Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:30:11.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on the Study of Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Michael Couzens
Michael Couzens*
Affiliation:
The Brookings Institution
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are in the midst of a quickening, if inchoate, dispute as to whether Americans are an inherently violent people. Whatever the merits of this metapsychological discussion, there is no disagreement that Americans have a propensity to interpret both officially and unofficially the violence we do have (Waskow, 1966; Silver, 1968). The final report of the “violence commission” stands in this tradition, and by its size and scope, taken together with its supporting studies, aspires to culminate it.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , May 1971 , pp. 583 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

AUTHOR'S NOTE: The author is grateful to Elliott Currie, Milton Mankoff, and Arnold Ross, who read an earlier draft of this review and offered important criticisms. Of course, they may not be called to account for the final result, nor may the trustees, officers, or other staff members of The Brookings Institution.

References

ARENDT, H. (1969) On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
BIENEN, H. (1968) Violence and Social Change: A Review of Current Literature. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
CHAMBLISS, W. J. (1969) Crime and the Legal Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
CHAMBLISS, W. J. (1967) “Types of deviance and the effectiveness of legal sanctions.” Wisconsin Law Rev. 1967 (Summer): 703–719.Google Scholar
Chicago Commission on Race Relations (1922) The Negro in Chicago: A Study in Race Relations and a Race Riot. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chicago Riot Study Committee (1968) Report. Chicago.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, R. (1968) “On not prosecuting civil disobedience.” New York Rev. of Books (June 6): 14–21.Google Scholar
FOGELSON, R. M., G. G., BLACK, and M., LIPSKY (1969) “Review symposium: report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 59 (December): 1268–1281.Google Scholar
FORTAS, A. (1968) Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
FRANKEL, M. (1968) “Secret Service given campaign security task by President.” New York Times (June 6): 1.Google Scholar
FREEMAN, H. A. et al. (1966) Civil Disobedience. Santa Barbara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar
GIBBS, J. P. (1966) “Conceptions of deviant behavior: the old and the new.” Pacific Soc. Rev. 9 (Spring): 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, L. B. (1970) “Address to the nation following the attack on Senator Kennedy,” pp. 691-693 in Public Papers of the Presidents 1968-9. Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
LIPSKY, M. and D. J., OLSON (1969) “Riot commission politics.” Trans-action 6 (July-August): 9–21.Google Scholar
MARX, G. (1968) “Two cheers for the Riot Commission report.” Harvard Rev. 4, 3: 3–14.Google Scholar
MILLER, P. (1964) Errand into the Wilderness. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
MILLS, C. W. (1967) “The professional ideology of social pathologists,” Pp. 525–552 in Horowitz, I.L. (ed.) Power Politics and People. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
MORRIS, N. and G., HAWKINS (1970) The Honest Politician's Guide to Crime Control. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968) Report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, Task Force Reports. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(1-2)GRAHAM, H. D. and T. R., GURR, [eds.] (1969) Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives.Google Scholar
(3)SKOLNICK, J. H. (1969) The Politics of Protest.Google Scholar
(4)SAHID, J.R. [director, study team] (1969) Rights in Concord: Response to the Counter-inaugural Protest Activities in Washington, D.C., January 18-20, 1969.Google Scholar
(5)MASOTTI, L. H. and J. R., CORSI (1969) Shoot-out in Cleveland: Black Militants and the Police.Google Scholar
(6)ORRICK, W. H. Jr. [director, study team] (1969) Shut It Down! A College in Crisis: San Francisco State College, October 1968-April 1969.Google Scholar
(7)NEWTON, G. D. Jr., and F. E., ZIMRING (1969) Firearms and Violence in American Life.Google Scholar
(8)KIRKHAM, J. F., S. G., LEVY, and W. J., CROTTY (1969) Assassination and Political Violence.Google Scholar
(9)LANGE, D. L., R. K., BAKER, and S. J., BALL (1969) Mass Media and Violence.Google Scholar
(10)CAMPBELL, J. S., J. R., SAHID, and D. P., STANG (1969) Law and Order Reconsidered.Google Scholar
(11)WALKER, D. [director, study team] (1968) Rights in Conflict. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
(12)HECTOR, L. J. and P. L. E., HELLIWELL [directors, study team] (1969) Miami Report.Google Scholar
(13-15)MULVIHILL, D. J., M. M., TUMIN, and L. A., CURTIS (1970) Individual Acts of Violence.Google Scholar
PLATT, A. M. [ed.] (1971) Politics of Riot Commissions. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
PLATT, A. M. President's Commission on Campus Unrest. (1970) Report. Washington, D.C. September.Google Scholar
PLATT, A. M. [ed.] (1970) Special Report: The Kent State Tragedy. Washington, D.C. October.Google Scholar
PLATT, A. M. [ed.] (1970) Special Report: The Killings at Jackson State. Washington, D.C. October.Google Scholar
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
RUBINGTON, E. and M. S., WEINBERG (1968) Deviance-the Interactionist Perspective. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
SHORT, J. F. Jr., and M. E., WOLFGANG [eds.] (1970) Collective Violence. Annals 391 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SILVER, A. (1968) “Official interpretations of race riots.” Proceedings of the Academy of Pol. Sci. 29, 1: 146–158.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, J. (1966) Justice Without Trial. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
SOREL, G. (1961) Reflections on Violence. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
United States Commission on Civil Rights, Law Enforcement (1965) A Report on Equal Protection in the South. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy (1964) Report. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
WASKOW, A. I. (1966) From Race Riot to Sit-in: 1919 and the 1960s. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
ZINN, H. (1968) Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies of Law and Order. New York: Random House.Google Scholar