Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T17:02:25.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Gregory Casey
Gregory Casey*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri—Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The mass public is often depicted as indifferent to and unaware of many facets of political life which elites deem essential to understanding the political process (Converse, 1964: 209-14, 231-41; Key, 1964: 182-85, 199-202). Yet despite its indifference to political reality as defined by elites, the general public does hold its own version of political reality - albeit a more emotional, more symbolic, and less concrete reality than elites view (Prothro and Grigg, 1960: 276-94; Edelman, 1967: 1-7, 12-19, 178-81; Berger and Luckmann, 1966: 31-34). Popular perceptions of the United States Supreme Court follow this pattern: on the one hand, most observers take for granted that the public appreciates the Court on a symbolic or mythical plane while, on the other hand, most research concludes that the masses lack factual information on this institution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Spring 1974 , pp. 385 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1974.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

AUTHOR'S NOTE: I would like to express gratitude to the Graduate Research Council of the University of Missouri-Columbia, whose financial support made possible the survey which generated the data analyzed in this paper; to Professors David C. Leege of the University of Illinois-Chicago Circle and Sarah L. Boggs of the University of Missouri-St. Louis, both formerly of the University of Missouri-Columbia, for their assistance in questionnaire design and coding problems; and to Professors Roger E. Durand, Herbert K. Tillema and Dean L. Yarwood of the University of Missouri-Columbia, and Professor Michael W. Mansfield of Baylor University, for their helpful comments on previous drafts of this paper.

References

Cases

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

BECKER, Theodore (1969) The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BERELSON, Bernard R., LAZARSFELD, Paul F., and McPHEE, William N. (1954) Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
BERGER, Peter L. and Thomas, LUCKMANN (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Doubleday.Google Scholar
BLAWIE, James L. and Marion J., BLAWIE (1965) “The Judicial Decision: A Second Look at Certain Assumptions of Behavioral Research,” 18 Western Political Quarterly 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANTRIL, Hadley (1951) Public Opinion 1935-1946. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CONVERSE, Philip E. (1964) “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in David E., AFTER (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
DAHL, Robert A. (1957) “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker,” 6 Journal of Public Law 279.Google Scholar
DAHL, Robert A. (1972) Democracy in the United States: Promise and Performance. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
DAHL, Robert A. (1970) Modern Political Analysis (second edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
DEVINE, Donald J. (1972) The Political Culture of the United States. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
DOHM, Richard (1971) Political Culture of Missouri. Columbia, Mo.: University of Missouri-Columbia Extension Division.Google Scholar
DOLBEARE, Kenneth M. (1967) “The Public Views the Supreme Court,” in Herbert, JACOB (ed.) Law, Politics, and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Herbert, JACOB (1968) “The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOUGLAS, William O. (1949) “Stare Decisis,” 49 Columbia Law Review 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EASTON, David (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
EASTON, David (1969) Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1967) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
ELAZAR, Daniel J. (1966) American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
ENGSTROM, Richard L. and Michael W., GILES (1972) “Expectations and Images: A Note on Diffuse Support for Legal Institutions,” 6 Law & Society Review 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FESTINGER, Leon (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row-Peterson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1930) Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano's.Google Scholar
GILES, Michael (1973) “Lawyers and the Supreme Court: A Comparative Look at Some Attitudinal Linkages,” 35 Journal of Politics 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUSFIELD, Joseph (1963) Symbolic Crusade. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
HAKMAN, Nathan (1966) “Lobbying the Supreme Court—An Appraisal of ‘Political Science Folklore,‘” 35 Fordham Law Review 15.Google Scholar
HAND, Learned (1958) The Bill of Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, Robert D. and Torney, Judith V. (1967) The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
HIRSCH, Herbert and Lewis, DONOHEW (1968) “A Note on Negro-White Differences in Attitudes toward the Supreme Court,” 49 Social Science Quarterly 557.Google Scholar
HOFSTADTER, Richard (1963) “The Pseudo-Conservative Revolt,” in Daniel, BELL (ed.) The Radical Right. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
HYNEMAN, Charles S. (1964) The Supreme Court on Trial. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Richard M. (1967) The Dynamics of Compliance. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
KESSEL, John H. (1966) “Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court,” 10 Midwest Journal of Political Science 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KEY, V. O. Jr. (1964) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
LADINSKY, Jack, and Allan, SILVER (1967) “Popular Democracy and Judicial Independence,” 1967 Wisconsin Law Review 128.Google Scholar
LANE, Robert E. (1962) Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LANE, Robert E. (1964) Public Opinion. Engle-wood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
LASSWELL, Harold D. and Abraham, KAPLAN (1950) Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
LERNER, Max (1937) “Constitution and Court as Symbols,” 46 Yale Law Review 1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEVINE, James P. and Theodore L., BECKER (1973) “Toward and Beyond a Theory of Supreme Court Impact,” in Theodore L. BECKER and Malcolm M. FEELEY, The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LUTTBEG, Norman R. (1968) “The Structure of Beliefs Among Leaders and the Public,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIVER, R. M. (1947) The Web of Government. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MASON, Alpheus T. (1962) “Myth and Reality in Supreme Court Decisions,” 48 Virginia Law Review 1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacINTOSH, Donald (1963) “Power and Social Control,” 57 American Political Science Review 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MERELMAN, Richard (1966) “Learning and Legitimacy,” 60 American Political Science Review 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MERRIAM, Charles Edward (1934) Political Power. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
MILLER, Arthur Selwyn (1965) “Some Pervasive Myths About the United States Supreme Court,” 10 St. Louis University Law Journal 153.Google Scholar
MILLER, Arthur Selwyn (1967) “The Power of the Supreme Court in the Age of the Positive State,” 1967 Duke Law Journal 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MISHKIN, Paul (1965) “Foreword: The High Court, the Great Writ, and the Due Process of Law,” 79 Harvard Law Review 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUIR, William K Jr. (1967) Prayer in the Public Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Walter F. and Joseph, TANENHAUS (1969) “Constitutional Courts and Political Representation,” in Michael N., DAVIDSON and Walter F., MURPHY (eds.) Modern American Democracy: Readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Walter F., MURPHY (1968a) “Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: the Goldwater Campaign,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter F., MURPHY (1968b) “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court,” 2 Law & Society Review 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter F., MURPHY (1972) The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
NAGEL, Stuart S. (1965) “Court-Curbing Periods in American History,” 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 925.Google Scholar
NEWLAND, Chester A. (1964) “Press Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court,” 17 Western Political Quarterly 15.Google Scholar
PETRICK, Michael (1968) “The Supreme Court and Authority Acceptance,” 21 Western Political Quarterly 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PROTHRO, James W. and Charles W., GRIGG (1960) “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement,” 22 Journal of Politics 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHAPIRO, Martin (1963) “The Supreme Court and Constitutional Adjudication: Of Politics and Neutral Principles,” 31 George Washington Law Review 587.Google Scholar
ULMER, S. Sidney (1973) “Bricolage and Assorted Thoughts on Working in the Papers of Supreme Court Justices,” 35 Journal of Politics 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WATSON, Richard A. and Rondal G., DOWNING (1969) The Politics of the Bench and the Bar. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
WECHSLER, Herbert (1961) Principles, Politics, and Fundamental Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar