Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T22:58:59.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

State Transformation and the Role of Lawyers: The WTO, India, and Transnational Legal Ordering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

This article explains the impact of India's engagement with the law of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on both the Indian state and on the WTO itself. In each case, it explains the role of Indian lawyers within the larger transnational context. In engaging with globalization and the WTO, India has transformed itself. The Indian state has moved toward a new developmental state model involving a stronger emphasis on trade, greater government transparency, and the development of public-private coordination mechanisms in which the government plays a steering role. The analysis shows that it has done so not as an autonomous policy choice, but rather in light of the global context in which the WTO and WTO law form an integral part. Reciprocally, the article displays the ways that India has built legal capacity to attempt to shape the construction, interpretation, and practice of the trade legal order. Indian private lawyers play increasing roles, although they remain on tap, not on top.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2015 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Gregory Shaffer is Chancellor's Professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Law; James Nedumpara is Associate Professor and Executive Director, Centre for International Trade and Economic Laws, Jindal Global Law School; Aseema Sinha is Wagener Chair in South Asian Politics and George R. Roberts Fellow, Associate Professor at Claremont Mckenna College.

References

Acharya, Amitav (2004) “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,” 58 International Organization 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, Alice (2000) “The Bark is Worse than the Bite: New WTO Law and Late Industrialization,” 570 Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, Alice (2001) The Rise of “The Rest” : Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (1997) India- Patent Protection for Pharmaceuticals and Agricultural Chemical Products. WT/DS 50/R and WT/DS 50/AB/R. December 19, 1997.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (1999) India – Quantitative Restrictions on Imports of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products. WT/DS90/AB/R. September 22, 1999.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2000) India- Measures Relating to Trade and Investment in the Motor Vehicle Sector. WT/DS 175/AB/R. May 15, 2000.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2003) European Communities — Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-type Bed Linen from India, WT/DS 141/AB/R. April 24, 2003.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2005) European Communities — Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries. WT/DS 246/AB/R. July 20, 2005.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2008a) US–Measures Relating to Shrimp from Thailand and US–Customs Bond Directive for Merchandise Subject to Anti-Dumping/Countervailing Duties. WT/DS343/AB/R, WT/DS345/AB/R. July 16, 2008.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2008b) India- Additional and Extra-Additional Duties on Imports from the United States. WT/DS 360/AB/R. October 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Appellate Body (AB) Report (2014) United States - Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel flat Products from India. WT/DS436/AB/R. December 19, 2014.Google Scholar
Battacharyya, B. (2007) “The Indian Shrimp Industry Organizes to Fight the Threat of Antidumping Action,” in Gallagher, P., Low, P., Stoler, A. L., eds. Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish (1993) Indian in Transition: Freeing the Economy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad (2015) “Global Antidumping Database,” The World Bank. Available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/gad/ (accessed 25 April 2015).Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf-Peter & Peer, Zumbansen (2010) Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, Eve (2013) Law and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves & Garth, Bryant (2002) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves & Garth, Bryant (2010) Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter (2009) “The Jewel in the Crown: India's Patent Office and Patent-Based Innovation,” in Arup, , , C., & , W. van Caenegem, , eds., Intellectual Property Policy Reform: Fostering Innovation and Development. 80100.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter (1995) Embedded Autonomy. New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Lisa (2008) “An Elementary Consideration of Humanity? Linking Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights to the Human Right to Health in International Law,” 14 J. World Intellectual Property 168.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas (1999) The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc & Robinson, Nick (2013) India's Grand Advocates: A Legal Elite Flourishing in the Era of Globalization. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2348699. (accessed 3 June 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, Gary (2014) “Global Value Chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World,” 12 Rev. of International Political Economy 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence & Shaffer, Gregory (2015) Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussmann, Ricardo, Rodrik, Dani, & Sabel, Charles (2008) Reconfiguring Industrial Policy: A Framework with an Application to South Africa. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1245702. (accessed 3 June 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, , McGrew, David, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, & Perraton, Jonathan (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret (1988) Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Little, Ian Malcom David (1982) Economic Development: Theory, Policy and International Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jha, Madhurendra Nath (2013) “India”, in Yilmaz, M. ed. Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies: Experiences of the Most Active WTO Members. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers (1999) “The Developmental State: The Odyssey of a Concept,” in Woo-Cumings, , , M., ed., Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Vijay & David Little, Ian Malcom (1996) India's Economic Reforms 19912001. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy (2009) “Harmonization and Its Discontents: A Case Study of TRIPS Implementation in India's Pharmaceutical Sector,” 97 California Law Rev. 1571–650.Google Scholar
Kher, Rajeev (2013) “India in the World Patent Order,” in Abbott, F.M., Correa, C.M., and Drahos, P., eds. Emerging Markets and the World Patent Order. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mukherji, Rahul (2014) Globalization and Deregulation: Ideas, Interests and Institutional Change in India. New Delhi, London, New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Tricia & Sinha, Aseema (2013) “Linkage Politics and the Persistence of National Policy Autonomy in Emerging Powers: Patents, Profits, and Patients in the Context of TRIPS Compliance,” 15 Business and Politics 323–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2003) International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riain, Seán Ó (2004) The Politics of High-Tech Growth: Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, PN (1943) “Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,” 53 The Economic J. 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Alvaro (2012) “Carving out Policy Autonomy for Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization: The Experience of Brazil and Mexico,” 52 Virginia J. of International Law 551632.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2003) Toward a New Legal Common Sense (2nd ed.) London: Butterworths LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2003) Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Shaffer, , , Gregory ed. (2013) Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Ratton Sanchez, Michelle, & Rosenberg, Barbara (2008) “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success,” 41 Cornell International Law J. 383501.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory & Gao, Henry (2015) China's Development of WTO Legal Capacity. Draft on file, Irvine: University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema (2005) The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India: A Divided Leviathan. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema (2007) “Global Linkages and Domestic Politics: Trade Reform and Institution Building in India in Comparative Perspective,” 40 Comparative Political Studies 1183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Aseema (2014) When David Meets Goliath: How Global Markets and Rules are Shaping India's Rise to Power. Under Contract, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan (1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Richard (2011) “The East Asian Developmental State and The Great Recession,” 17 Contemporary Politics 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, , , David, Garcia, Helena Alviar, Coutinho, Diogo, & Santos, Alvaro, eds. (2013) Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, William (2009) General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Robert Hunter (2003) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph (2001) “The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement35 J. of World Trade 35, 191207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, John. (1990) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
WIPO (2013) Statistical Country Profiles. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile (accessed 2 July 2014).Google Scholar
WTO (2012) Request for the Establishment of a panel by the United States, India- Measures Concerning the Importation of Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS 430/3. (May 14, 2012).Google Scholar
WTO (2015) Trade Policy Review of India: Report by the Secretariat. WT/TPR/S/313. April 28, 2015, available at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp413_e.htmGoogle Scholar
Wu, Mark (2014) “Indian Corporations, the Administrative State and the Rise of Indian Trade Remedies.” Draft on file, Cambridge: Harvard Law School.Google Scholar