Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T12:39:55.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientizing Food Safety: Resistance, Acquiescence, and Localization in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jessica Epstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, formal scientific risk management has been codified at all levels of food safety governance in affluent states: firm-level standards, national regulation, and international law. Developing countries' access to affluent importers and power in international standard-setting fora now hinges on their scientific capacity. This article explores the consequences of these developments in India, which moved quickly from resistance to acquiescence, and then later to mobilization around narratives of scientific risk management's local benefits. The case suggests a two-stage model of scientization among developing countries: (1) coercive and competitive mechanisms drive adoption of science-based governance models, and (2) as local actors mobilize to meet foreign demands, they attach their own interests and agendas to science-based reforms. The outcome is a set of rational myths about the benefits of scientization. The article draws on content analysis of organizational, policy, and news documents and a small set of interviews with highly placed pubic officials and industry representatives.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 893 - 920
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank the three anonymous reviewers, Lane Kenworthy, Marc Schneiberg, and Christina Xydias, for helpful feedbacks on prior drafts. She also thanks the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore for its generous hosting in the fall of 2009.

References

Acharya, Amitav (2004) “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,” 58 International Organization 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, Sven, & Caswell, Julie (2009) “Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports,” 91 American J. of Agricultural Economics 310–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athukorala, Prema-Chandra, & Jayasuriya, Sisira (2003) “Food Safety Issues, Trade and WTO Rules: A Developing Country Perspective,” 26 World Economy 1395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhshi, Kajli (1995) SPS Agreement Under the WTO: The Indian Experience. Indian Development Foundation.Google Scholar
Berdegue, Julio A., et al. (2005) “Central American Supermarkets' Private Standards of Quality and Safety in Procurement of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables,” 39 Food Policy 254–69.Google Scholar
Bingen, Jim, & Busch, Lawrence (2006) Agricultural Standards: The Shape of the Global Food And Fiber System. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, & Meyer, John W. (2002) “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law,” in Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G., eds., Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Drahos, Peter (2000) Global Business Regulation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrashekar, K. (2008) “Major Fillip to Dairy Exports,” The Times of India.Google Scholar
Chorev, Nitsan, & Babb, Sarah (2009) “The Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Future of International Institutions: A Comparison of the IMF and the WTO,” 38 Theory and Society 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission (1997) Twenty-Second Session: Report. Geneva.Google Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission (1999) Twenty-Third Session: Report. Rome.Google Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001a) Report of the Sixteenth Session of the Codex Committee on General Principles. Paris.Google Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001b) Twenty-Fourth Session: Report. Geneva.Google Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2003) Twenty-Sixth Session: Report. Rome.Google Scholar
Codex India (2010) “The User's Manual on Codex: A Contemporary Approach to Food Quality and Safety Standards,” http://www.codexindia.nic.in/Training%20Manual.pdf.Google Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. (2010) “Producing Legitimacy at the World Trade Organization: The Role of Expertise and Legal Capacity,” 8 Socio-Economic Rev. 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Kasturi (2008) Addressing SPS Challenges in India. Working Paper, New Delhi: Centre for WTO Studies, Institute of Foreign Trade, Government of India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta, PT Jyothi (2003) “Food Sector Needs Integrated Law,” Business Line.Google Scholar
Datta, PT Jyothi (2011) “Food Safety Body Revamps Scientific Panels,” Business Line.Google Scholar
Debroy, Bibek (2005) The SPS and TBT Agreements—Implications for Indian Policy. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure (1998) Exporting the American Model: The Post-War Transformation of European Business. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (2011) Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, & Sutton, John (1998) “The Strength of a Weak State: The Employment Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Division,” 104 American J. of Sociology 441–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drori, Gili, & Meyer, John W. (2006) “Scientization: Making a World Safe for Organizing,” in Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K., eds., Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Drori, Gili S., et al. (2003) Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren (1999) “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth,” 105 American J. of Sociology 406–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2013) Food and Veterinary Office Audit Database.Google Scholar
European Commission Food and Veterinary Office (2005) Report of a Mission Carried Out in India From 17/01/2005 to 27/01/2005 In Order to Assess the Public Health Control And the Conditions of Production of Fishery Products Including Aquaculture Products.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) of the UN (2005) “Food Safety Risk Analysis, Part I: An Overview and Framework Manual (Provisional Edition),” FAO and WHO.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) of the UN (2006) FAO/WHO Guidance to Governments on the Application of HACCP in Small and/or Less-Developed Food Businesses. FAO Food and Nutrition Papers.Google Scholar
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (2010) Industry Challenges in Food Regulations.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (1991) “Science, the State, and International Society,” Stanford Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Foster, Caroline E. (2008) “Public Opinion and the Interpretation of the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures,” 11 J. of International Economic Law 427–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, Scott, & Moore, Kelly (2006) “Prospects and Challenges for a New Political Sociology of Science,” in Scott, Frickel and Kelly, Moore eds., The New Political Sociology of Science. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, & Korzeniewicz, Miguel, eds. (1994) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, & Shaffer, Gregory (2010) “How Does International Law Work: What Empirical Research Shows.” Legal Studies Research Paper Series University of Minnesota Law School.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldar, Bishwanath (2005) Impact on India of Tariff and Quantitative Restrictions Under WTO. Working Paper, New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence, & Carruthers, Bruce (2009) Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systematic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Henson, Spencer, & Jaffee, Steven (2006) “Food Safety Standards and Trade: Enhancing Competitiveness and Avoiding Exclusion of Developing Countries,” 18 The European J. of Development Research 593–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Spencer, et al. (2004) Impact of Sanitary Measures on Exports of Fishery Products from India: The Case of Kerala. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 17: Cost of Compliance with SPS Standards The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hoberg, George (2001) “Trade, Harmonization, and Domestic Autonomy in Environmental Policy,” 3 J. of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 191–217.Google Scholar
Horton, Linda (2000) “Risk Analysis and the Law: International Law, the World Trade Organization, Codex Alimentarius and National Legislation,” 18 Food Additives and Contaminants 1057–67.Google Scholar
Horton, Linda R. (2007) “Science-Based Decisionmaking: A Global Perspective,” New Delhi.Google Scholar
Huss, H. H., et al. (2004) Assessment and Management of Seafood Safety and Quality. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 444 FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).Google Scholar
International HACCP Alliance (n.d.) “HACCP Questions and Answers,” http://haccpalliance.org/alliance/haccpqa.html (accessed 1 September 2010).Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila (1999) “The Songlines of Risk,” 8 Environmental Values 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauhri, Anil (2007) “Infrastructure and Capacity Building for Food Safety and Quality—Indian Scenario,” New Delhi.Google Scholar
Kumar, Rahul (2003) “Punjab to Grow Yellow Onions for UK, Europe,” The Economic Times.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael A. (2006) “Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius,” NYU Law Rev. 766–801.Google Scholar
Mathew, Mony K. (2004) “Seafood Industry Looks for A Lifeline,” Business Line, Aug. 30.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Food Processing Industries (1993/1994–2007/2008) Annual Reports. Delhi: Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India.Google Scholar
Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India (2006) Food Safety and Standards Act.Google Scholar
Misra, Bejon (2007) “Consumer Expectations – Emerging Trends and Shifts – A Perspective from Consumer Organizations,” New Delhi.Google Scholar
Miyagishima, Kazuaki (2008) “Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards,” Noida.Google Scholar
Moore, Kelly, et al. (2011) “Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach,” 40 Theory and Society 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, G. K. (2004) “Spices Board to Take up Sudan Dye Issue with EU at Spain Meet,” Business Line, Jun.1.Google Scholar
Padmapriya, J (2004) “Grape Exporters Face Stricter EU Quality Norms,” The Economic Times.Google Scholar
Palthur, M. Prasad, et al. (2009) “The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: A Paradigm Shift in Indian Regulatory Scenario,” 7 Pharmaceutical Rev. 14–20.Google Scholar
Poli, Sara (2004) “The European Community and the Adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission,” 10 European Law J. 613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polillo, Simone, & Guillen, Mauro (2005) “Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence,” 110 American Journal of Sociology 1764–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponte, Stefano, & Gibbon, Peter (2005) “Quality Standards, Conventions and the Governance of Global Value Chains,” 34 Economy and Society 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Satya (2012) Status of Food Laboratories in India. Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
Quark, Amy (2012) “Scientized Politics and Global Governance in the Cotton Trade: Evaluating Divergent Theories of Scientization,” 19 Rev. of International Political Economy 895–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio M. (2004) “The Puzzle of Regulatory Competition,” 24 J. of Public Policy 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randell, Alan (2002) “Scientific Basis for Setting Food Standards Through Codex Alimentarius,” Food, Nutrition, and Agriculture 7–13.Google Scholar
Rao, K. Rajeswara (2008) “Initiative by the MoFPI on Food Safety and Quality,” Noida.Google Scholar
Reardon, Thomas, et al. (1999) “Global Change in Agrifood Grades and Standards: Agribusiness Strategic Responses in Developing Countries,” 2 International Food and Agribusiness Management Rev. 421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2004) The Politics of International Law. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Donna, & Unnevehr, Laurian (2005) “Resolving Trade Disputes Arising from Trends in Food Safety Regulation: The Role of the Multilateral Governance Framework,” 4 World Trade Rev. 469–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronald, Bindu Samuel (2006) Market Access for Agricultural Products. Working Paper, School of Economic and Business Laws, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences & UNDP.Google Scholar
Roy, William G (1997) Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofer, Evan (2004) “Cross-National Differences in the Expansion of Science, 1970–1990,” 83 Social Forces 215–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A. (2007) “Global Linkages and Domestic Politics: Trade Reform and Institution Building in India in Comparative Perspective,” 40 Comparative Political Studies 1183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinnen, Johan, ed. (2007) Global Supply Chains, Standards and the Poor: How the Globalization of Food Systems and Standards Affects Rural Development and Poverty. Cambridge, MA: CABI.Google Scholar
Thornsbury, Suzanne (2000) Sanitary and Phytosanitary Issues: Where Does the WTO Go from Here? Working Paper, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Traill, Bruce W., et al. (2002) Report of the Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and Other FAO and WHO Standards Work. FAO & WHO.Google Scholar
Veggeland, Frode, & Borgen, Svein Ole (2005) “Negotiating International Food Standards: The World Trade Organization's Impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission,” 18 Governance 675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David (1995) Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David (2012) The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Winickoff, David, & Bushey, Douglas (2009) “Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius,” 35 Science, Technology & Human Values 356–81.Google Scholar