No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Law & Society Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Longitudinal Studies of Trial Courts , 1990 , pp. 617 - 643
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1990 The Law and Society Association.
References
ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
ABROMOWITZ, David (1982) “Past Claimant as Future Victim: Commercial Retaliation and the Erosion of Court Access,” 17 Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Law Review 209.Google Scholar
ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. (1984) “Structural Analysis: Some Notes on Its History and Prospects,” 25 Sociological Quarterly 5.Google Scholar
ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C., and Bernhard, GIESEN (1987) “From Reduction to Linkage: The Long View of the Micro-Macro Debate,” in Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., and Smelser, N. J. (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
ALFORD, Robert R., and Roger, FRIEDLAND (1985) Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALLEN, Michael (1987) “Cleaning House: U.S. Companies Pay Increasing Attention to Destroying Files,” Wall Street Journal, 2 September, p. 1.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1979) “Plea Bargaining and Its History,” 79 Columbia Law Review 1.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1976) “The Trial Judge's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 76 Columbia Law Review 1059.Google Scholar
ALTERNATIVES to the High Cost of Litigation (1988), “The Manville Asbestos Trust,” 6 Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 1.Google Scholar
AMENTA, Edwin, CLEMENS, Elizabeth S., OLSEN, Jefren, PARIKH, Sunita, and Theda, SKOCPOL (1987) The Political Origins of Unemployment Insurance in Five American States. Studies in American Political Development: An Annual, Vol. 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE (1934) A Study of the Business of the Federal Courts, Part I: Criminal Cases. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
ARON, Raymond (1967) Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Vol. 2. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
AYERS, Edward L. (1984) Vengeance and Justice: Crime and Punishment in the Nineteenth Century American South. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BALBUS, Isaac D. (1973) The Dialectics of Legal Repression: Black Rebels Before the American Criminal Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
BARNETT, Harold C. (1981) “Corporate Capitalism, Corporate Crime,” 27 Crime and Delinquency 4.Google Scholar
BAUM, Lawrence, Sheldon, GOLDMAN, and Austin, SARAT (1981–82) “Research Note: The Evolution of Litigation in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1895–1975,” 16 Law & Society Review 291.Google Scholar
BAUMGARTNER, Mary Patricia (1988) The Moral Order of a Suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BAUMGARTNER, Mary Patricia (1984) “Social Control in Suburbia,” in Black, Donald (ed.) Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Vol. 2. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BEAN, Ed (1986) “After 137 People Died in Its Texas Jet Crash, Delta Helped Families,” Wall Street Journal, 7 November, p. 1.Google Scholar
BELKIN, Lisa (1987) “Roles and Dollars at Stake in Soap-Opera Cliff-hangers,” New York Times, 28 April, p. C-18.Google Scholar
BELL, C., and C., PRICE (1982) “Running for Judge in California: Superior Court Elections, 1978–1980,” 6 California Data Brief 1.Google Scholar
BELLUCK, Pam (1985) “Tenants Cry Foul as Screening Companies Help Landlords Spot ‘Problem’ Applicants,” Wall Street Journal, 27 December, p. 11.Google Scholar
BENDIX, Reinhardt, and Guenther, ROTH (1971) Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERG, GERARD P. VAN DEN (1985) The Soviet System of Justice: Figures and Policy. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERGSTROM, Randolph E. (1988) “Courting Danger: Injury Suits in New York City, 1870–1910.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Law & Society Association, Vail, Colorado.Google Scholar
BERK, Richard A., MESSINGER, Sheldon L., RAUMA, David, & John E., BERECOCHEA (1983) “Prisons as Self-regulating Systems: A Comparison of Historical Patterns in California for Male and Female Offenders,” 17 Law & Society Review 547.Google Scholar
BEST, Arthur, and Allan R., ANDREASEN (1977) “Consumer Responses to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints and Obtaining Redress,” 11 Law & Society Review 701.Google Scholar
BIDERMAN, A. D., and A. J., REISS Jr. (1967) “On Exploring the ‘Dark Figure’ of Crime,” 374 The Annals 1.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1980) The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1971) “The Social Organization of Arrest,” 23 Stanford Law Review 1087.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald J. (1970) “Production of Crime Rates,” 35 American Sociological Review 733.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard (ed.) (1989) Prozessflut? Studien zur Prozesstätigkeit europäischer Gerichte in historischen Zeitreihen und im Rechtsvergleich. Cologne: Bundesanzeiger.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard (ed.) (1975) “Studying the Frequency of Civil Litigation in Germany,” 9 Law & Society Review 307.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari (1990) “Commercial Relations, Contract and Litigation in Denmark: A Discussion of Macaulay's Theories,” 24 Law & Society Review 397.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari (1987) “Rationalitet og irrationalitet som basis for beslutning og handling i organisation,” in Blegvad, Britt-Mari and Finn, Colin (eds.), Virksomheden Mellem Okonomi og jura—om retsokonomi og styring. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari (1986) “Report to the Danish Research Council with Three Case Studies.” Unpublished report of the Institute of Organization and Industrial Sociology, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari (1983) “Sweeping Little Injustices Under the Carpet: A Case Study of Consumer Dispute Treatment and Norm Generation,” Working Paper 1983-8 of the Dispute Processing Research Program, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari, BOLDING, P. O., and Ole, LANDO, in cooperation with Kirsten, GAMST-NIELSEN (1973) Arbitration as a Means of Solving Conflicts. Copenhagen: New Social Science Monographs.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari, and Nell, RASMUSSEN (1975) “The Lay Judges of the Danish Maritime and Commercial Court.” Research Report of the Institute of Organization and Industrial Sociology, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari, Valdemar, THOMSEN, and Annegrete, WULFF (1981) Forbrugerklageorganer i organisationssociologisk perspektiv, Vols. 1 and 2. Research Report of the Institute of Organization and Industrial Sociology, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari, and Annegrete, WULFF (1989) “Prozessflut aller Orten? Danemark: Ein Gegenbefund und seine Ursachen,” in Blankenburg, E. (ed.), Prozessflut? Studien zur Prozesstätigkeit europäischer Gerichte in historischen Zeitreihen und im Rechtsvergleich. Bonn: Bundesanzeiger.Google Scholar
BLEGVAD, Britt-Mari, and Annegrete, WULFF (1984) “The Alleged Litigation Explosion: Danish Data.” Presented at the Conference on Litigation, Gummersbach, West Germany (Theodor Heuss Academie).Google Scholar
BLOCK, Fred (1977) “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of State,” 7 Socialist Revolution 6.Google Scholar
BLUM, Andrew (1990) “Law Firm Gets Involved in Tobacco Debate,” National Law Journal, Mar. 19, p. 14.Google Scholar
BLUME, Lawrence E., and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1982) “The Dynamics of the Legal Process,” 11 Journal of Legal Studies 405.Google Scholar
BOGUE, Allan (1963) From Prairie to Corn Belt: Farming on the Illinois and Iowa Prairies in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1967a) “Introduction,” in Bohannan, Paul (ed.), Law and Warfare: Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1967b) The Differing Realms of the Law,“ in Bohannan, Paul (ed.), Law and Warfare: Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
BONAFÉ-SCHMITT, Jean-Pierre (1986) “Les justices du quotidient.” Rapport de Recherche, document GLYSI no. 1/86.Google Scholar
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1987) “The Force of Law: Toward Sociology of the Juridical Field,” 38 Hastings Law Journal 201.Google Scholar
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOYUM, Keith O. (1983) “The Etiology of Claims: Sketches for a Theoretical Mapping of the Claim-Definition Process,” in Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. new York: Longman.Google Scholar
BOYUM, Keith, and Lynn, MATHER (1983) Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
BRAEUTIGAM, Ronald, OWEN, Bruce M., and John, PANZAR (1984) “An Economic Analysis of Alternative Fee Schifting Systems,” 47 Law and Contemporary Problems 173.Google Scholar
BREYER, Stephen (1982) Regulation and Its Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BREYER, Stephen, and Richard, STEWART (1985) Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
BRICKEY, Stephen L., and Dan E., MILLER (1975) “Bureaucratic Due Process: An Ethnography of a Traffic Court,” 22 Social Problems 688.Google Scholar
BRIGHAM, John (1985) “Judicial Impact upon Social Problems: A Perspective on Ideology,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 47.Google Scholar
BRODEUR, Paul (1985) Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
BROOKS, C. W. (1978) “Litigants and Attorneys in the King's Bench and Common Pleas,” in Baker, J. H. (ed.), Legal Records and the Historian: Papers Presented to the Cambridge Legal History Conference. London: Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
BUCKLE, L. G., and Susan R., THOMAS-BUCKLE (1982) “Doing unto Others: Disputes and Dispute Processing in an Urban American Neighborhood,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice: Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
BURBANK, Stephen (1982) “The Rules Enabling Act of 1934,” 120 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1015.Google Scholar
BURSTEIN, Paul (1987) “Race, Religion, Sex and National Origin: Barriers to Mobility in the American Labor Market, 1965–1985.” Presented at the Conference on Longitudinal Research on Trial Courts, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
BURSTEIN, Paul, and Kathleen, MONAGHAN (1986) “Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilizing of Law,” 20 Law & Society Review 355.Google Scholar
BURGER, Warren (1970) “The State of the Judiciary: 1970,” 56 American Bar Association Journal 929.Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen, and Kalman, KULCSAR (1981–82) “Thinking Disputes: An Essay on the Origins of the Dispute Industry,” 16 Law & Society Review 375.Google Scholar
CALAVITA, Kitty (1983) “The Demise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: A Case Study in Symbolic Action,” 30 Social Problems 437.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Ballard C. (1980) Representative Democracy: Public Policy and Midwestern Legislatures in the Late Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro, and Joseph M., PERILLO (1965) Civil Procedure in Italy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
CARNOY, Martin (1984) The State and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CARTER, Terry (1988) “Let 1,000 Asbestos Suits Bloom,” National Law Journal, 26 December, p. 2.Google Scholar
CARTWRIGHT, Bliss (1975) “Conclusion: Disputes and Reported Cases,” 9 Law & Society Review 369.Google Scholar
CASPER, Gerhard, and Richard A., POSNER (1974) “Study of the Supreme Court's Caseload,” 3 Journal of Legal Studies 339.Google Scholar
CHAYES, Abram (1976) “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1281.Google Scholar
CHERNIACK, Martin (1986) The Hawk's Nest Incident: America's Worst Industrial Disaster. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
CHIN, Audrey, and Mark A., PETERSON (1985) Deep Pockets, Empty Pockets? Who Wins in Cook County Jury Trials. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
CHURCH, Thomas W. (1982) Examining Local Legal Culture: Practitioner Attitudes in Four Criminal Courts. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
CICOUREL, Aaron V. (1968) The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
CIPOLLA, Carlo M. (1976) “Introduction,” in Cipolla, Carlo M. (ed.), The Fontana Economic History of Europe, Vol. 3. New York: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
CLAGGETT, William (1986) “Walter Dean Burnham and the Dynamics of American Politics,” 10 Social Science History 205.Google Scholar
CLARK, David S. (1990) “Civil Litigation Trends in Europe and Latin America Since 1945: The Advantage of Intra-Country Comparisons,” 24 Law & Society Review 549.Google Scholar
CLARK, David S. (1988) “Civil Litigation, Access to Justice, and Social Change: Research Issues in Longitudinal Court Studies,” 12 Southern Illinois University Law Journal 713.Google Scholar
CLARK, David S. (1981) “Adjudication to Administration: A Statistical Analysis of Federal District Courts in the Twentieth Century,” 55 Southern California Law 65.Google Scholar
CLEARY, Edward (1984) McCormick on Evidence. 3d ed. St. Paul, MN.: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
CLENDINEN, Dudley (1986) “Doctors in Georgia City Strike Back Over Suits,” New York Times, 14 May, p. 1.Google Scholar
CLOUGH, Shephard B., and Richard T., RAPP (1975) European Economic History: The Economic Development of Western Civilization. 3d ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
COATES, Dan, and Steven, PENROD (1980–81) “Social Psychology and the Emergence of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 655.Google Scholar
COFFEE, John C. Jr. (1987) “The Regulation of Entrepreneurial Litigation: Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in the Large Class Action,” 54 University of Chicago Law Review 877.Google Scholar
COFFEE, John C. Jr. (1986) “Understanding the Plaintiff's Attorney: The Implications of Economic Theory for Private Enforcement of the Law Through Class and Derivative Actions,” 86 Columbia Law Review 669.Google Scholar
COHEN, Laurie P. (1990) “Broader Suits Over Cigarettes May Be Possible,” Wall Street Journal, 1 August, p. 10.Google Scholar
COHN, Bernard S. (1976) “Some Notes of Law and Change in Northern India,” in Bohannan, Paul (ed.), Law and Warfare: Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
COLEMAN, James S. (1987) “Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior,” in Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giessen, Bernhard, Munch, Richard, and Smelser, Neil (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
COLEMAN, James S. (1986) “Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action,” 91 American Journal of Sociology 1309.Google Scholar
COLLIER, Jane F. (1973) Law and Social Change in Zinacantan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
COMAROFF, John L., and Simon A., ROBERTS (1977) “The Invocation of Norms in Dispute Settlement,” in Hamnett, I. (ed.), Social Anthropology and Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
COMMAILLE, Jacques, FESTY, Patrick, GUIBENTIF, Pierre, KELLERHALS, Jean, PERRIN, Jean Francois, and Louis, ROUSSEL (1983) Le divorce en Europe occidentale: La loi et le nombre. Geneva: CETEL.Google Scholar
COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS (1975) Standards of Judicial Practices: The Complaint Procedure. Boston: Administrative Offices of the District Court.Google Scholar
COOK, Beverly Blair (1973) “Sentencing Behavior of Federal Judges: Draft Cases—1972,” 42 University of Cincinnati Law Review 597.Google Scholar
COOPER, Alan (1988) “It's Over: Robins Plan Gets the Nod,” National Law Journal, August 10, p. 10.Google Scholar
COOPER, Jeremy (1981) “Legal Service in Three Countries: A Study of the Relationship Between Policy and Practice.” Ph.D. dissertation, Florence European University Institute.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert (1987) “Why Litigants Disagree: Comment on Priest's ‘Measuring Legal Change’,” 3 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 227.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert (1983) “The Objectives of Private and Public Judges,” 41 Public Choice 107.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert, and KORNHAUSER, Lewis (1980) “Can Litigation Improve the Law Without the Help of Judges?” 9 Journal of Legal Studies 139.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert, and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1990) “Trial Courts: An Economic Perspective,” 24 Law & Society Review 533.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert, and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1989) “The Economics of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution,” 27 Journal of Economic Literature 1067.Google Scholar
COOTER, Robert, and Thomas, UHLEN (1986) “An Economic Case for Comparative Negligence,” 61 New York University Law Review 1067.Google Scholar
COSER, Lewis A. (1971) Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
CUMMINGS, Homer, and McFARLAND, Carl (1937) Federal Justice: Chapters in the History of Justice and the Federal Executive. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
CURTIS, George B. (1977) “The Colonial County Court, Social Forum and Legislative Precedent, Accomack County Virginia, 1633–1636,” 85 Virginia Magazine of History and Biology 274.Google Scholar
DAINTITH, T. C. (1988) “Contract Design and Practice in the Natural Resources Sector,” 1988 European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 193.Google Scholar
DAINTITH, T. C. (1986) “The Design and Performance of Long-Term Contracts,” in Daintith, T. C. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAM, Kenneth (1975) “Class Actions: Efficiency, Compensation, Deterrence and Conflicts of Interest,” 4 Journal of Legal Studies 47.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1990) “Caseload Dynamics and the Nature of Change: The Civil Business of Trial Courts in Four Illinois Counties,” 24 Law & Society Review 299.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1988) “A Tangled Tale: Studying State Supreme Courts,” 22 Law & Society Review 833.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1986) “Explaining Case Load Dynamics: The Use of Evolutionary Models.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1985) “Continuity and Change in Patterns of Case Handling: A Case Study of Two Rural Counties,” 19 Law & Society Review 381.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1984) “Ladders and Bushes: The Problem of Caseloads and Studying Court Activities Over Time,” 1984 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 751.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1982) “Civil Litigation in Illinois Trial Courts: An Exploration of Rural-Urban Differences,” 4 Law and Policy Quarterly 190.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1981) “The Trial Courts of Spoon River: Patterns and Change, 1870 to 1963.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Stephen (1980) “Patterns and Changes in Illinois Trial Courts.” Proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
DANMARK STATISTIK (1971–86) “Statistisk Arbog, Danmark.” Unpublished statistical series.Google Scholar
DANZIG, Richard, and Michael J., LOWY (1975) “Everyday Disputes and Mediation in the U.S.: A Reply to Professor Felstiner,” 9 Law & Society Review 675.Google Scholar
DANZON, Patricia Munch (1983) “Contingent Fees for Personal Injury Litigation,” 14 Bell Journal of Economics 213.Google Scholar
DAVIS, Martha (1985) “Defend Thyself: How Doctors Are Protecting Themselves from Malpractice Suits,” Chicago Magazine, 149 (October).Google Scholar
DAVIS, Natalie Zemon (1975) “Strikes and Salvation at Lyon,” in Society and Culture in Early Modern France: Eight Essays. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
DENZAU, Arthur (1979) “Litigation Expenditures as Private Determinants of Judicial Decisions: A Comment,” 8 Journal of Legal Studies 295.Google Scholar
DENZIN, Norman (1970) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
DEPARTAMIENTO ADMINISTRATIVO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA (1981–86) Colombia Estadística. Bogota: DANE.Google Scholar
DEVLIN, Rose Anne (1989) “Some Welfare Implications of No-Fault Automobile Insurance.” Draft, University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
DIAMOND, Stephen (1983) “The Death and Transfiguration of Benefit Taxation: Special Assessments in Nineteenth-Century America,” 12 Journal of Legal Studies 201.Google Scholar
DICKINSON, John A. (1976) “L'activite judiciaire d'apres la procedure civile. Le bailliage de Falaise, 1688–1790,” 84 Revue d'histoire economique et sociale 145.Google Scholar
DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Y CENSOS (1974–85) Annuario Estadístico de Costa Rica. San José, Costa Rica: DGEC.Google Scholar
DOUGHERTY, Kevin (1986) “The State-Manager Theory of the State: A Critique and Reformulation.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
DOUGLAS, Jack D. (1967) The Social Meanings of Suicide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DUNCAN, Otis Dudley (1984) Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
DUNGWORTH, Terrance (1988) Product Liability and the Business Sector: Litigation Trends in Federal Courts. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Emile [1895] (1964b) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, Ronald (1977) “The Model of Rules,” in Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
EADS, George, and Reuter, Peter (1983) Designing Safer Products: Corporate Responses to Product Liability Law and Regulation. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
EASTERBROOK, Frank H (1982) “Ways of Criticizing the Court,” 95 Harvard Law Review 802.Google Scholar
EASTERBROOK, Frank H (1984) “The Supreme Court, 1983 Term—Foreword: The Court and The Economic System,” 98 Harvard Law Review 4.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
EDWARDS, Ward, and Amos, TVERSKY (eds.) (1967) Decision Making. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
EISENBERG, Theodore (1982) “Section 1983: Doctrinal Foundations and an Empirical Study,” 67 Cornell Law Review 482.Google Scholar
EISENBERG, Theodore, and Stewart J., SCHWAB (1987) “The Reality of Constitutional Tort Litigation,” 72 Cornell Law Review 64.Google Scholar
ELAZAR, Daniel Judah (1962) The American Partnership: Intergovernmental Co-operation in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
EMERSON, Robert M. (1983) “Holistic Effects in Social Control Decisionmaking,” 17 Law & Society Review 425.Google Scholar
EMERSON, Haven (1941) Population, Births, Notifiable Diseases, and Deaths, Assembled for New York City, New York: 1866–1938. New York: DeLamar Institute of Public Health, Columbia University.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1990) “Litigation Across Space and Time: Courts, Conflict and Social Change,” 24 Law & Society Review 333.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1985) “Review of Empirical Theories About Courts,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 101.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1984) “The Ovenbird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders,” 18 Law & Society Review 101.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1980) “Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court,” 1980 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 425.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1978) Code and Custom in a Thai Provincial Court: The Interactions of Formal and Informal Systems of Justice. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
FALLERS, Lloyd A. (1969) Law Without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
FEDDERS, John M., and Lauryn H., GUTTENPLAN (1980) “Documents Retention and Destruction: Practical, Legal and Ethical Considerations,” 56 Notre Dame Lawyer 5.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm M. (1979). The Process Is the Punishment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. (1975) “Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration,” 9 Law & Society Review 695.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F., Richard, ABEL, and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming ...,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FESTY, Patrick, and Marie-France, VALETAS (1986a) Le paiement des pensions alimentaires aux femmes divorces: Rapport preliminaire. Paris: INED.Google Scholar
FESTY, Patrick, and Marie-France, VALETAS (1986b) “Quelques variables associés au montant et au paiement des pensions alimentaires.” Unpublished paper, INED, Paris.Google Scholar
FIENBERG, S. E., M. E., MARTIN, and M. L., STRAFF (1985) Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
FINKELSTEIN, Michael O. (1975) “A Statistical Analysis of Guilty Plea Practices in the Federal Courts,” 89 Harvard Law Review 293.Google Scholar
FITZGERALD, Jeffrey, and Richard, DICKINS (1980–81) “Disputing in Legal and Non-legal Contexts: Some Questions for Sociologists of Law,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FLANAGAN, Robert J. (1987) Labor Relations and the Litigation Explosion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michael (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michael (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
FRANKFURTER, Felix, and Thomas G., CORCORAN (1926) “Petty Federal Offenses and the Constitutional Guaranty of Trial by Jury,” 39 Harvard Law Review 917.Google Scholar
FRANKFURTER, Felix, and James M., LANDIS (1927) The Business of the Supreme Court: A Study in the Federal Judicial System. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
FREIDSON, Eliot (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
FREUDENHEIM, Milt (1988) “Dalkon Shield Trust Fund Organizes,” New York Times, 23 August, p. 23.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1990a) “Opening the Time Capsule: A Progress Report on Studies of Courts Over Time,” 24 Law & Society Review 229.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1990b) The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority and Culture. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1989a) “Litigation and Its Discontents,” 40 Mercer Law Review 973.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1989b) “Litigation and Society,” 15 Annual Review of Sociology 17.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1987) “Civil Wrongs: Personal Injury Law in the Late 19th Century,” 1987 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 351.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1984) “American Legal History: Past and Present,” 34 Journal of Legal Education 563.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1983) “Courts over Time: A Survey of Theories and Research,” in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1979) “Plea Bargaining in Historical Perspective,” 13 Law & Society Review 247.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1976) “Trial Courts and Their Work in the Modern World,” 4 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie and Rechtstheorie 25.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1975) “San Benito 1890: Legal Snapshot of a County,” 27 Stanford Law Review 687.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1969) “Legal Culture and Social Development,” 4 Law & Society Review 29.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1967) “Legal Rules and the Process of Social Change,” 19 Stanford Law Review 786.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1965) Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., KAGAN, Robert R., CARTWRIGHT, Bliss, and Stanton, WHEELER (1981) “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation,” 33 Stanford Law Review 773.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Jack, LADINSKY (1967) “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents,” 67 Columbia Law Review 50.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Robert, PERCIVAL (1981) The Roots of Justice: Crime and Punishment in Alameda County, California, 1870–1910. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Robert, PERCIVAL (1976a) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Robert, PERCIVAL (1976b) “Who Sues for Divorce? From Fault Through Fiction to Freedom,” 5 Journal of Legal Studies 61.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M., and Manfred, REHBINDER, (eds.) (1976) “Sociologie des Gerichtsverfahrens,” 4 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 25.Google Scholar
FRIENDLY, Henry (1973) Federal Jurisdiction: A General View. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1934) “American Legal Realism,” 82 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 429.Google Scholar
GALAMBOS, Louis (1983) “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis,” 57 Business History Review 471.Google Scholar
GALANTE, Mary Ann (1985) “Doctors, Attorneys Feud Over ‘Hotlines’ in California,” National Law Journal, 2 December, p. 9.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1990) “Case Congregations and Their Careers,” 24 Law & Society Review 371.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1986a) “Adjudication, Litigation, and Related Phenomena,” in Lipson, Leon and Wheeler, Stanton (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1986b) “The Day After the Litigation Explosion,” 46 Maryland Law Review 3.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1985a) “Lawyers' Litigation Networks.” Presented to the Conference on the Frontiers of Research on Litigation, Madison.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1985b) “Vision and Revision: A Comment on Yngvesson,” 1985 Wisconsin Law Review 647.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983a) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 UCLA Law Review 4.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983b) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1979) “Legality and Its Discontents: A Preliminary Assessment of Current Theories of Legalization and Delegalization,” in Blankenburg, E., Klausa, E., and Rottleuthner, H. (eds.) Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht. Bonn: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974a) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974b) “Afterword: Explaining Litigation,” 9 Law & Society Review 347.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc, and Joel, ROGERS (1988) “The Transformation of American Business Disputing: Some Preliminary Observations.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Vail, CO.Google Scholar
GANS, Alfred W., and Paul D., RHEINGOLD (1984) [1960] “Multiple Litigation,” in Frumer, Louis R. and Friedman, Melvin I. (eds.), Products Liability, Vol. 3A. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
GEERTZ, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GEIS, Gilbert (1967) “The Heavy Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases of 1961,” in Clinard, M. and Quinney, R. (eds.), Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
GERE, Edwin A. (1982) “Dillon's Rule and the Cooley Doctrine: Reflections of the Political Culture,” 8 Journal of Urban History 271.Google Scholar
GIBBS, Jack P. (1975) Crime, Punishment and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1971) Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim, and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIFFORD, Donald G., and David J., NYE (1987) “Litigation Trends in Florida: Saga of a Growth State,” 39 University of Florida Law Review 829.Google Scholar
GILES, Michael W., and Thomas D., LANCASTER (1989) “Political Transition, Social Development and Legal Mobilization in Spain,” 83 American Political Science Review 817.Google Scholar
GIVELBER, Daniel J., BOWERS, William J., and Carolyn L., BLITCH (1984) “Tarasoff, Myth and Reality: An Empirical Study of Private Law in Action,” 1984 Wisconsin Law Review 443.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1955) The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
GOLEMAN, Daniel (1987) “When Do a Therapist's Actions Cross Over the Line?” New York Times, 19 November, p. 16.Google Scholar
GOODMAN, John (1978) “An Economic Theory of the Evolution of the Common Law,” 7 Journal of Legal Studies 393.Google Scholar
GORDON, Robert (1984a) “Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870–1920,” in Geison, Gerald (ed.), Professions and Professional Ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
GOULD, Stephen Jay (1982) “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” in Smith, John M. (ed.), Evolution Now: A Century After Darwin. New York: W. H. Freeman Press.Google Scholar
GOULD, Stephen Jay, and Niles, ELDREDGE (1977) “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered,” 3 Paleobiology 115.Google Scholar
GRAHAM, Fred (1970) The Due-Process Revolution: The Warren Court's Impact on Criminal Law. New York: Hayden Book Co.Google Scholar
GRAYSTON, Richard W. (1973) “Deterrence in Automobile Liability Insurance—The Empirical Evidence,” 40 Insurance Counsel Journal 117.Google Scholar
GREEN, Thomas (1985) Verdict According to Conscience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GREEN, William (1987) “Natural Gas Policy Act in the Federal Courts: Judicial Policymaking 1978–1987.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
GREENHOUSE, Carol J. (1986) Praying for Justice: Faith, Order and Community in an American Town. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
GREENHOUSE, Steven (1985) “Limiting the Auto Giant's Liability,” New York Times, 15 December, p. F(6).Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, John (1986) “What Is Legal Pluralism?” 24 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Annotated 1.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B., KRITZER, Herbert M., BUMILLER, Kristin, McDOUGAL, Stephen, MILLER, Richard, and Austin, SARAT (1982) “Dimensions of Institutional Participation: Who Uses the Courts and How?” 44 Journal of Politics 86.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B., and Austin, SARAT (1975) “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective,” 9 Law & Society Review 321.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Philip H. (1979) Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Philip H. (1969a) “Introduction to Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies,” in Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Philip H. (1969b) “Dispute Settlement Without Courts: The Ndendeuli of Southern Tanzania,” in Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, Philip H. (1963) Social Control in an African Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GUTIÉRREZ, Carlos José (1979) El Funcionamiento del Sistema Juridico. San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Juricentro.Google Scholar
HADDOCK, David, and Christopher, CURRAN (1985) “An Economic Theory of Comparative Negligence,” 14 Journal of Legal Studies 49.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John, and Illene Nagel, BERNSTEIN (1979). “The Sentence Bargaining of Upperworld and Underworld Crime in Ten Federal District Courts,” 13 Law & Society Review 467.Google Scholar
HALL, Richard (1987) Organizations: Structures, Processes and Outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
HALL, Richard (1968) “Professionalization and Bureaucratization,” 33 American Sociological Review 92.Google Scholar
HALLER, Mark H. (1979) “Plea Bargaining: The Nineteenth Century Context,” 13 Law & Society Review 273.Google Scholar
HALLER, Mark H. (1970) “Urban Crime and Criminal Justice: The Chicago Case,” 57 Journal of American History 619.Google Scholar
HALLIDAY, T. C. (1986) “Six Score Years and Ten: Demographic Transitions in the American Legal Profession,” 20 Law & Society Review 53.Google Scholar
HAMAGUCHI, Esyun (1985) “A Contextual Model of the Japanese: Toward a Methodological Innovation in Japanese Studies,” 11 Journal of Japanese Studies 289.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel F. (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HARDING, Sandra (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
HARNO, Albert J. (1928). “The Working of the Parole Board and Its Relation to the Court,” 19 Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 83.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine B. (1988) “Regulatory Reform: Creating Gaps and Making Markets,” 10 Law & Policy 19.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine B. (1985) “Socio-legal Concepts in Mediation Ideology,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 33.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine B., and Sally Engle, MERRY (1988) “Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation,” 22 Law & Society Review 709.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Roy J. Jr. (1980) “Insurers Now Settle Faster, More Cheaply After Big Air Crashes,” Wall Street Journal, 11 July, p. 1.Google Scholar
HARTOG, Hendrik (1976) “The Public Law of a County Court: Judicial Government in Eighteenth Century Massachusetts,” 20 American Journal of Legal History 282.Google Scholar
HARVEY, A. C. (1981) The Econometric Analysis of Time Series. Oxford: Philip Allan Publishers.Google Scholar
HARVEY, David (1976) “Labor, Capital, and Class Struggle Around the Build Environment of Advanced Capitalist Societies,” 6 Politics and Society 625.Google Scholar
HAYEK, Friedrich A. (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
HEINZ, John P., and Edward O., LAUMANN (1983) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
HENDERSON, James A. Jr., and Eisenberg, Theodore (1990) “The Quiet Revolution in Products Liability: An Empirical Study of Legal Change,” 37 UCLA Law Review 479.Google Scholar
HENNING, Friedrich-Wilhelm (1985) Wirtschafts-und Sozialgeschichte, Vol. 1: Das vorindustrielle Deutschland, 800 bis 1800. 4th ed. Paderborn: Schoningh.Google Scholar
HENSLER, Deborah R., FELSTINER, William L. F., SELVIN, Molly, and Patricia A., EBENER (1985) Asbestos in the Courts: The Challenge of Mass Toxic Torts. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1978) Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1975) “A Note on Plea Bargaining and Case Pressure,” 9 Law & Society Review 515.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf (1990) “Government Litigation and National Policy Making: From Roosevelt to Reagan,” 24 Law & Society Review 477.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf (1983) “Technocratic Corporatism: Toward a Theory of Occupational and Organizational Transformation,” in Hall, R. and Quinn, R. (eds.), Organizational Theory and Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf (1979) “The Technocratic Administration of Justice,” 2 Research in Law & Sociology 29.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf (1977) “The Context of Public Bureaucracies: An Organizational Analysis of Federal District Courts,” 11 Law & Society Review 759.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf (1973) Comparative Organizations: The Results of Empirical Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf, and Carroll, SERON (1990) Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of Federal District Courts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf, and Carroll, SERON (1987) “The Organizational Structure of Courts: Toward the Technocratic Administration of Justice,” 2 International Review of Sociology 63.Google Scholar
HEYDEBRAND, Wolf, and Carroll, SERON (1986) “The Rising Demand for Court Services: A Structural Explanation of the Caseload of U.S. District Courts,” 11 Justice System Journal 303.Google Scholar
HIEMSCH, Jan (1964) Die bremische Gerichtsverfassung von der ersten Gerichtsordnung bis zur Reichsjustizgesetzgebung 1751–1879. Bremen: Schuenemann.Google Scholar
HIGGINS, Richard S., and Paul H., RUBIN (1980) “Judicial Discretion,” 9 Journal of Legal Studies 129.Google Scholar
HINDUS, Michael S., HAMMETT, Theodore M., and Barbara M., HOBSON (1979) The Files of the Massachusetts Superior Court, 1859–1959: An Analysis and a Plan for Action. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Elizabeth, and Matthew, SPITZER (1982) “The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests,” 25 Journal of Law and Economics 73.Google Scholar
HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW (1980) “Symposium on Efficiency as a Legal Concern,” 8(3) Hofstra Law Review.Google Scholar
HOGARTH, Robin M., and Melvin W., REDER (eds.) (1987) Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
HONDRICH, Karl Otto (1987) “Micropathology and Macronormality,” in Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, Munch, Richard, and Smelser, Neil J. (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
HOOKER, M. B. (1975) Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-colonial Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
HORWITZ, Morton J. (1977) The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUNT, Alan (1978) The Sociological Movement in Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1980–81) “The Functions of Courts in the United States: 1950–1980,” 15 Law & Society Review 401.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1964) Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836–1916. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1959) “Introduction,” in Francis W. Laurent, The Business of a State Trial Court. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1956) Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1950) The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
IETSWAART, Heleen F. P. (1990) “The International Comparison of Court Caseloads: The Experience of the European Working Group,” 24 Law & Society Review 571.Google Scholar
IETSWAART, Heleen F. P. (1987) “Problems of the International Comparison of Court Caseloads.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
IETSWAART, Heleen F. P. (1986a) “L'évolution du contentieux civil aux tribunaux d'instance, 1970–1984,” Rapport de Recherche, CRIV/CAFI, Paris.Google Scholar
IETSWAART, Heleen F. P. (1986b) “Evolutionary Trends in Litigation in French County Courts, 1970–1984, or, May Litigation Be Compared Cross-nationally?” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
IETSWAART, Heleen F. P. (1984) “Court Caseloads and What They Can Tell Us About Litigation and Litigiousness: The Case of France, 1971–1981.” Presented at the Conference on Litigation, Gummersbach, West Germany (Theodor Heuss Academie).Google Scholar
ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE (1929) The Illinois Crime Survey. Chicago: Blakely Printing Co.Google Scholar
ILLINOIS, CRIMINAL COURT OF COOK COUNTY (1926) In Re Investigation of Charges of the Chicago Crime Commission and Frank J. Loesch. Chicago: Gunthorp-Warren.Google Scholar
ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW (1936) “Legislative Abolition of Certain Actions Designed to Protect the Family Relation,” 20 Illinois Law Review 764.Google Scholar
INDIANAPOLIS NEWS (1935) “Aching Hearts Are Itching Palms, Says Woman Legislator as Men Gallantly Pass ‘Love Bill’,” Indianapolis News, 1 February, p. 1.Google Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA (1987) 45 Anuario Estadistico de Espana, Ano 1987. [Manual] Madrid: INE.Google Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA (1950–54, 1987) 25–29, 61 Anuario Estadistico de Espana. Madrid: INE.Google Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA (1986) 63 Boletin de Estadisticas (Jan.–Feb., No. 457). Madrid: INE.Google Scholar
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA (1959–87) Estadisticas Judiciales de Espana. Madrid: INE.Google Scholar
ISTITUT CENTRALE DI STATISTICA (1973–84) 20–29 Annuario de Statistiche Giudiziarie. Rome: ICS.Google Scholar
ISTITUT CENTRALE DI STATISTICA (1968) Sommario de Statistiche Storiche dell' Italia, 1861–1965. Rome: ICS.Google Scholar
JACKSON, Cindy J. (1983) “A Controversial Settlement Approach: The Alpert Letter,” 49 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 213.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1983a) “Courts as Organizations,” in Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1983b) “Trial Courts in the United States: The Travails of Exploration,” 17 Law & Society Review 407.Google Scholar
JACOBSSON, Bengt (1988) Kraftsamlingen: Politik och Soretigande I Parallella Processer. Lund: Doxa Ekonomi.Google Scholar
JANSON, Donald (1988) “Cigarette Maker Assessed Damages in Smoker's Death,” New York Times, 14 June, p. 1.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Earl Jr. (1980–81) “Lawyers” Choice: A Theoretical Appraisal of Litigation Investment Decisions,“ 15 Law & Society Review 567.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Earl Jr., BLACK, S., DREW, A., FELSTINER, William, HANSEN, E., and G., SABAGH (1977) Comparative Analysis of the Statistical Dimensions of the Justice Systems of Seven Industrial Democracies. A Report Submitted to the National Institute for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Kirk (1985) “Why References Aren't as Often ‘Available on Request’; What Companies Say About Ex-Employees May Spawn a Lawsuit,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, 14 June, p. 4.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, William R. (1978) Schooled Lawyers: A Study in the Clash of Professional Cultures. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Richard L. (1981) Lawsuits and Litigants in Castile, 1500–1700. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A. (1984) “The Routinization of Debt Collection: An Essay on Social Change and Conflict in the Courts,” 18 Law & Society Review 323.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert, CARTWRIGHT, Bliss, FRIEDMAN, Lawrence, and Stanton, WHEELER (1978) “The Evolution of State Supreme Courts,” 76 Michigan Law Review 961.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert, CARTWRIGHT, Bliss, FRIEDMAN, Lawrence, and Stanton, WHEELER (1977) “The Business of State Supreme Courts 1870–1970,” 30 Stanford Law Review 121.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, Daniel, KNETSCH, Jack L., and Richard H., THALER (1987) “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,” in Hogarth, Robin M. and Reder, Melvin W. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos, TVERSKY (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” 47 Econometrica 263.Google Scholar
KAISER, Colin (1980) “The Deflation in the Volume of Litigation at Paris in the Eighteenth Century and the Waning of the Old Judicial Order,” 10 European Studies Review 309.Google Scholar
KAKALIK, James S., EBNER, Patricia A., FELSTINER, William L. F., HAGGSTROM, Gus W., and Michael G., SHAPNLEY (1984) Variation in Asbestos Litigation, Compensation and Expenses. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
KASSERMAN, David Richard (1986) Fall River Outrage: Life, Murder, and Justice in Early Industrial New England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KATZ, Avery (1988) “Judicial Decisionmaking and Litigation Expenditure,” 8 International Review of Law Economics 127.Google Scholar
KELLENBENZ, Hermann (1977) Deutsche Wirtschftsgeschichte, Vol. 1: Vor den Anfangen bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
KELLEY, Robert (1987) “The Westward Movement, Reconceived Within a Transatlantic Framework,” 15 Reviews in American History 213.Google Scholar
KEYES, Charles F. (1977) The Golden Peninsula: Culture and Adaptation in Mainland Southeast Asia. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1983) Connecting Law and Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1980–81) “The End of the Road? Problems in the Analysis of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 717.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1979) “Toward an Integrated Theory of Imposed Law,” in Burman, Sandra B. and Harrell-Bond, Barbara E. (eds.), The Imposition of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1975) “Afterword: Change and Structure in Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 385.Google Scholar
KORNHAUSER, Lewis (1983) “Control of Conflicts of Interest in Class Action Suits,” 41 Public Choice 145.Google Scholar
KORNHAUSER, Lewis, and Lawrence, SAGER (1986) “Unpacking the Court,” 96 Yale Law Journal 82.Google Scholar
KRISLOV, Samuel (1983) “Theoretical Perspectives on Case Load Studies: A Critique and a Beginning,” in Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
KURCZEWSKI, Jacek, and Kazimierz, FRIESKE (1977) “Some Problems in the Legal Regulation of the Activities of Economic Institutions,” 11 Law & Society Review 489.Google Scholar
KURIAN, George Thomas (1987) Encyclopedia of the Third World. 3d ed. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar
LANDES, Elizabeth M. (1982) “Insurance, Liability and Accidents: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Effect of No-Fault Accidents,” 25 Journal of Law and Economics 49.Google Scholar
LANDES, William M., and Richard A., POSNER (1979) “Adjudication as a Private Good,” 8 Journal of Legal Studies 235.Google Scholar
LADINSKY, Jack, and Charles, SUSMILCH (1983) “Major Findings of the Milwaukee Consumer Dispute Study,” in Ray, Larry and Smolover, Deborah (eds.), Consumer Dispute Resolution: Exploring the Alternatives. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. (1979) “Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining,” 13 Law & Society Review 261.Google Scholar
LANGERWERF, Etienne (1978) “De invloed van de industrialisering op de activiteiten van hoven en rechtbanken,” 32 Economisch en Social Tijdschrift 215.Google Scholar
LANGERWERF, Etienne (n.d) “The Conciliation Procedure of Dismissal Cases Before the Belgium Labour Courts: A Historical Analysis.” Unpublished paper, Center for Sociology of Law, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
LANGERWERF, Etienne, and J. VAN, HOUTTE (1979) “Een verklarings-model voor de verschillen in procesvoeringsratio van de burgerlijke Rechtbanken van eerste aanleg,” 24 Tijdschrift voor Sociale Wetenschappen 74.Google Scholar
LANGERWERF, Etienne, and Francis VAN, LOON (1985) “Evolution of Litigation Patterns in Belgium, 1970–1984.” Presented at the World Congress of Sociology of Law, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
LANGERWERF, Etienne, and Francis VAN, LOON (1984) “Evolution of the Activities of the Courts in Belgium from 1970–1980.” Presented at the Conference on Litigation at Gummersbach, West Germany (Theodor Heuss Academie).Google Scholar
LASCH, Christopher (1977) Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
LAURENT, Francis W. (1959) The Business of a Trial Court: 100 Years of Cases. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1988) “Law and Ideology,” 22(4) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1985) Issue on Courts and Legal Change in Historical Perspective. 19(3) Law & Society Review (Thematic issue).Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1980–81) “Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation,” 15(3&4) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1975) “Litigation and Dispute Processing, Part Two,” 9(2) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1974) “Litigation and Dispute Processing, Part One,” 9(1) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LEHMAN, Edward W. (1988) “The Theory of the State Versus the State of Theory,” 53 American Sociological Review 807.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard D. (1990) “Docket Data and ‘Local Knowledge’: Studying the Court and Society Link Over Time,” 24 Law and Society Review 301.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard D. (1989) “The Dynamics of Informal Procedure: The Case of a Public Housing Eviction Board,” 23 Law & Society Review, 347.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard D. (1980–81) “Grievances and Legitimacy: The Beginnings and End of Dispute Settlement,” 15 Law & Society Review 707.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard D. (1978) “More Tales of Two Courts: Exploring Changes in the ‘Dispute Settlement Function’ of Trial Courts,” 13 Law & Society Review 91.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard D. (1966) “Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study: The Control of Plausible Rival Hypotheses,” 1 Law & Society Review 111.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard, and Karl, MONSMA (1988) “Lawyers and Informal Justice: The Case of a Public Housing Eviction Board,” 51 Law and Contemporary Problems 135.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard, and Joseph, SANDERS (1986) An Invitation to Law and Social Science. New York: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEUNG, Kwok, and E. Allan, LIND (1986) “Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences,” 50 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1134.Google Scholar
LEVIN, Martin A. (1971) “Urban Politics and Judicial Behavior,” 1 Journal of Legal Studies 193.Google Scholar
LEWIN, Tamar (1985) “Pharmaceutical Companies Are Hardest Hit,” New York Times, 10 March, p. 1, sec. 3.Google Scholar
LEWIS-BECK, Michael S. (1986) “Interrupted Time Series,” in Berry, William D. and Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (eds.), New Tools for Social Scientists. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
LIEBERMAN, Jethro K. (ed.) (1984) The Role of Courts in American Society: The Final Report of the Council on the Role of Courts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
LINDSEY, Robert (1985) “Businesses Change Ways in Fear of Lawsuits,” Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 20 November, p. 2.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl, and E. Adamson, HOEBEL (1941) The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
LLOYD-BOSTOCK, Sally (1983a) “Fault and Liability for Accidents: The Accident Victim's Perspective,” in Harris, C. (ed.), Compensation for Illness and Injury. Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.Google Scholar
LLOYD-BOSTOCK, Sally (1983b) “Attributions of Cause and Responsibility as Social Phenomena,” in Jaspars, Jos, Fincham, Frank D., and Hewstone, Miles (eds.), Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
LORCH, Robert S. (1969) Democratic Process and Administrative Law. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
LOWENTHAL, Max (1950) The Federal Bureau of Investigation. New York: William Sloane Associates.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1983) “The Self-Reproduction of the Law and Its Limits.” Presented at the Conference on Reflexive Law and the Regulatory Crisis, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1982) The Differentiation of Society. trans. Holmes, by S. and Larmore, C.. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUHMANN, Niklas (1981) “Communication About Law in Interaction Systems,” in Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
LUKES, Steven, and Andrew, SCULL (eds.) (1983) Durkheim and the Law. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1985) “An Empirical View on Contract,” 1985 Wisconsin Law Review 3.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1983) “Private Government,” Working Paper 1983-6, Disputes Processing Research Program, Madison, WI. Also published in Lipson, L. and Wheeler, S. (eds.), Law and Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1977) “Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures and the Complexities of Contract,” 11 Law & Society Review 507.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1966) Law and the Balance of Power: The Automobile Manufacturers and Their Dealers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MacCALL, Morgan W., and Robert E., KAPLAN (1985) Whatever It Takes: Decision Makers at Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
MACEY, Jonathan (1986) “Promoting Public-regarding Legislation Through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model,” 86 Columbia Law Review 223.Google Scholar
MacNEIL, Ian R. (1985) “Relational Contract: What We Do and Do Not Know,” 1985 Wisconsin Law Review 3.Google Scholar
MacNEIL, Ian R. (1980) The New Social Contract. An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacPHERSON, C. B. (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MANNHEIM, Karl (1936) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
MANNING, Bayless (1977) “Hyperlexis: Our National Disease,” 71 Northwestern University Law Review 767.Google Scholar
MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL COURT OF DENMARK (1986) “Statistical Information,” in So-og Handelsretten gennem 125. Copenhagen: Maritime and Commercial Court.Google Scholar
MARVELL, Thomas B. (1987) “Caseload Growth—Past and Future Trends,” 71 Judicature 151.Google Scholar
MARVELL, Thomas B. (1985) “Civil Caseloads: The Impact of the Economy on Trial Judgeship Increase,” 69 Judicature 153.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1990) “Dispute Processing and A Longitudinal Approach to Courts,” 24 Law & Society Review 357.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1979a) Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal-Case Disposition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1979b) “Comments on the History of Plea Bargaining,” 13 Law & Society Review 281.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn, and Yngvesson, Barbara (1980–81) “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 775.Google Scholar
MAURICE, Marc, Francois, SELLIER, and Jean Jacques, SILVESTRE (1979) “La Production de la hierarchie dans l'entreprise: recherche d'un effet societal; comparison France-Allemagne,” 20 Revue Francaise de Sociologie 331.Google Scholar
MAYHEW, Leon H., and Albert J., REISS Jr. (1969) “The Social Organization of Legal Contacts,” 34 American Sociological Review 309.Google Scholar
McDONALD, Terrence J. (1987) “Building the Impossible State: A Polity Centered Approach to State Building in America, 1820–1930.” in Jackson, John E. (ed.), Essays in American Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McDONALD, Terrence J. (1986) The Parameters of Urban Fiscal Policy: Socioeconomic Change, Political Culture, Policy in San Francisco, 1860–1906. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McDONALD, Terrence, and Sally, WARD (1984) The Politics of Urban Fiscal Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
McEWEN, Craig A., and Richard J., MAIMAN (1986) “The Relative Significance of Disputing Forum and Dispute Characteristics for Outcome and Compliance,” 20 Law & Society Review 439.Google Scholar
McEWEN, Craig A., and Richard J., MAIMAN (1984) “Mediation in Small Claims Court: Achieving Compliance Through Consent,” 18 Law & Society Review 11.Google Scholar
McGOVERN, Francis E. (1986) “Toward a Functional Approach for Managing Complex Litigation,” 53 University of Chicago Law Review 440.Google Scholar
McGUIRE, E. Patrick (1988) “The Impact of Product Liability.” Research Report No. 908 of the Conference Board, New York, NY.Google Scholar
McHUGH, Carol (1983) “Specialties Create Need for Exotic Publications,” Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 21 March, p. 1.Google Scholar
McINTOSH, Wayne V. (1990) The Appeal of Civil Law: A Political-economic Analysis of Litigation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
McINTOSH, Wayne V. (1985) “A State Court's Clientele: Exploring the Strategy of Trial Litigation,” 19 Law & Society Review 421.Google Scholar
McINTOSH, Wayne V. (1983) “Private Use of a Public Forum: A Long-Range View of the Dispute Processing Role of Courts,” 77 American Political Science Review 991.Google Scholar
McINTOSH, Wayne V. (1980–81) “150 Years of Litigation and Dispute Settlement: A Court Tale,” 15 Law & Society Review 823.Google Scholar
MENKEL-MEADOW, Carrie (1985) “The Transformation of Disputes by Lawyers: What the Dispute Paradigm Does and Does Not Tell Us,” 1985 Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution 25.Google Scholar
MENKEL-MEADOW, Carrie (1983) “Legal Negotiation: A Study of Strategies in Search of a Theory,” 1983 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 905.Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally Engle (1985) “Concepts of Law and Justice Among Working-Class Americans: Ideology as Culture,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 59.Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally Engle (1982) “Toward the General Theory of Gossip and Scandal,” in Black, D. (ed.), Toward a General Theory of Social Control. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally Engle (1979) “Going to Court: Strategies of Dispute Management in an American Urban Neighborhood,” 13 Law & Society Review 891.Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally Engle, and Susan S., SILBEY (1984) “What Do Plaintiffs Want? Reexamining the Concept of Dispute,” 9 Justice System Journal 151.Google Scholar
MERRYMAN, John Henry, and David S., CLARK (1978) Comparative Law: Western European and Latin American Legal Systems. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
MERRYMAN, John Henry, CLARK, David S., and Lawrence M., FRIEDMAN (1979) Law and Social Change in Mediterranean Europe and Latin America. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
MERTON, Robert K. (1965) “Durkheim's Division of Labor in Society,” in Nisbet, Robert (ed.), Emile Durkheim. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
MESSINGER, Sheldon L., BEROCHEA, John E., RAUMA, David, and Richard A., BERK (1985) “The Foundations of Parole in California,” 19 Law & Society Review 69.Google Scholar
MEZEY, Susan Gluck (1987) “Conflict over the Rule of Law: Nonacquiescence by the Social Security Administration.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
MIGUEL Y ROMERO, Mauro, and Carlos de MIGUEL Y, ALONSO (1967) Derecho Procesal Practico, Vol. 1. 11th ed. Barcelona: Bosch, Casa Editorial.Google Scholar
MILLER, Geoffrey P. (1986) “An Economic Analysis of the Rule 68,” 15 Journal of Legal Studies 93.Google Scholar
MILLER, Herbert S., McDONALD, William F., and James A., CRAMER (1978) Plea Bargaining in the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard E., and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing and Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
MILLER, Wilbur R. (1986) “Police and the State: A Comparative Perspective,” 1986 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 339.Google Scholar
MILLSPAUGH, Arthur C. (1937) Crime Control by the National Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
MILLSPAUGH, Arthur C. (1936) Local Democracy and Crime Control. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
MINCHINTON, Walter (1976) “Patterns of Demand 1750–1914,” in Cipolla, Carlo M. (ed.), The Fontana Economic History of Europe. Vol. 3. New York: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
MINISTERE DE LA JUSTICE (1970–1984) Annuaire Statistique de la Justice. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.Google Scholar
MITCHELL, Cynthia F., and Paul M., BARRETT (1988) “Novel Effort to Settle Asbestos Claims Fails as Lawsuits Multiply,” Wall Street Journal, 7 June, p. 1.Google Scholar
MIYAZAWA, Setsuo (1987) “Taking Kawashima Seriously: A Review of Japanese Research on Japanese Legal Consciousness and Disputing Behavior,” 21 Law & Society Review 219.Google Scholar
MNOOKIN, Robert H., and Lewis, KORNHAUSER (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
MONKKONEN, Eric H. (1990) “The American State from the Bottom Up: Of Homicides and Courts,” 24 Law & Society Review 521.Google Scholar
MONKKONEN, Eric H. (1988) America Becomes Urban: The Development of U.S. Cities and Towns, 1780–1980. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MONKKONEN, Eric H. (1984a) “The Politics of Municipal Indebtedness and Default, 1850–1936,” in McDonald, Terrence and Ward, Sally (eds.), The Politics of Urban Fiscal Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
MONKKONEN, Eric H. (1984b) “Why Is the History of Crime in the United States Different from the History of Crime in Britain?” Presented at the International Conference on Violence in History, Maastrict, Netherlands.Google Scholar
MONKKONEN, Eric H. (1975) The Dangerous Class: Crime and Poverty in Columbus, Ohio, 1860–1885. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1990) “Remarks: Roundtable on Silences in Research and Theory: The Role of the State in Sociolegal Studies,” 10 Law, Politics and Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1987) “Social Facts and Fabrications: ‘Customary’ Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980,” 19 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 524.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1972) “Legal Liability and Evolutionary Interpretation,” in Gluckman, M. (ed.), The Allocation of Responsibility. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk et al. (1990) “Roundtable on Silences in Research and Theory: The Role of the State in Sociolegal Studies,” 10 Law, Politics and Society (forthcoming).Google Scholar
MORNET, Francois (1980) La Justice et le recouvrement de l'impaye: qui est saisi, comment et pourquoi. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank (1988) “Law, Change and Litigation: A Critical Examination of an Empirical Research Tradition,” 22 Law & Society Review 57.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank (1987a) “Social Change and Tort Litigation: Industrialization, Accidents, and Trial Courts in Southern West Virginia, 1872 to 1940,” 36 Buffalo law Review 75.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank (1987b) “Businesses and Litigation in the Progressive Era.” Presented at the Conference on Longitudinal Research on Trial Courts, Buffalo, New York.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank (1986a) “Commercial Litigation in West Virginia State and Federal Courts 1870–1940,” 30 American Journal of Legal History 322.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank (1986b) “Longitudinal Research on Trial Courts: The Gap Between Present Results and Future Potential.” Proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (ed.) (1980) No Access to Law: Alternatives to the American Judicial System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (ed.) (1969b) “Styles of Court Procedure: To Make the Balance,” in Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (ed.) (1965) “Choices in Legal Procedure: Shia Moslem and Mexican Zapotec,” 67 American Anthropologist 394.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura, and Harry F., TODD Jr. (eds.) (1978) The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS (1984) “A Preliminary Examination of Available Civil and Criminal Trend Data in State Trial Courts for 1978, 1981, and 1984,” in Roper, Robert (ed.), State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report, 1984. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
NELSON, Robert (1988a) Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
NELSON, Robert (1988b) “Ideology, Scholarship, and Sociological Change: Lessons from Galanter and the ‘Litigation Crisis’,” 21 Law & Society Review 677.Google Scholar
NELSON, Robert (1981) “Practice and Privilege: Social Change and the Structure of Large Law Firms,” 1981 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 95.Google Scholar
NEWMAN, Katherine, and Paul ATTEWELL (1985) “A Compliance-Resource Theory of Regulatory Failure: The Case of OSHA,” 5 International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 29.Google Scholar
NEW YORK SECRETARY OF STATE (1857) Report of the Secretary of State on the Criminal Statistics of the State of New York. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
OFFE, Claus (1981) “The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations on the West German Case,” in Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ORLANDO, Jacqueline (1988) “Asbestos Litigation and the Ohio Asbestos Litigation Plan: Insulating the Courts from the Heat,” 3 Ohio Journal of Dispute Resolution 399.Google Scholar
PADGETT, John F. (1990) “Plea Bargaining and Prohibition in the Federal Courts, 1908–1934,” 24 Law & Society Review 413.Google Scholar
PADGETT, John F. (1985) “The Emergent Organization of Plea Bargaining,” 90 American Journal of Sociology 753.Google Scholar
PALMER, Ian (1985) “State Theory and Statutory Authorities: Points of Convergence,” 19 Sociology 523.Google Scholar
PERLOFF, Jeffery M., and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1988) “Settlements in Private Antitrust Litigation,” in Salop, Steven and White, Lawrence (eds.), Antitrust Litigation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
PETERSON, M. A., and G., PRIEST (1982) The Civil Jury: Trends in Trials and Verdicts, Cook County, Illinois, 1960–1979. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
PIERSON, Christopher (1984) “New Theories of State and Civil Society: Recent Developments in Post-Marxist Analysis of the State,” 18 Sociology 563.Google Scholar
PINDYCK, Robert S., and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1989) Microeconomics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
PINSEAU, Hubert (1985) L'organisation judiciaire de la France. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.Google Scholar
PLOTT, Charles R. (1987) “Rational Choice in Experimental Markets,” in Hogarth, Robin M. and Reder, Melvin W. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
P'NG, Ivan Paak Liang (1983) “Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement, and Trial,” 14 Bell Journal of Economics 539.Google Scholar
POLINSKY, A. Mitchell, and Daniel L., RUBINFELD (1988) “The Welfare Implications of Costly Litigation for the Theory of Liability,” 17 Journal of Legal Studies 151.Google Scholar
POLLACK, Friederick, and Frederick William, MAITLAND [1985] (1968) The History of English Law from Edward II. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
POSNER, Richard A. (1985) The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
POTTER, Sulamith Heins (1977) Family Life in a Northern Thai Village: A Study in the Structural Significance of Women. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
POUND, Roscoe (1930) Criminal Justice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
PRIEST, George (1987) “Measuring Legal Change,” 3 Journal of Law and Economic Organization 193.Google Scholar
PRIEST, George (1977) “The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules,” 6 Journal of Legal Studies 65.Google Scholar
PRIEST, G. L., and B., KLEIN (1984) The Selection of Disputes for Litigation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PROULX, Marcel (1986) La gestion de cing Tribunaux d'instance de la region parisienne. Paris: IEP.Google Scholar
PROVINE, D. Marie (1985) Settlement Strategies of Federal District Judges. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
PRZEWORSKI, Adam (1985) Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PURNICK, Joyce (1985) “A Downtown Dig for Artifacts from the Days of Old Breukelen,” New York Times, 1 September, p. 42.Google Scholar
RABIBHADANA, M. R. Akin (1969) The Organization of Thai Society in the Early Bangkok Period, 1782–1873. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar
RAMOS MÉNDEZ, Francisco (1986) Derecho Procesal Civil, Vols. 1 and 2. 3d ed. Barcelona: Libreria Bosch.Google Scholar
RANIERI, Filippo (1985) Recht und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter der Rezeption, 2 vols. Cologne: Bohlau.Google Scholar
RANII, David (1985) “New Group Takes Aim at the Tobacco Industry,” National Law Journal, 11 February, p. 4.Google Scholar
RASLER, Karen (1986) “War, Accommodation, and Violence in the United States, 1890–1970,” 80 American Political Science Review 921.Google Scholar
REED, Alfred Z. (1928) Present-Day Law Schools in the United States and Canada. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
REED, Alfred Z. (1921) Training for the Public Profession of the Law. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr. (1990) “Longitudinal Study of Trial Courts,” 24 Law & Society Review 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr. (1974) “Citizen Access to Criminal Justice,” 1 British Journal of Law and Society 50.Google Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr., and A. D., BIDERMAN (1980) Data Sources on White-Collar Law-breaking. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
REISS, A. J. Jr., and D., BORDUA (1967) “Environment and Organization: A Perspective on the Police,” in Bordua, D. (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
RHEINGOLD, Paul D. (1982) “The Development of Litigation Groups,” 6 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 1.Google Scholar
RHEINGOLD, Paul D. (1968) “The MER/29 Story—An Instance of Successful Mass Litigation,” 56 California Law Review 116.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, William, and Barry, MEIER (1987) “Lawyers Lead Hunt for New Groups of Asbestos Victims,” Wall Street Journal, Feb. 18, p. 1.Google Scholar
RIKER, William H., and Barry, WEINGAST (1988) “Constitutional Regulation of Legislation: The Consequences of Judicial Deference,” 74 Virginia Law Review 373.Google Scholar
ROSE, Richard (1978) “Ungovernability: Is There Fire Behind the Smoke?” 27 Political Studies 351.Google Scholar
ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan (1988) “Progressive Law and Economics—and the New Administrative Law,” 98 Yale Law Journal 341.Google Scholar
ROSENFELD, Andrew (1976) “An Empirical Test of Class-Action Settlement,” 5 Journal of Legal Studies 113.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Douglas (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's in Charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
ROSS, H. Laurence (1970) Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
ROTTLEUTHNER, H. (1985) “Aspekte der Rechtsentwicklung in Deutschland. Ein soziologischer Vergleich Deutscher Rechtskulturen,” 6 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 206.Google Scholar
RUBINFELD, Daniel (1987) “The Efficiency of Comparative Negligence,” 16 Journal of Legal Studies 375.Google Scholar
RUBINFELD, Daniel L., and David, SAPPINGTON (1987) “Efficient Awards and Standards of Proof in Judicial Proceedings,” 18 Rand Journal of Economics 308.Google Scholar
RUFFINI, Julio L. (1978) “Disputing over Livestock in Sardinia,” in Nader, Laura and Todd, H. Jr. (eds.), The Disputing Process—Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
RULE, James (1978) “Models of Relevance: The Social Effects of Sociology,” 84 American Journal of Sociology 78.Google Scholar
SANDERS, Janet (1979) “Title VII: The Boom Is Over,” National Law Journal, 28 May, p. 1.Google Scholar
SANDERS, Joseph (1990) “The Interplay of Micro and Macro Processes in The Longitudinal Study of Courts: Beyond the Durkheimian Tradition,” 24 Law & Society Review 241.Google Scholar
SANDERS, Joseph, and V. Lee, HAMILTON (1987) “Attribution of Responsibility and Punishment in Japan and the United States: How Big Is the Gap?” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
SANTOS, SANTOS Boaventura de (1977) “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada,” 12 Law & Society Review 5.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1985) “Legal Effectiveness and Social Studies of Law: On the Unfortunate Persistence of a Research Tradition,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 23.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1976) “Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in Small Claims Court,” 10 Law & Society Review 339.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and William L. F., FELSTINER (1986) “Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office,” 20 Law & Society Review 93.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and Joel B., GROSSMAN (1975) “Courts and Conflict Resolution: Problems in the Mobilization of Adjudication,” 69 American Political Science Review 1200.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and Susan, SILBEY (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97.Google Scholar
SAVONA, Ernesto Ugo (1976) “Civil Trial and Social Justice in Italy: A Sociological Analysis of Proceedings under Art. 28 of the Workers' Statute,” 4 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 207.Google Scholar
SCHEIBER, Harry (1975) “Federalism and the American Economic Order, 1789–1910,” 10 Law & Society Review 57.Google Scholar
SCHEINGOLD, Stewart (1974) The Politics of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SCHELLE, Tage (1986) “The Origin of the Maritime and Commercial Court and the First Centennial,” in So-og Handelsretten gennem 125 ar. Copenhagen: Maritime and Commercial Court.Google Scholar
SCHMECKEBIER, Laurence F. (1929) The Bureau of Prohibition: Its History, Activities and Organization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER, Mark (1982) “Criminal Enforcement of Federal Water Pollution Laws in an Era of De-regulation,” 73 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 642.Google Scholar
SCHUCK, Peter H. (1986) Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Diasters in the Courts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
SCHWAB, Stewart J., and Theodore, EISENBERG (1988) “Explaining Constitutional Tort Litigation: The Influence of the Attorney Fees Statute and the Government as Defendant,” 73 Cornell Law Review 719.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard (1954) “Social Factors in the Development of Legal Control: A Case Study of Two Israeli Settlements,” 63 Yale Law Review 471.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D., and James C., MILLER (1964) “Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity,” 70 American Journal of Sociology 159.Google Scholar
SCHWARZ, Klaus (1983) “Zur Einwohnerzahl Bremens im 17.Jh.” Manuscript. Staatsarchiv, Bremen.Google Scholar
SCHWARZWÄLDER, Herbert (1975) Geschichte der Freien Hansestadt Bremen. 2 Vols. Bremen: Roever.Google Scholar
SEIDMAN, Harold, and Robert, GILMOUR (1986) Politics, Position, and Power: From the Positive to the Regulatory State. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SELVIN, Hannan C. (1965) “Durkheim's Suicide: Further Thoughts on a Methodological Classic,” in Robert A. Nisbet, Emile Durkheim. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
SELVIN, M., and P., EBENER (1984) Managing the Unmanageable: A History of Civil Delay in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
SENNINGER, Erhard (1989) “Die Entwicklung der Anwaltschaft an der Schwelle des europäischen Binnenmarktes,” 39 Anwaltsblatt 298.Google Scholar
SERON, Carroll (1990) “The Impact of Court Organization on Litigation,” 24 Law & Society Review 451.Google Scholar
SEWELL, William H. (1987) “Theory of Action, Dialectic, and History: Comment on Coleman,” 93 American Journal of Sociology 166.Google Scholar
SHANLEY, M. G., and M. A., PETERSON (1983) Comparative Justice: Civil and Jury Verdicts in San Francisco and Cook Counties, 1959–1980. Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Martin M. (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
SHARP, Lauriston, and Lucien M., HANKS (1978) Bang Chan: Social History of a Rural Community in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
SHAVELL, Steven (1982) “Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis Under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs,” 11 Journal of Legal Studies 55.Google Scholar
SILBEY, Susan (1985) “Ideals and Practices in the Study of Law,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 7.Google Scholar
SILBEY, Susan, and Sally Engle, MERRY (1986) “Mediator Settlement Strategies,” 8 Law & Policy 7.Google Scholar
SKOCPOL, Theda (1987) “Social History and Historical Sociology: Contrasts and Complementarities,” 11 Social Science History 17.Google Scholar
SKOCPOL, Theda (1985) “Bringing the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” in Evans, Peter B., Reuschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SKOCPOL, Theda (1980) “Political Response to Capital Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal,” 10 Politics and Society 155.Google Scholar
SKOCPOL, Theda, and Kenneth, FINEGOLD (1982) “State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal,” 97 Political Science Quarterly 255.Google Scholar
SKOCPOL, Theda, and John, IKENBERRY (1983) “The Political Formation of the American Welfare State in Historical and Comparative Perspective,” 6 Comparative Social Research 87.Google Scholar
SKOWRONEK, Stephen (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SMITH, Richard A. (1961) “The Incredible Electrical Conspiracy,” Fortune, April, p. 132, May, p. 161.Google Scholar
SMITH, Robert J. (1983) Japanese Society: Tradition, Self and the Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SNYDER, Francis (1980) “Law and Development in the Light of Dependency Theory,” 4 Law & Society Review 703.Google Scholar
SOETENHORST–DE SAVORNIN LOHMAN, Jacqueline (1983) Zuinig met recht. Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
SPITZER, Matthew (1980) “Radio Formats Administrative Choice,” 47 University of Chicago Law Review 647.Google Scholar
SPITZER, Matthew (1979) “Multicriteria Choice Processes: An Application of Public Choice Theory of Bakke, the FCC and the Courts,” 88 Yale Law Journal 717.Google Scholar
STEINBERG, Allen (1984) “From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: Criminal Prosecution, the District Attorney, and American Legal History,” 30 Crime and Delinquency 568.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1986) “Rationality and Social Structure,” in Stinchombe, Arthur (ed.), Stratification and Organization: Selected Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1968) Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1965) “Organizations and Social Structure,” in March, James G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1959) “Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production: A Comparative Study,” 4 Administrative Science Quarterly 168.Google Scholar
STOOKEY, John A. (1990) “Trial and Tribulations: Crisis, Litigation and Legal Change,” 24 Law & Society Review 497.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1986) “Economic Cycles and Civil Litigation,” 11 Justice System Journal 282.Google Scholar
STRASSER, Fred (1987) “Bendectin Award: $95 Million,” National Law Journal, 27 July, p. 29.Google Scholar
STRAUSS, Anselm (1978) Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
SUDNOW, David (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office,” 12 Social Problems 255.Google Scholar
SUGARMAN, David (ed.) (1983) Legality, Ideology and the State. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
SYLLA, Richard (1986) “Long-Term Trends in State and Local Finance: Sources and Uses of Funds in North Carolina, 1800–1977,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert (eds.), Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
TAMBIAH, S. J. (1976) World Conquerer and World Renouncer: A Study of Buddhism and Polity in Thailand Against a Historical Background. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAMBIAH, S. J. (1970) Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TANASE, Takao (1990) “The Management of Disputes: Automobile Accident Compensation in Japan,” 24 Law and Society Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
TANCREDI, L. R., and J. A., BARONDESS (1978) “The Problem of Defensive Medicine,” 200 Science 879.Google Scholar
TARR, Amy (1985) “Lawyers Collide Over Post-Air-Crash Conduct Settlement: Litigation Tactics at Issue,” National Law Journal, 4 November, p. 1.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, W. B. (1985) “Between Global Process and Local Knowledge: An Inquiry into Early Latin American Social History, 1500–1900,” in Zunz, Oliver (ed.), Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
TEAFORD, Jon (1984) The Unheralded Triumph: City Government in America, 1870–1900. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
TEAFORD, Jon (1979) City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850–1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (1985) “Social Order from Legislative Noise? Autopoietic Closure as a Problem for Legal Regulation,” in Autopoiesis in Law and Society. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
TEAFORD, Jon (1984) “Autopoesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg,” 18 Law & Society Review 291.Google Scholar
THOMAS, Stanley (1958) “Jurisdiction of Illinois County and Probate Courts,” 46 Illinois Bar Journal 606.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, Edward P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, James D., and Arthur, TUDEN (eds.) (1959) “Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision,” in Thompson, J. D. and others, (eds.), Comparative Studies in Administration. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
TIFFANY, Lawrence P., Yakov, AVICHAI, and Geoffrey W., PETERS. (1975) “A Statistical Analysis of Sentencing in Federal Courts: Defendants Convicted After Trial, 1967–1968.” 4 Journal of Legal Studies 369.Google Scholar
TILLY, Charles (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, and Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
TINGLEY, Donald (1980) The Structuring of a State: The History of Illinois, 1899–1928. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
TOHARIA, José Juan (1987) “Pleitos Tengas!” Introduccion a la cultura legal espanola. Madrid: Siglo XXI de Espana.Google Scholar
TOHARIA, José Juan (1976) “Economic Development and Litigation: The Case of Spain,” 4 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 25. Presented to the Conference on the Sociology of the Judicial Process, University of Bielefeld, West Germany, 1973.Google Scholar
TOHARIA, José Juan (1975) “Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain,” 9 Law & Society Review 475.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1980–81b) “The Construction and Deconstruction of a Disputes-focused Approach: An Afterword,” 15 Law & Society Review 727.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1972), “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism,” 1972 Wisconsin law Review 720.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, D. M., and GALANTER, M. (1974) “Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies,” 1974 Wisconsin Law Review 1062.Google Scholar
TURKEL, Gerald (1979) “Testing Durkheim: Some Theoretical Considerations,” 13 Law & Society Review 721.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R. (1988) “What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures,” 22 Law & Society Review 103.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto M. (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
U.S. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS (1937–1987) Annual Reports of the Director. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (1908–34) Annual Reports of Attorney General.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (1916) Instructions to United States Marshalls, Attorneys, Clerks, and Commissioners.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (1939) Survey of Release Procedures, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOL (1924–33) Statistics Concerning Intoxicating Liquors.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF PROHIBITION (1930) State Cooperation: Federal and State Responsibility Under the Concurrent Power.Google Scholar
U.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE (1989) Product Liability: Verdicts and Case Resolutions in Five States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE (1988) Product Liability: Extent of Litigation Explosion in Federal Courts Questioned. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LAW OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT (Wickersham Commission) (1931a) Report #1: Report on the Enforcement of Prohibition Laws of the United States. Doc. 722, 71st Congress, 3d session.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LAW OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT (1931b) Report #2: Report on the Enforcement of Prohibition Laws of the United States. Doc. 722, 71st Congress, 3d session.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LAW OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT (1931c) Report #3: Report on Criminal Statistics.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LAW OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT (1931d) Report #7: Progress Report on the Study of the Federal Courts.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LAW OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT (1931e) Vol. 5: Enforcement of the Prohibition Laws. Senate Doc. 307, 71st Congress, 3d session.Google Scholar
U.S. OFFICE OF PRICE ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF TEMPORARY CONTROLS (1947) “The Beginnings of OPA: The Price Control Act of 1942,” General Publication No. 1.Google Scholar
U.S. SENATE, JUDICIARY COMMITTEE (1926) The National Prohibition Law: Hearings before the Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary.Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS (1987) National Accounts Statistics: Analysis of Main Aggregates, 1983/1984. New York: UN.Google Scholar
UPHAM, Frank (1987) Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
VALENTINE, David T. (1864) Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1864. New York: New York City Common Council.Google Scholar
VAN LOON, F., and E., LANGERWERF (1990) “Socioeconomic Development and the Evolution of Litigation Rates of Civil Courts in Belgium, 1835–1980,” 24 Law & Society Review 283.Google Scholar
VAN LOON, F., and E., LANGERWERF (1987) Burgerlijke Rechtbanken: Wie, Wat, Hoe? Antwerp: Kluwer.Google Scholar
VERWOERD, Jan R. A. (1988) “Beroep op de rechter als laatste remedie?” Unpublished dissertation, Arnhem.Google Scholar
VERWOERD, Jan. R. A., and Erhard, BLANKENBURG (1985a) “Biotopen in de mobilisering van recht; een vergelijkende studie van de rechtsversorgende systemen in Nederland en de Westduitse deelstaat Nordrhein-Westfalen.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
VERWOERD, Jan. R. A., and Erhard, BLANKENBURG (1985b) Comparing Litigation in the Netherlands with That of Northrhine Westphalia in Germany, 1970–1981.” Presented at the World Congress of Sociology of Law, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1984) “The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization of Disputes and an Empirical Investigation,” 18 Law & Society Review 515.Google Scholar
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW (1947) “Twelve Years with the ‘Heart Balm Acts’,” 33 Virginia Law Review 314.Google Scholar
WAGTSUMA, Hiroshi, and Arthur, ROSSETT (1986) “The Implications of Apology: Law and Culture in Japan and the United States,” 20 Law & Society Review 461.Google Scholar
WALD, PATRICIA (1983) “The Problem with the Courts: Black-robed Bureaucracy, or Collegiality Under Challenge?” 42 Maryland Law Review 766.Google Scholar
WALES, H. G. Quaritch (1931) Siamese State Ceremonies: Their History and Function. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
WALTON, Clarence C., and Frederick W., CLEVELAND (1964) Corporations on Trial: The Electric Cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publ. Co.Google Scholar
WANNER, Craig (1975) “The Public Ordering of Private Relations, Part Two: Winning Civil Court Cases,” 9 Law & Society Review 293.Google Scholar
WANNER, Craig (1974) “The Public Ordering of Private Relations, Part One, Initiating Civil Cases in Urban Trial Courts,” 8 Law & Society Review 421.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1967) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
WEBER, Nathan (1987) Product Liability: The Corporate Response. New York: Conference Board.Google Scholar
WERLE, Raymond (1982) “Aspekte der Verrechtlichung,” 3 Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 2.Google Scholar
WHEELER, Stanton, CARTWRIGHT, Bliss, KAGAN, Robert A., and Lawrence M., FRIEDMAN (1987) “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 21 Law & Society Review 403.Google Scholar
WHITFORD, William (1984) “The Small-Case Procedure of the U.S. Tax Court: A Small Claims Court That Works,” 1984 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 797.Google Scholar
WIEACKER, Franz (1967) Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. 2d ed. Gottingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
WIGMORE, J. H. (1937) The Science of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials. 3d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
WIJEYEWARDENE, Gehan (1970) “The Still Point and the Turning World: Towards the Structure of Northern Thai Religion,” 7 Mankind 247.Google Scholar
WILKIE, James W., and Adam, PERKAL (eds.) (1984) Statistical Abstract of Latin America, Vol. 23. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications.Google Scholar
WILLEBRANDT, Mobel Walker (1929) The Inside of Prohibition. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
WILLGING, Thomas (1987) Trends in Asbestos Litigation. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. (1979) “Transaction-Cost Economics. The Governance of Contractual Relations,” 22 Journal of Law and Economics 233.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. (1985) Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
WIMBERLY, Howard (1973) “Legal Evolution: One Further Step,” 79 American Journal of Sociology 78.Google Scholar
WIPPLER, Richard, and Siegwart, LINDENBERG (1987) “Collective Phenomena and Rational Choice,” in Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., and Smelser, N. J. (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WOLFE, Alan (1977) The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Christian (1990) “Civil Litigation and Modernization: The Work of The Municipal Courts of Bremen, Germany in Five Centuries, 1549–1984,” 24 Law & Society Review 261.Google Scholar
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Christian (1989) “Die Arbeit der europäischen Zivilgerichte im historischen und internationalen Vergleich. Zeitreihen der europäisch en Zivilprozessflut seit dem 19. Jahrhundert,” in Blankenburg, Erhard (ed.), Prozessflut? Studien zur Prozesstätigkeit europäischer Gerichte in historischen Zeitreihen und im Rechtsvergleich. Cologne: Bundesanzeiger.Google Scholar
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Christian (1985) “Time Series of Litigation in Europe since the Nineteenth Century.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Christian (1982) “Ungleiche Justizgewähr und Zivilprozesshäufigkeit in der preussischen Ständigesellschaft um 1750,” in Horn, N. (ed.), Europäisches Rechtsdenken in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift für H. Coing, vol. 1. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Christian (1981) “Zivilprozess-Statistik und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in Preussen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert,” Zeitschrift für neuere Rechtsgeschichte 16.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1956) “The Influence of the Defendant's Plea on Judicial Determination of Sentence,” 66 Yale Law Journal 204.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1990) “Contextualizing the Court: Comment on the Cultural Study of Litigation,” 24 Law & Society Review 467.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1988) “Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town,” 22 Law & Society Review 409.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1985a) “Re-examining Continuing Relations and the Law,” 1985 Wisconsin Law Review 623.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1985b) “Legal Ideology and Community Justice in the Clerk's Office,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 71.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1982) “What Is a Dispute About? The Political Interpretation of Social Control,” in Black, Donald (ed.) Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara, and Lynn, MATHER (1983) “Courts, Moots, and the Disputing Process,” in Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara, and Patricia, HENNESSEY (1975) “Small Claims, Complex Disputes: A Review of the Small Claims Literature,” 9 Law & Society Review 219.Google Scholar
YOHAI, Victor, Werner, ACKERMANN, and H., HAIGH (1985) “Nonlinear Principal Components,” 19 Quality and Quantity 53.Google Scholar
ZEMANS, Francis Kahn (1983) “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System,” 77 American Political Science Review 690.Google Scholar
ZEMANS, Francis Kahn (1982) “Framework for Analysis of Legal Mobilization: A Decisionmaking Model,” 1982 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 989.Google Scholar
ZUCKERMAN, S., C. R., KOLLER, and R. R., BORBJERG (1986) “Information on Malpractice: A Review of Empirical Research on Major Policy Issues,” 49 (no. 2) Law and Contemporary Problems 85.Google Scholar
List of Cases Cited
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 83–2864 (D.N.J., 1988), rev'd 88–5732 (C.A.3, Jan. 5, 1990).Google Scholar
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 463 U.S. 29 (1983).Google Scholar
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 13 Cal. 3d 177, 529 P.2d 553, 118 Cal. Rptr. 129 (1974), withdrawn and replaced by 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976).Google Scholar
United States v. Alphonse Capone (1931) Cases # 22852 & 23232: Transcript of Consolidation Hearing on July 30, 1931, Box RG21, National Archives, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305, 105 S. Ct. 3180, 87 L. Ed. 2d 220 (1985).Google Scholar