Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T08:01:21.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Situational and Attitudinal Explanations of Police Behavior: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Empirical Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Robert E. Worden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reappraises the value of situational and attitudinal variables as parts of a theory of police behavior. That situational factors affect officers' decisions to make arrests is well supported by empirical evidence; that officers' behavior is shaped by their attitudes and values is a common assumption even though it is supported only by weak empirical evidence. This analysis indicates that the theoretical utility of situational variables is limited for the most part to the arrest decision: Situational factors have modest effects on officers' choices among informal actions. Furthermore, the analysis shows that attitudinal variables fail to account for more than a very small part of the variation in behavior. A theoretical perspective on police behavior as administrative decisionmaking is consistent with these findings, and might redirect future research along more fruitful lines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , 1989 , pp. 667 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Alissa Pollitz Worden, Gordon P. Whitaker, Stephen Mastrofski, Shari S. Diamond, and the Law & Society Review's anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions, and to absolve them of responsibility for any errors that remain.

References

ACOCK, Alan C., and Melvin L., DEFLEUR (1972) “A Configurational Approach to Contingent Consistency in the Attitude-Behavior Relationship,” 37 American Sociological Review 714.Google Scholar
ALDRICH, John, and Charles F., CNUDDE (1975) “Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom: A Comparison of Regression, Probit, and Discriminant Analysis,” 19 American Journal of Political Science 571.Google Scholar
BAYLEY, David H. (1986) “The Tactical Choices of Police Patrol Officers,” 14 Journal of Criminal Justice 329.Google Scholar
BENDOR, Jonathan (1988) “Review Article: Formal Models of Bureaucracy,” 18 British Journal of Political Science 353.Google Scholar
BERK, Sarah Fenstermaker, and Donileen R., LOSEKE (1980–81) “‘Handling’ Family Violence: Situational Determinants of Police Arrest in Domestic Disturbances,” 15 Law & Society Review 317.Google Scholar
BITTNER, Egon (1974) “Florence Nightingale in Pursuit of Willie Sutton: A Theory of the Police,” in Jacob, H. (ed.), The Potential for Reform of Criminal Justice. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1980) The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1971) “The Social Organization of Arrest,” 23 Stanford Law Review 1087.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1970) “The Production of Crime Rates,” 35 American Sociological Review 333.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald, and Albert J., REISS Jr. (1970) “Police Control of Juveniles,” 35 American Sociological Review 63.Google Scholar
BLALOCK, Hubert M. Jr. (1965) “Theory Building and the Statistical Concept of Interaction,” 30 American Sociological Review 374.Google Scholar
BRODERICK, John J. (1977) Police in a Time of Change. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
BROWN, Michael K. (1981) Working the Street: Police Discretion and the Dilemmas of Reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
CALDWELL, Eddie (1978) “Patrol Observation: The Patrol Encounter, Patrol Narrative, and General Shift Information Forms.” Unpublished. Police Services Study Methods Report MR-02. Bloomington, IN, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
CUMMING, Elaine, Ian, CUMMING, and Laura, EDELL (1965) “Policeman as Philosopher, Guide, and Friend,” 12 Social Problems 276.Google Scholar
DANIELS, Mark R., and R., DARCY (1983) “Notes on the Use and Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis,” 27 American Journal of Political Science 359.Google Scholar
DEFLEUR, Melvin L., and Frank R., WESTIE (1963) “Attitude as a Scientific Concept,” 42 Social Forces 17.Google Scholar
DEFLEUR, Melvin L. (1958) “Verbal Attitudes and Overt Acts: An Experiment on the Salience of Attitudes,” 23 American Sociological Review 667.Google Scholar
ERICSON, Richard V. (1982) Reproducing Order: A Study of Police Patrol Work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERICSSON, K. Anders, and Herbert A., SIMON (1984) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
FIELDING, Nigel G. (1988) Joining Forces: Police Training, Socialization, and Occupational Competence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
FISCHER, Edward H., and Amerigo, FARINA (1978) “Attitude Toward Abortion and Attitude-Relevant Overt Behavior,” 57 Social Forces 585.Google Scholar
FORD, J. Kevin, Neal, SCHMITT, Susan L., SCHECHTMAN, Brian M., HULTS, and Mary L., DOHERTY (1989) “Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions,” 43 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75.Google Scholar
FRANK, James, and Steven, BRANDL (1989) “The Attitude-Behavior Relationship: An Application to Police Research.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association, Chicago, IL, October 5–7.Google Scholar
FRIDERES, James S., Lyle G., WARNER, and Stan L., ALBRECHT (1971) “The Impact of Social Constraints on the Relationship Between Attitudes and Behavior,” 50 Social Forces 102.Google Scholar
FRIEDRICH, Robert J. (1977) “The Impact of Organizational, Individual, and Situational Factors on Police Behavior.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
FYFE, James J. (1988) “Who Gets Tickets? Police Discretion in Routine Traffic Stops.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL, November 9–12.Google Scholar
GARDINER, John A. (1969) Traffic and the Police: Variations in Law Enforcement Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GATES, Scott, and Robert E., WORDEN (1989) “Principal-Agent Models of Hierarchical Control in Public Bureaucracies: Work, Shirking, and Supervision in Police Agencies.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Herman (1977) Policing a Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Herman (1963) “Police Discretion: The Ideal Versus the Real,” 23 Public Administration Review 140.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Joseph (1960) “Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice,” 69 Yale Law Journal 543.Google Scholar
HANUSHEK, Eric A., and John E., JACKSON (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HEBERLEIN, Thomas A., and J. Stanley, BLACK (1976) “Attitudinal Specificity and the Prediction of Behavior in a Field Setting,” 33 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 474.Google Scholar
KLECKA, William R. (1980) Discriminant Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. 19. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KNOTT, Jack H., and Gary J., MILLER (1987) Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
LIPSKY, Michael (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
LISKA, Allen E. (1974a) “Emergent Issues in the Attitude Behavior Consistency Controversy,” 39 American Sociological Review 261.Google Scholar
LISKA, Allen E. (1974b) “The Impact of Attitudes on Behavior: Attitude-Social Support Interaction,” 17 Pacific Sociological Review 83.Google Scholar
LUNDMAN, Richard J. (1979) “Organizational Norms and Police Discretion: An Observational Study of Police Work with Traffic Violators,” 17 Criminology 159.Google Scholar
LUNDMAN, Richard J. (1974) “Routine Police Arrest Practices: A Commonweal Perspective,” 22 Social Problems 127.Google Scholar
LUNDMAN, Richard J., Richard E., SYKES, and John P., CLARK (1978) “Police Control of Juveniles: A Replication,” 15 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 74.Google Scholar
MANNING, Peter K. (1987) “The Police Occupational Culture in Anglo-American Societies,” in Strecher, V., Hoover, L., and Dowling, J. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Police Science. Gower.Google Scholar
MANNING, Peter K. (1982) “Organizational Work: Structuration of Environments,” 33 British Journal of Sociology 118.Google Scholar
MANNING, Peter K. (1979) “The Social Control of Police Work,” in Holdaway, S. (ed.), British Police. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
MANNING, Peter K. (1977) Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MARCH, James G. (1982) “Theories of Choice and Making Decisions,” 20 Society 29.Google Scholar
MARCH, James G. (1978) “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice,” 9 Bell Journal of Economics 587.Google Scholar
MARCH, James G., and Johan P., OLSEN (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlagel.Google Scholar
MARCH, James G., and Herbert A., SIMON (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
MASTROFSKI, Stephen D., R. Richard, RITTI, and Debra, HOFFMASTER (1987) “Organizational Determinants of Police Discretion: The Case of Drinking-Driving,” 15 Journal of Criminal Justice 387.Google Scholar
MCNAMARA, John H. (1967) “Uncertainties in Police Work: The Relevance of Police Recruits' Backgrounds and Training,” in Bordua, D. J. (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
MOE, Terry M. (1984) “The New Economics of Organization,” 28 American Journal of Political Science 739.Google Scholar
MOHR, Lawrence B. (1982) Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
MUIR, William K Jr. (1977) Police: Streetcorner Politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
NEWELL, Allen, and Herbert A., SIMON (1972) Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
PARNAS, Raymond I. (1967) “The Police Response to the Domestic Disturbance,” 2 Wisconsin Law Review 914.Google Scholar
PEPINSKY, Harold E. (1976) “Police Patrolmen's Offense-Reporting Behavior,” 13 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33.Google Scholar
PILIAVIN, Irving, and Scott, BRIAR (1964) “Police Encounters with Juveniles,” 70 American Journal of Sociology 206.Google Scholar
PROTTAS, Jeffrey M. (1978) “The Power of the Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies,” 13 Urban Affairs Quarterly 285.Google Scholar
REISS, Albert J. Jr. (1971) The Police and the Public. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
REUSS-IANNI, Elizabeth (1983) Two Cultures of Policing: Street Cops and Management Cops. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
RUBINSTEIN, Jonathan (1973) City Police. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
SHERMAN, Lawrence W. (1980) “Causes of Police Behavior: The Current State of Quantitative Research,” 17 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 69.Google Scholar
SHERMAN, Lawrence W., and Richard A., BERK (1984) “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault,” 49 American Sociological Review 261.Google Scholar
SHUMAN, Howard, and Michael P., JOHNSON (1976) “Attitudes and Behavior,” 2 Annual Review of Sociology 161.Google Scholar
SIGELMAN, Lee (1984) “Doing Discriminant Analysis: Some Problems and Solutions,” 10 Political Methodology 67.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A. (1979) “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations,” 69 American Economic Review 493.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A. (1976) Administrative Behavior, 3rd Ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A. (1956) “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment,” 63 Psychological Review 129.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A. (1955) “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” 69 Quarterly Journal of Economics 99.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome H. (1975) Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
SMITH, Douglas A. (1987) “Police Response to Interpersonal Violence: Defining the Parameters of Legal Control,” 65 Social Forces 767.Google Scholar
SMITH, Douglas A. (1984) “The Organizational Context of Legal Control,” 22 Criminology 19.Google Scholar
SMITH, Douglas A., and Jody R., KLEIN (1984) “Police Control of Interpersonal Disputes,” 31 Social Problems 468.Google Scholar
SMITH, Douglas A., and Christy A., VISHER (1981) “Street-Level Justice: Situational Determinants of Police Arrest Decisions,” 29 Social Problems 167.Google Scholar
SYKES, Richard E., and John P., CLARK (1975) “A Theory of Deference Exchange in Police-Civilian Encounters,” 81 American Journal of Sociology 584.Google Scholar
SYKES, Richard E., James C., FOX, and John P., CLARK (1976) “A SocioLegal Theory of Police Discretion,” in Niederhoffer, A. and Blumberg, A. (eds.), The Ambivalent Force: Perspectives on the Police. Hinsdale, IL: Dry den Press.Google Scholar
TALARICO, Susette M., and Charles R., SWANSON (1980) “Policing Styles: Notes on an Empirical Synthesis of Wilson and Muir,” 8 Journal of Criminal Justice 327.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, James D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
VAN MAANEN, John (1983) “The Boss: First-Line Supervision in an American Police Agency,” in Punch, M. (ed.), Control in the Police Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
VAN MAANEN, John (1974) “Working the Street: A Developmental View of Police Behavior,” in Jacob, H. (ed.), The Potential for Reform of Criminal Justice. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
WAALAND, Pam, and Stuart, KEELEY (1985) “Police Decision Making in Wife Abuse: The Impact of Legal and Extralegal Factors,” 9 Law and Human Behavior 355.Google Scholar
WARNER, Lyle G., and Melvin L., DEFLEUR (1969) “Attitude as an Interactional Concept: Social Constraint and Social Distance as Intervening Variables Between Attitudes and Action,” 34 American Sociological Review 153.Google Scholar
WEICK, Karl E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd Ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
WERTHMAN, Carl, and Irving, PILIAVIN (1967) “Gang Members and the Police,” in Bordua, D. J. (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
WESTLEY, William A. (1970) Violence and the Police: A Sociological Study of Law, Custom, and Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
WHITAKER, Gordon P. (1982) “What Is Patrol Work?” 4 Police Studies 13.Google Scholar
WHITE, Susan O. (1972) “A Perspective on Police Professionalization,” 7 Law & Society Review 61.Google Scholar
WICKER, Allan W. (1969) “Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects,” 25 Journal of Social Issues 41.Google Scholar
WILLIAMSON, John B., David A., KARP, John R., DALPHIN, and Paul S., GRAY (1982) The Research Craft. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
WILSON, James Q. (1968) Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILSON, James Q., and Barbara, BOLAND (1978) “The Effect of the Police on Crime,” 12 Law & Society Review 367.Google Scholar
WORDEN, Alissa P. (1984) “Police Responses to Domestic Disturbances: Two Dimensions of Reactivity.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
WORDEN, Robert E. (1986) “The Premises of Police Work: What Policemen Believe and What Difference It Makes.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
WORDEN, Robert E., and Steven G., BRANDL (in press) “Protocol Analysis of Police Decision Making: Toward a Theory of Police Behavior,” American Journal of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
WORDEN, Robert E., and Stephen D., MASTROFSKI (1989) “Varieties of Police Subcultures: A Preliminary Investigation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Madison, WI, June 8–11.Google Scholar
WORDEN, Robert E., and Alissa A., POLLITZ (1984) “Police Arrests in Domestic Disturbances: A Further Look,” 18 Law & Society Review 105.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Gerald C. Jr. (1976) “Linear Models for Evaluating Conditional Relationships,” 20 American Journal of Political Science 349.Google Scholar