, 1981. Washington, DC: Department of Justice National Prisoner Statistics NCJ-78600.Google Scholar
WOLFGANG, Marvin E., Arlene, KELLY and Hans C., NOLDE (1962) “Comparisons of the Executed and Commuted among Admissions to Death Row,” 53 Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 301.Google Scholar
WOLFGANG, Marvin E. and Marc, RIEDEL (1973) “Race, Judicial Discretion, and the Death Penalty,” 53 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 301.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 485 (1977).Google Scholar
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980).Google Scholar
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).Google Scholar
McCleskey v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 877 (1985).Google Scholar
Spinkellink v. State, 313 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1975).Google Scholar