Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T21:12:52.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Psychology and the Emergence of Disputes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Dan Coates  and
Steven Penrod
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is growing interest in the role that individual judgments play in moving people to seek recompense for perceived injuries. Social psychological theory and research may provide valuable clues about the types of judgments that are important in the development of disputes, and the facts that influence these judgments. In this paper, we describe relative deprivation, perceived control, equity, and attribution theories. We also discuss the relevance of these theories to dispute development, differential rates of problem perception, and the making of claims for redress. We conclude with suggestions for future research on the emergence of disputes.

Type
Part Two-The Civil Litigation Research Project: A Dispute-Focused Approach
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 15 , Issue 3-4: Special Issue on Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation , 1981 , pp. 655 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by grants from the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin and grant number 80-IJ-CX-0034 from the National Institute of Justice. The authors would like to thank David Trubek, Richard Miller, and Stewart Macaulay for their thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

For references cited in this article, see p. 883.