Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T18:25:46.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rush to Judgment: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Equity in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Mark Atlas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1992, the National Law Journal (NLJ) published a study claiming that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency discriminated against minorities in its civil judicial enforcement actions by penalizing environmental law violators in minority areas far less than in white areas. NLJ claimed that this differential showed a lack of commitment to protecting the environment and public health in minority areas. This article augments, reexamines, and analyzes in a more sophisticated manner the available data. My empirical analyses demonstrate the unreliability of NLJ's methods and conclusions and indicate that minorities have not been discriminated against in these enforcement actions.

Type
Forum on Environmental Equity Research
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , 2001 , pp. 633 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Nikia Fuller and Colleen Cunningham in gathering data used in this research, as well as the comments of several reviewers.

References

References

Adams, Thomas Jr. (1988) Process for Conducting Pre-Referral Settlement Negotiations on Civil Judicial Enforcement Cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Anderton, Douglas, Anderson, Andy, Oakes, John Michael, & Fraser, Michael (1994) “Environmental Equity: The Demographics of Dumping,” 31 Demography 229–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, Regina, & Schill, Michael (1991) “Black, Brown, Poor & Poisoned: Minority Grassroots Environmentalism and the Quest for Eco-Justice,” 1 Kansas J. of Law & Public Policy 69–82.Google Scholar
Been, Vicki (1993) “What's Fairness Got to Do With It: Environmental Justice and the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses,” 78 Cornell Law Rev. 1001–85.Google Scholar
Been, Vicki (1997) “Coming to the Nuisance of Going to the Barrios? A Longitudinal Analysis of Environmental Justice Claims,” 24 Ecology Law Quart. 1–56.Google Scholar
Bell, Griffin, & Costle, Douglas (1977) Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Boer, J. Tom, Pastor, Manuel Jr., Sadd, James, & Snyder, Lori (1997) “Is There Environmental Racism? The Demographics of Hazardous Waste in Los Angeles County,” 78 Social Science Quart. 793–810.Google Scholar
Boerner, Christopher, & Lambert, Thomas (1995) “Environmental Injustice,” 118 The Public Interest 61–82.Google Scholar
Brooks, Nancy, & Sethi, Rajiv (1997) “The Distribution of Pollution: Community Characteristics and Exposure to Air Toxics,” 32 J. of Environmental Economics & Management 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Mary (1993) “Unequal Justice? Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics Revisited,” 25 SONREEL NEWS 3–4 (September/October).Google Scholar
Bullard, Robert (1994a) Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Bullard, Robert (1994b) “The Legacy of American Apartheid and Environmental Racism,” 9 St. John's J. of Legal Commentary 445–74.Google Scholar
Bureau of National Affairs (1995) “Possible Changes Being Considered by EPA to Municipal Enforcement Policy, Official Says,” 25 Environment Reporter 1908.Google Scholar
Centner, Terence, Kriesel, Warren, & Keeler, Andrew (1996) “Environmental Justice and Toxic Releases: Establishing Evidence of Discriminatory Effect Based on Race and Not Income,” 3 Wisconsin Environmental Law J. 119–58.Google Scholar
Ekland-Olson, Sheldon (1988) “Structural Discretion, Racial Bias, and the Death Penalty: The First Decade After Furman in Texas,” 69 Social Science Quart. 853–73.Google Scholar
Fahsbender, John (1996) “An Analytical Approach to Defining the Affected Neighborhood in the Environmental Justice Context,” 5 New York Univ. Environmental Law J. 120–80.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James (1995) “Testing for Environmental Racism: Prejudice, Profits, Political Power?” 14 J. of Policy Analysis & Management 107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Rebecca (1995) “Health-Based Standards: What Role in Environmental Justice?” in Bryant, B. I., ed., Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hird, John (1993) “Environmental Policy and Equity: The Case of Superfund,” 12 J. of Policy Analysis & Management 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Peter (1967) “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Non-Standard Conditions,” 1 Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press 221–33.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Louise (1983) Case Management Procedures for Civil Water Referrals. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen, & Rolph, John (1991) “Relationship of Offender and Victim Race to Death Penalty Sentences in California,” 32 Jurimetrics J. 33–48.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert (1993) Let's Make a Deal: Understanding the Negotiation Process in Ordinary Litigation. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Robert (1994) “Remedying the Unequal Enforcement of Environmental Laws,” 9 St. John's J. of Legal Commentary 625–68.Google Scholar
Lavelle, Marianne, & Coyle, Marcia (1992) “Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental Law,” National Law J. S1–S12 (September 21).Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard (1993) “Pursuing ‘Environmental Justice’: The Distributional Effects of Environmental Protection,” 87 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 787–857.Google Scholar
Mank, Branford (1995) “Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation and Equitable Compensation,” 56 Ohio State Law J. 329–425.Google Scholar
Mintz, Joel (1995) Enforcement at the EPA: High Stakes and Hard Choices. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Mohai, Paul (1995) “Methodological Issues: The Demographics of Dumping Revisited: Examining the Impact of Alternate Methodologies in Environmental Justice Research,” 14 Virginia Environmental Law J. 615–33.Google Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond (1984) “Prosecutorial Discretion in Requesting the Death Penalty: A Case of Victim-Based Racial Discrimination,” 18 Law & Society Rev. 437–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlin, Susan, Setzer, R. Woodrow, Creason, John, & Sexton, Ken (1995) “Distribution of Industrial Air Emissions by Income and Race in the United States: An Approach Using the Toxic Release Inventory,” 29 Environmental Science & Technology 69–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, Robert (1982a) Draft DOJ/EPA Litigation Procedures. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Perry, Robert (1982b) General Operating Procedures for the Civil Enforcement Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Price, Courtney (1983a) Guidance for Drafting Judicial Consent Decrees. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Price, Courtney (1983b) Implementation of Direct Referrals for Civil Cases Beginning December 1, 1983. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Ramsey, James (1969) “Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least Squares Regression Analysis,” 31 J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 350–71.Google Scholar
Reilly, William, & Lavelle, Marianne (1993) “EPA's Reilly Replies to ‘Unequal Protection,‘” National Law J. 16, 18 (January 25).Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan (1997) “Equity and the Distribution of Environmental Risk: The Case of TRI Facilities,” 78 Social Science Quart. 811–29.Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan (1998) “A Question of Justice: Equity in Environmental Litigation, 1974–1991,” 60 J. of Politics 1148–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan, & Emmert, Craig (1999) “Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case of Environmental Civil Litigation,” 52 Political Research Quart. 7–37.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Jonathan, & Wallace, Donald (1995) “Arbitrariness and Discrimination in Missouri Capital Cases: An Assessment Using the Barnett Scale,” 18 J. of Crime & Justice 21–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strock, James (1990) Documenting Penalty Calculations and Justifications in EPA Enforcement Actions. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Szasz, Andrew, & Meuser, Michael (1997) “Environmental Inequalities: Literature Review and Proposals for New Directions in Research and Theory,” 45 Current Sociology 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1993) Statistical Abstract of the United States 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984) Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986a) Clean Water Act Penalty Policy for Civil Settlement Negotiations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986b) Guidance on Determining a Violator's Ability to Pay a Civil Penalty. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Clean Air Act Stationary Source Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990a) EPA Penalty Policy for Violations of Underground Storage Tank Regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990b) Final Penalty Policy for EPCRA §§ 302, 303, 304, 311, and 312 and for CERCLA § 103. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990c) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990d) RCRA Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991) Environmental Stewardship: EPA's First Two Years in the Bush Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993a) Enforcement Accomplishments Report, FY 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993b) Equity in the Enforcement of the Federal Environmental Laws: A Report to the EPA Enforcement Management Council by the EMC Workgroup on Equity in Enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995a) Environmental Justice 1994 Annual Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995b) Revised Interim Clean Water Act Settlement Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) “Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule,” 61 Fed. Reg. 69359–69366 (1996).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998a) “Announcement and Publication of the Policy for Municipality and Municipal Solid Waste; CERCLA Settlements at NPL Co-Disposal Sites,” 63 Fed. Reg. 8197–8201 (1998).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998b) “Final EPA Supplemental Projects Policy Issued,” 63 Fed. Reg. 24796–24804 (1998).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance FY98 Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
World Resources Institute (1993) The 1994 Information Please Environmental Almanac. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Rae (1993) “Social Equity and Environmental Risk,” 13 Risk Analysis 649–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Rae (1994) “Issues of Clarification in Environmental Equity: How We Manage Is How We Measure,” 21 Fordham Urban Law J. 633–69.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

United States v. County of Muskegon, 33 F. Supp. 2d 614–631 (W.D. Mich. 1998).Google Scholar
United States v. City of New York, 30 F. Supp. 2d 325–331 (E.D.N.Y. 1998).Google Scholar
United States v. Telluride Co., 849 F. Supp. 1400–1406 (D. Colo. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co., 158 F.R.D. 80–89 (S.D. W.Va. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Vineland Chem. Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8881 (D.N.J. 1990).Google Scholar
United States v. Monterey Inv., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19445 (N.D. Calif. 1990).Google Scholar
United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp., 720 F. Supp. 1027–1053 (D. Mass. 1989).Google Scholar
United States v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc., 710 F. Supp. 1172–1255 (N.D. Ind. 1989).Google Scholar
United States v. Tyson, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5683 (E.D. Pa. 1988).Google Scholar
United States v. Conservation Chemical Co., 681 F. Supp. 1394–1422 (W.D. Mo. 1988).Google Scholar
United States v. Crown Enameling, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 1316–1320 (E.D. Mich. 1987).Google Scholar
United States v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 804 F.2d 348–352 (6th Cir. 1986).Google Scholar
United States v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 639 F. Supp. 770–780 (W.D. Tex. 1985).Google Scholar
Walsh v. A & P, 726 F.2d 956–967 (3d Cir. 1983).Google Scholar
Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Com., 688 F.2d 615–637 (9th Cir. 1982).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

28 U.S.C. § 2461 (1994) (concerning adjusting statutory maximum penalties to reflect inflation).Google Scholar
33 U.S.C. § 1366 (1994) (concerning authority of EPA to represent itself in civil actions).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 300j–9(f) (1994) (concerning authority of EPA to represent itself in civil actions).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 7605(a) (1994) (concerning authority of EPA to represent itself in civil actions).Google Scholar
“Announcement and Publication of the Policy for Municipality and Municipal Solid Waste; CERCLA Settlements at NPL Co-Disposal Sites,” 63 Fed. Reg. 8197–8201 (1998).Google Scholar
“Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule,” 61 Fed. Reg. 69359–69366 (1996).Google Scholar
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401–7671q (1994).Google Scholar
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251–1387 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601–9675 (1994).Google Scholar
“Consent judgments in actions to enjoin discharges of pollutants,” 28 C.F.R. §50.7 (2000).Google Scholar
“Final EPA Supplemental Projects Policy Issued,” 63 Fed. Reg. 24796–24804 (1998).Google Scholar
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901–6992k (1994).Google Scholar
Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f–300j-11 (1994).Google Scholar