Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:55:15.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Trends in the Development of Labor Law in the Federal Republic of Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Extract

Ernst Benda. Sozialrechtliche Eigentumspositionen im Arbeitskampf: Ein Beitrag zur Diskussion um die Änderung des § 116 Arbeitsförderungsgesetz (The guarantee of private property and its extension on claims based on social security law in situations of industrial action: A contribution to the discussion on the amendment of section 116 of the Employment Promotion Act). (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1986).

Manfred Bobke and Herbert Grimberg. Der gewerkschaftliche Warnstreik im Arbeitskampfrecht: “Neue Beweglichkeit” gegen rechtliche Begrenzungen der gewerkschaftlichen Handlungsfreiheit (The warning strike organized by trade unions as reflected in the law on industrial conflict: “New mobility” against legal limitations of trade unions' freedom). (Cologne: Bund, 1983).

Volker Jahnke. Tarifautonomie und Mitbestimmung (Freedom of collective bargaining and codetermination). (Munich: Beck, 1984).

Volkhart Kriebel. Zentralisation und Dezentralisation im Tarifsystem: Möglichkeit und rechtliche Zulässigkeit einer dezentralen Tarifpolitik (Centralization and decentralization in the system of collective bargaining: Factual and legal possibility of a decentralized collective bargaining policy). (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1984).

Fritz Ossenbühl and Reinhard Richardi. Neutralität im Arbeitskampf (Neutrality in industrial conflict). (Cologne: Heymanns, 1987).

Eduard Picker. Der Warnstreik und die Funktion des Arbeitskampfes in der Privatrechtsordnung (The warning strike and the function of industrial action in the system of civil law). (Cologne: Heymanns, 1983).

Ulrich Runggaldier. Kollektivvertragliche Mitbestimmung bei Arbeitsorganisation und Rationalisierung (Codetermination of work organization and rationalization by collective agreements). (Frankfurt: Metzner, 1983).

The economic crisis of the 1970s and early 1980s has led to a continuous questioning of established patterns of labor law in the Federal Republic of Germany. Until the mid-1970s full employment was one of the basic characteristics of the German labor market. Since then, an unemployment rate of approximately 10 percent has become part of the picture. In spite of the fact that the economy has recovered to a great degree, unemployment persists. Evidently, economic growth by itself does not imply job creation, and rationalization has become the key word of management policy. Since economic growth is more easily reached by new technologies than by the use of more manpower, job security is endangered irrespective of economic prosperity. In order to remain competitive in the world market, German companies have no choice but to reduce costs and to increase productivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Federal Labour Court; decision of 17 December 1976, EzA, Artikel 9 Grundgesetz, number 19, pp. 119–125 (121).

2 Federal Labour Court, decision of 12 September 1984 EzA, Artikel 9 Grundgestetz, number 54, pp. 593–629, and Federal Labour Court, decision of 29 January 1985, EzA, Artikel 9 Grundgesetz, number 56, pp. 635–640.

3 Federal Labour Court, decisions of 22 December 1980, EzA § 515 Burgerliches Gesetzbuch—Betriebsrisiko-, number 7 and 8, pp. 29–62.

4 Appellate Social Security Court of Hesse, decision of 22 June 1984, NZA, 1984, pp. 100–103, and Appellate Social Security Court of Bremen, decision of 22 June 1984, NZA, 1984, pp. 132–136.